• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does Cain’s punishment support evolution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dagelos

Newbie
Dec 31, 2011
199
2
✟339.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You've clearly missed the point of my argument. For much of this thread you and Isreal have been saying that Europeans are the only descendants of the lost tribes of Isreal. I've given you three examples which prove, using DNA analysis, that other groups of people in the world are also have Jewish roots.

The Israeli government consider the Bnei of India Jewish enough to be given citizenship in Israel. Their authority on who is Jewish and who is not is greater than yours.

I already discussed the origin of Adam's name here.

Jews have mixed with everyone in the world,there is no Jewish race.
The Indian Jews are obviously followers of Judaism.
The London Jewish World of March 15, 1923 declared: "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."
Jews are not to be confused with Israelites.

You are confusing Jewish and Israel.
Israel did not migrate into Africa or Asia,they migrated into Europe.
Their marks are all over the place.
They are the only nations to accept Christianity.

James was writing to the Twelve Tribes...

James 1:1:James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.

European nations are white,read the Hebrew definition in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance for Adam....

119 'adam aw-dam' to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:--be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

These characteristics of a white man,this is the Hebrew definition in Strong's Concordance.

Go back and read those Jewish quotes that were posted.....




FROM ISRAELITE TO SAXON

By

Rev. William Pascoe Goard

IN speaking of the United States and Britain as modern Israel, it is necessary to remember certain things in order to avoid confusion.

First of all, the people of Israel were no more divided into tribes, but had, centuries before, passed into the more advanced stage of national organization. It is the natural progress of any progressive people. First, it is the family, then the tribes, then the nation embracing the tribes. We must think of Israel as a nation and a company of nations, no more called Israel, for the best of reasons, but called by the name, above all others, of sons or House of Isaac, or Saxons, with many other branch names.

Secondly, we must remember that they were not the original founders of Israel in the Isles - that is to say, in Britain - but they came in very late in British history, even a thousand years after the House of David had arrived and been established there.

We shall, therefore, approach the subject of the ten-tribed House of Israel as being the consideration of a branch of the Israel people which, late in history, arrived in Britain, and added their strength to those who had preceded thern.

We begin with the separation of the House of Israel from the House of Judah. Thereafter there were two nations in Palestine of the Israel stock, and their histories are separately recorded, with their separate lines of kings, in the books of Kings and Chronicles. Read them there, and be sure to read them separately.

Thence we find Israel carried captive to Halah, Habor, and the River Gozan. Professor Odlum says of this deportation:

"The distance to which Israel was carried from their own country in about 721 B.C. was not less than seven hundred miles in a north and east direction. The Syrian desert, the River Euphrates, the Mesopotamian region, the Tigris, and three ranges of the Kurdistan mountains intervened between Samaria and the new home of Israel in captivity. In this district were the cities and regions of Halah, Habor, and the River Gozan, which flowed into the Caspian Sea, as it does today. This new home was the high tablelands of Media and Armenia ...... "

While settled in this district, they aided the Medes and Persians to break the power of their captors, the Assyrians. Afterwards Babylon went down before their arms.

From this time they were on their way to their new European home. They found unoccupied territory in the neighbourhood of Ar-Sareth in southeast Europe.

Here they occupied the Crimea, and spread up the waterways, passing the watershed and down the waterways to the Baltic and the North Seas.

Sharon Turner says: "The migrating Scythians crossed the Araxes, passed out of Asia, and suddenly appeared in Europe in the sixth century B.C."

Esdras in the Apocrypha tells us that the Ten Tribes left their exile and moved away across the Euphrates to a place called Arsareth (City or Hill of Sareth) (2 Esdras 13:39-45). To the northwest of the Black Sea is a river called Sareth to this day.

Herodotus, speaking of the same date as Esdras, says: "The Scythians ernerged frorn beyond the Euphrates across the Armenian river Araxes."

Rev. W. M. H. Milner says: "The fugitive host, starting from upper Media, passed the north end of Lake Umri into the mountain valleys of the Kurds; here some dropped off, and their children became in after ages the Nestorian Church. These were for thirteen centuries the missionaries of Asia."

Herodotus says the Persians called the Scythians Sakai, and Sharon Turner identifies these very people as the ancestors of the Anglo-Saxons. The old Greek writers spoke often of the valour and the undaunted spirit of these Scythians. They say "No nation on earth can match them. They are unconquerable."

Professor Odlum continues: "From Josephus, the Jewish historian of the first century, we learn that at A.D. 70 the Ten Tribes were outside the Roman Empire. By other means we learn that they were in the south of Russia in immense multitudes, and known as the Scythians of Herodotus."

The burial places of the Israel people have furnished ample inscriptions to show clearly that the Crimea was a centre of residence for this people for ages, and that from it they spread up through Europe and eastward as far as China.

Diodorus says: "The Sacae sprang from people in Media who obtained a vast and glorious empire."

Ptolerny finds the Saxons in "a race of Scythians called Saki, who came from Media."

Pliny says: "The Sakai were among the most distinguished people of Scythia who settled in Armenia, and were called Sacae-Sani. "

Albinus says: "The Saxons were descended from the ancient Sacae in Asia."

Prideaux finds that "the Cimbrians (Kumrii) came from the Black and Caspian Seas, and that with them came the Angli. "

Sharon Turner, the rnost painstaking Saxon historian says: 'The Saxons were a Scythian nation, and were called Saca, Sachi, Sach-sen. "

Colonel Gawler, in Our Scythion Ancestors, says: "The word Sacae is fairly and without straining or imagination translated Israelites."

The Bible (Amos, chapter seven) solemnly takes cognizance of the change of the name of the nation and people from Israel to "the House of lsaac" (Saxons).

Thus we see these people settled about the Crimea, along the rivers of Europe from the sixth century B.C.

Their migrations to the Baltic and North Seas are well told by Du Chaillu, a scholar of England with a French name.

The militant progress of the Goths, Gotti, "Men of God," is well known in the history of Europe. The divisional names of Angles, Jutes, and so on, are duplicated today by the names our race now bears as English, Welsh, Scotch, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, (Anzacs), Americans, and so on.

From the sixth century B.C. to the time of the landing of Hengist and Horsa, these people had been steadily progressing up through Europe, God's Battle Axe Brigade (see Jer. 51:20). Finally, they came in and occupied the place, which had been made for them in the British Isles by the Roman occupation. Since that time they have been not the least important part of the Israel peoples dwelling in the "appointed place" (the British Isles), and extending to the overseas dominions the strength and energy of their race.

It has been possible only to touch authorities and evidences of the identity of the Anglo-Saxons with ten-tribed Israel. But even so, the array of standard authors who make declarations regarding this matter is startling, and it is clear that the scholar who denies an historic basis to the claim of Saxon identity with Israel speaks rather out of his lack of knowledge of standard literature, than out of his knowledge of the subject.

The identity of the Saxon and Israel is proven, and we are now put in the responsible position of asking what it means in the way of responsibility under God's plan for His nation, and through them for the world. With Paul we ask, "What shall we say then? Hath God cast away His people whom He foreknew? God forbid ... God hath not cast away His people."
 
Upvote 0

Isreal

Newbie
Feb 3, 2012
118
3
✟22,770.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You've clearly missed the point of my argument. For much of this thread you and Isreal have been saying that Europeans are the only descendants of the lost tribes of Isreal. I've given you three examples which prove, using DNA analysis, that other groups of people in the world are also have Jewish roots.

The Israeli government consider the Bnei of India Jewish enough to be given citizenship in Israel. Their authority on who is Jewish and who is not is greater than yours.

I already discussed the origin of Adam's name here.
You can prove none of that. It's tainted studies and they tell you who they are and then push their DNA. Believe those Jewish fables.

You don't have ears to see the truth obviously. Pray that the lord reveals the hidden things to you.
 
Upvote 0

Isreal

Newbie
Feb 3, 2012
118
3
✟22,770.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, unorthodoxy in all its splendor does that, starting with their conclusion in this case English/Europeans are the only saved ones and going scurrying through the Scriptures to find proof deciding that the only thing they could draw from Scripture is that Israel is chosen therefore they believe Europeans are Israel. Please you had your theology from the get go, don't take me for a fool. I've rebuilt my theology from the Bible every single time I've read it cover to cover, the idea that Europeans are Israel is a twisting of Scripture in order to be racist when God has destroyed any barrier between the nations in acts 2
God destroyed the barriers though Christ said he came back specifically for the lost tribes of Israel and told the disciples to go only to the lost tribes? That isn't sound logic.
You people that want to believe the milk bottle tells of the mainstream churches just can't understand the simple promises to Abraham.

Jews have not fulfilled the promises to Abraham seed.
If Jews are really God chosen which they are not....
Then the prophecies have failed. Yah forbid


.
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Isreal said:
First off I'm not a her and my name is not Israel.
My apologies. I keep misspelling Israel and your username.

Isreal said:
# 4 had nothing to do with the name of Britian but pointing out the use of GREAT and Abrahams seed would have a Great Name. It can get no simpler than this and you still miss it missy.
As I already mentioned, on page 26 you wrote that the word British means "man of the covenant" and I pointed out that this wasn't the case. The real phrase was Ish brit.

The fact that Britain has the word "Great" in the title is nothing more than a coincidence. The Hebrew word used is probably Gadal / Gadol, which means "to expand, to become powerful - (link"). There have been plenty of empires and nation which match that description.
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Dagelos said:
Jews have mixed with everyone in the world,there is no Jewish race.
The Indian Jews are obviously followers of Judaism.
The London Jewish World of March 15, 1923 declared: "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."
Jews are not to be confused with Israelites.

You are confusing Jewish and Israel.
Israel did not migrate into Africa or Asia,they migrated into Europe.
Their marks are all over the place.
They are the only nations to accept Christianity.
I have already pointed out a) that DNA tests show many people from different regions have Jewish ancestry, b) why the terms "Jew" and "Israeli" are used interchangeably, c) there are more non-white Christians in the world today and d) that both Judaism and Christianity have their origins in the Middle East, not Europe.

Either you've missed by comments - which isn't very likely, since you quote them - or you're deliberately ignoring them because you have no answers.

Isreal said:
You can prove none of that. It's tainted studies and they tell you who they are and then push their DNA. Believe those Jewish fables.
So your response to any scientific inquiry you don't agree with is to instantly dismiss it as wrong? Good to know.
 
Upvote 0

dagelos

Newbie
Dec 31, 2011
199
2
✟339.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
No, unorthodoxy in all its splendor does that, starting with their conclusion in this case English/Europeans are the only saved ones and going scurrying through the Scriptures to find proof deciding that the only thing they could draw from Scripture is that Israel is chosen therefore they believe Europeans are Israel. Please you had your theology from the get go, don't take me for a fool. I've rebuilt my theology from the Bible every single time I've read it cover to cover, the idea that Europeans are Israel is a twisting of Scripture in order to be racist when God has destroyed any barrier between the nations in acts 2

Israel was taken in to Assyrian Captivity and lost their identity eventually migrating in to Europe.

If the Ten Tribes have disappeared, the literal fulfilment of the prophecies would be impossible; if they have not disappeared, obviously they must exist under a different name.
TRIBES, LOST TEN - JewishEncyclopedia.com

Matthew 21:43:Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

Barriers of races destroyed? passages?


Racism.......hmmmmmmmmm

Deuteronomy 7:1:When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;
Deuteronomy 7:2:And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:
Deuteronomy 7:3:Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.

Deuteronomy 23:2:A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance,Hebrew definition of Bastard...

4464 mamzer mam-zare' from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. born of a Jewish father and a heathen mother:--bastard.

Deuteronomy 23:3:An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever:

Exodus 17:14:And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.

Exodus 17:16:For he said, Because the LORD hath sworn that the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.

Malachi 1:2-3:2I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, 3And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.


Zechariah 14:21:Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the LORD of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.


Numbers 25:6-13:6And, behold, one of the children of Israel came and brought unto his brethren a Midianitish woman in the sight of Moses, and in the sight of all the congregation of the children of Israel, who were weeping before the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.
7And when Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, saw it, he rose up from among the congregation, and took a javelin in his hand;
8And he went after the man of Israel into the tent, and thrust both of them through, the man of Israel, and the woman through her belly. So the plague was stayed from the children of Israel.
9And those that died in the plague were twenty and four thousand.
10And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
11Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, hath turned my wrath away from the children of Israel, while he was zealous for my sake among them, that I consumed not the children of Israel in my jealousy.
12Wherefore say, Behold, I give unto him my covenant of peace:
13And he shall have it, and his seed after him, even the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.
 
Upvote 0

Keachian

On Sabbatical
Feb 3, 2010
7,096
331
36
Horse-lie-down
Visit site
✟31,352.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
God destroyed the barriers though Christ said he came back specifically for the lost tribes of Israel and told the disciples to go only to the lost tribes? That isn't sound logic.

In all other cases when the Bible talks of the sheep of the fold it's referencing all of Israel, now Christ is talking about another fold of sheep, it is quite obvious that he's not talking about the lost tribes, in the same way Christ says to go to all nations to make disciples, are you saying that the lost tribes gave up their faith?
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Dagelos said:
If the Ten Tribes have disappeared, the literal fulfilment of the prophecies would be impossible; if they have not disappeared, obviously they must exist under a different name.
Funny, your argument is the exact opposite of Isreal's. You say the prophecies have not been fulfilled because the tribes are not really "lost", they're just known by different names. Isreal on the other hand says the phrophecies have been fulfilled, but only by Europeans.

Isreal said:
All the skeptics here have never offered a single answer to these important promises made to Abraham and his seed ... There are many other promises. They have been fulfilled but not through Jews. Only England and her cubs have fulfilled these promises.

So not only do you disagree with us, you disagree with each other. Obviously you can't both be correct, so which one of you is wrong?
 
Upvote 0

Keachian

On Sabbatical
Feb 3, 2010
7,096
331
36
Horse-lie-down
Visit site
✟31,352.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Israel was taken in to Assyrian Captivity and lost their identity eventually migrating in to Europe.

If the Ten Tribes have disappeared, the literal fulfilment of the prophecies would be impossible; if they have not disappeared, obviously they must exist under a different name.
TRIBES, LOST TEN - JewishEncyclopedia.com

Matthew 21:43:Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

Barriers of races destroyed? passages?


Racism.......hmmmmmmmmm

Deuteronomy 7:1:When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;
Deuteronomy 7:2:And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:
Deuteronomy 7:3:Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.

Deuteronomy 23:2:A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance,Hebrew definition of Bastard...

4464 mamzer mam-zare' from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. born of a Jewish father and a heathen mother:--bastard.

Deuteronomy 23:3:An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever:

Exodus 17:14:And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.

Exodus 17:16:For he said, Because the LORD hath sworn that the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.

Malachi 1:2-3:2I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, 3And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.


Zechariah 14:21:Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the LORD of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.


Numbers 25:6-13:6And, behold, one of the children of Israel came and brought unto his brethren a Midianitish woman in the sight of Moses, and in the sight of all the congregation of the children of Israel, who were weeping before the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.
7And when Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, saw it, he rose up from among the congregation, and took a javelin in his hand;
8And he went after the man of Israel into the tent, and thrust both of them through, the man of Israel, and the woman through her belly. So the plague was stayed from the children of Israel.
9And those that died in the plague were twenty and four thousand.
10And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
11Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, hath turned my wrath away from the children of Israel, while he was zealous for my sake among them, that I consumed not the children of Israel in my jealousy.
12Wherefore say, Behold, I give unto him my covenant of peace:
13And he shall have it, and his seed after him, even the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.

Yep, passages concerning the separation of religion from the surrounding nations are really supporting your theology.
 
Upvote 0

dagelos

Newbie
Dec 31, 2011
199
2
✟339.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I have already pointed out a) that DNA tests show many people from different regions have Jewish ancestry, b) why the terms "Jew" and "Israeli" are used interchangeably, c) there are more non-white Christians in the world today and d) that both Judaism and Christianity have their origins in the Middle East, not Europe.

Either you've missed by comments - which isn't very likely, since you quote them - or you're deliberately ignoring them because you have no answers.


So your response to any scientific inquiry you don't agree with is to instantly dismiss it as wrong? Good to know.

Look up the word Jew in a Strong's concordance.

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." 1980 Jewish Almanac, P.3

YOU ARE CONFUSING THE WORD JEW AND ISRAEL.
You are confusing them with the modern meaning,you even refer to Israel as ''Israeli'' - MODERN

You are missing the point,Israel from the Assyrian captivity migrated into Europe,forming White nations.
If there are non whites they are not from the Israel migrations.
I think we once discussed Christianity been a white Religion?

Judaism is not the Religion of the Bible.
There were already Israel people in Europe.

Matthew 21:43:Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

Who was the nation bringing forth the fruits?

John 7:35:Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will he go, that we shall not find him? will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?

Who were the dispersed?

Dispersed in Strong's Greek...

1290. diaspora dee-as-por-ah' from 1289; dispersion, i.e. (specially and concretely) the (converted) Israelite resident in Gentile countries:--(which are) scattered (abroad).

''diaspora'' - ''Israelite resident in Gentile countries''

Gentile in Strong's Greek...

1672. Hellen hel'-lane from 1671; a Hellen (Grecian) or inhabitant of Hellas; by extension a Greek-speaking person, especially a non-Jew:-- Gentile, Greek.

''Greek. ''

John 11:52:And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad.
 
Upvote 0

dagelos

Newbie
Dec 31, 2011
199
2
✟339.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Yep, passages concerning the separation of religion from the surrounding nations are really supporting your theology.

Read the passages again,carefully.

Do you have passages on the separation of races?


Matthew 7:6:Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

Matthew 15:26-27:26But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. 27And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.






Matthew 21:43:Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.




Who was the nation bringing forth the fruits?
 
Upvote 0

Isreal

Newbie
Feb 3, 2012
118
3
✟22,770.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In all other cases when the Bible talks of the sheep of the fold it's referencing all of Israel, now Christ is talking about another fold of sheep, it is quite obvious that he's not talking about the lost tribes, in the same way Christ says to go to all nations to make disciples, are you saying that the lost tribes gave up their faith?
The lost tribes had been enslaved for generations so they may have lost some Faith. The New covenant had to be taken to them.

Christ told the disciples to go ONLY to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Don't tone it down.. So did he contradict himself when he told them to go into all nations?
 
Upvote 0

Isreal

Newbie
Feb 3, 2012
118
3
✟22,770.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So your response to any scientific inquiry you don't agree with is to instantly dismiss it as wrong? Good to know.
No. I don't swallow Jewish lies and fables.


Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
 
Upvote 0

Keachian

On Sabbatical
Feb 3, 2010
7,096
331
36
Horse-lie-down
Visit site
✟31,352.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
The lost tribes had been enslaved for generations so they may have lost some Faith. The New covenant had to be taken to them.
I don't disagree with this

Christ told the disciples to go ONLY to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Don't tone it down.. So did he contradict himself when he told them to go into all nations?
Reference?
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Dagelos said:
Look up the word Jew in a Strong's concordance.

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." 1980 Jewish Almanac, P.3
That line is often quote-mined. The author continues by saying "But let the definer beware: original meanings of these loaded words are no guide to subsequent meanings".

There's a picture of the page from the Jewish Almanac 1980 here: link.
You'll probably need to zoom in to read it.

Isreal said:
No. I don't swallow Jewish lies and fables.
The tests on the African Lembas were conducted by British scientists, including a professor from the university of London. The tests on the Taliban were carried out by Indians, headed by Dr. Navras Afreedi. One Jewish scholar, Meir Javednafar, actually dismissed his findings.

But really - you think any science you disagree with are "Jewish lies"?
Wow ...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

dagelos

Newbie
Dec 31, 2011
199
2
✟339.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The Kingdom of God does, I have allegiance to there before any allegiance to any man!

Read Matthew 21:43:Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.


Who was the ''nation'' ?

Nation in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance,Greek defined as...

1484. ethnos eth'-nos probably from 1486; a race (as of the same habit), i.e. a tribe; specially, a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually, by implication, pagan):--Gentile, heathen, nation, people.
 
Upvote 0

dagelos

Newbie
Dec 31, 2011
199
2
✟339.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That line is often quote-mined. The author continues by saying "But let the definer beware: original meanings of these loaded words are no guide to subsequent meanings".

There's a picture of the page from the Jewish Almanac 1980 here: link.
You'll probably need to zoom in to read it.


The tests on the African Lembas were conducted by British scientists, including a professor from the university of London. The tests on the Taliban were carried out by Indians, headed by Dr. Navras Afreedi. One Jewish scholar, Meir Javednafar, actually dismissed his findings.

But really - you think any science you disagree with are "Jewish lies"?
Wow ...

Why don't you look at that link that you posted,you may have to zoom in ''the first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all''


"The American people have been led to believe that Jews are "God's chosen people." This myth was started by a small group of Jews. A few Jewish leaders took excerpts from the Bible and interpreted them to mean that God designated them as "chosen people."
"Leading the cry, `We are God's Chosen People,' are the Zionist/Marxist (Ashkenazi) Jews who for political purposes chose Judaism and who don't have a drop of biblical Jewish blood in them. "The Judeo-Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is a big joke - the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.
"I'll toss in one last thought about the `God's chosen people' myth: God said, `Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are not, for they lie.' Could it be the Ashkenazi Jews are the people to whom God was referring?"_Jack Bernstein, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (California: The Noontide Press, 1984)




Matthew 21:43:Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.


Who was the nation bringing forth the fruits?
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
dagelos said:
"The American people have been led to believe that Jews are "God's chosen people." This myth was started by a small group of Jews. A few Jewish leaders took excerpts from the Bible and interpreted them to mean that God designated them as "chosen people."
"Leading the cry, `We are God's Chosen People,' are the Zionist/Marxist (Ashkenazi) Jews who for political purposes chose Judaism and who don't have a drop of biblical Jewish blood in them. "The Judeo-Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is a big joke - the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.
"I'll toss in one last thought about the `God's chosen people' myth: God said, `Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are not, for they lie.' Could it be the Ashkenazi Jews are the people to whom God was referring?"_Jack Bernstein, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (California: The Noontide Press, 1984)

I don't quite see what point you're trying to make. As the author himself points out, many aggressive Zionists "don't have a drop of Biblical Jewish blood in them".

Writing in huge fonts doesn't make your argument any more valid either
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.