R
rikerjoe
Guest
Really? I guess you only have one then, since life expectancy is more than 80 years in 31 countries! The top one is 89.68 years! (Monaco)
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have two. [...]
The average life expectancy which has never exceeded 80 years, and is usually much less.
Thankfuly Habakkuk didn't have to fill his car up with petroleum. Or power his computer with coal-generated electricity.
Times were simpler then. Everyone took a hike. All the time.
thats kinda funny
hiking...
BTW nuclear energy is way more efficient.
(just make your nuke facility bomb proof, literally)
(like sandiego's)
but that is beside the point,
funny post,
According to the storyline, Noah's FLOOD killed everyone on the planet except for the few on the Ark. If that's true, then how do you account for cultures and peoples writing about a great flood, unless they were writing about a local flood?
How do you explain that???
I did not understand your comment,
can you expand?
thanks
Just what I suspected. Either you have real low reading comprehension skills, (which would be direct reflection of your intelligence), or, you're intentionally lying. Which is it?
OOOOOOOHHHHHH
I get it now.
Not that I am slow,
My whole argument lies in the fact that the telephone game line of reasoning regarding story telling is in effect here.
Natural selection will never produce in a being anything injurious to itself[n a being? I thought it was populations that evolved, not individuals. To the point where individual have to be sacrificed for the benefit of the population or the community.
That's awesome. You realize that Darwin was familiar with extinctions, right?
Natural selection will never produce in a being anything injurious to itself, for natural selection acts solely by and for the good of each. No organ will be formed, as Paley has remarked, for the purpose of causing pain or for doing an injury to its possessor. If a fair balance be struck between the good and evil caused by each part, each will be found on the whole advantageous. After the lapse of time, under changing conditions of life, if any part comes to be injurious, it will be modified; or if it be not so, the being will become extinct, as myriads have become extinct.
Darwin - Origin
Where Genesis 1 or 2 does it mention 6 different extinctions? Where does it mention the Cambrian Explosion? Was it Gen. 1:20 where it describes the 5th day and life in the seas and the air? It can't be because there were no fish, much less whales in the Cambrian and birds wouldn't evolve for another 400 million years.
No, you don't. You don't even know why that happened. Your investigation into that has been as shallow as any of your attempt to understand science.
Kinda like saying the Bible is wrong without having read It, isn't it?He has been provided a link to the Rogers Commission Report several times. The fact that he continues troll C&E and mention science/scientists in conjunction with his perverse grave dancing on the brave Challenger dead, tells us he didn't read it.
Kinda like saying the Bible is wrong without having read It, isn't it?
Except that most people who claim the Bible is wrong have actually read it.
Kinda like saying the Bible is wrong without having read It, isn't it?
Not really, they usually spend five or ten minutes on skeptics and scoffers dot com and they think that makes them an expert. The enemy has come to steal, kill and destroy. He is the father of lies and he is able to teach lies to those that are deceived. "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10Except that most people who claim the Bible is wrong have actually read it.
The fact that AV didn't respond with "I did read it" is yet another indicator that he hasn't and has no intention on doing so.
Not really, they usually spend five or ten minutes on skeptics and scoffers dot com and they think that makes them an expert. The enemy has come to steal, kill and destroy. He is the father of lies and he is able to teach lies to those that are deceived. "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10
If he has made a conscious decision to make himself look a fool over and over again, even when told how to correct the fault, there isn't much anyone can do about it.
Indeed.Some of us have decided to take a proactive approach.
This message is hidden because AV1611VET is on your ignore list.
I wish others would do the same.
So? what's your point?Except that most people who claim the Bible is wrong have actually read it.
I didn't read it, and I have no intention of doing so.The fact that AV didn't respond with "I did read it" is yet another indicator that he hasn't and has no intention on doing so.
In addition, even if they did read it, I believe this parable applies ...Not really, they usually spend five or ten minutes on skeptics and scoffers dot com and they think that makes them an expert. The enemy has come to steal, kill and destroy. He is the father of lies and he is able to teach lies to those that are deceived. "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?