Do you want to see Intelligent Design taught in universities and schools?

yeshuaslavejeff said:

Forget "theories". They don't help one to find the truth. Rejecting them does not help either (when you think of something as a theory, and reject it, if it is not a theory then it is like falling into a hole dug by self.) ....

Yahuweh Says Clearly in His Word what He DOES to those who trust people's testimonies contrary to and instead of trusting Him. (He curses them, even if they are 'believers').

Thus, as often happens, "a new light" is "a way that seems right", and leads to destruction.

The only hope for people is to turn to Yahuweh, and trust Him (not men and not new ideas).

When people say "I am certain", yet are believing a cult/ error/ there is little anyone is able to do for them other than pray IF the Father directs such prayer. Even Jesus Said Plainly "NOT for everyone DO I PRAY....." .... and again it is written "there is a sin that leads to death. I do not say to pray for those..." "There is a sin that does not lead to death" (pray for these) .....

Click to expand...

RDKirk said:

This is what I've believed since the mid-60s, and I've seen and heard nothing to change my mind. I developed the concept of ID for myself even though I'd never heard the term before.

Part of that influence was, ironically, the nature movies Disney had put out a few years earlier showing nature through the then-revolutionary time lapse photography. Using time-lapse cinematography, movies such as "The Vanishing Prairie" appeared to show plants appear instantly and magically from a dead landscape.

It occurred to me that if the natural theories of the creation of the universe were seen in a series of enormously time-lapsed dreams (four billion years compressed into six nightly dreams) from the point of view of the normal human eyes (no telescopic vision, no microscopic vision, no ability to see into deep oceans) of a Bronze Age man, the story would look very much like what Genesis presents.

Click to expand...

"There will be a sudden rush to buy farms, ranches, and homes in the country.

Thousands will attempt to flee from cities, hoping that a return to the land and

nature will provide security. There will be a growing urge to "get away from it

all"---and much money will be invested in land and acreage in rural areas by

people who have secret dreams of raising their own food and cattle and of

becoming self-supporting. The price of open rural land will continue to soar.

Acreage within 100 miles of most major cities will skyrocket out of reach to

all but syndicates." (David Wilkerson, The Vision, page 18,19).

Click to expand...

Miles said:

I'd like to see science taught in a dispassionate way. No sneaking in disparaging remarks about anybody's faith or lack thereof. Science is agnostic, not atheistic or theistic. One person sees the universe as evidence of a creator (as I do). Yet another person regards that very same universe as evidence that there isn't a creator. A science classroom isn't the right environment to push such theological or philosophical views on others. Those who do so, whether theistic or atheistic, aren't being very scientific. It's a place to learn about science, not theology. If you disagree with current theories about how the universe works, develop new hypotheses, test them, and maybe publish your findings if you have the time or the inclination.

Click to expand...