Agreed.Arrogance is ugly.
Rudeness is ugly.
Dishonesty is ugly.
"The need to appear right is the sign of a vulgar mind."
- William James
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Agreed.Arrogance is ugly.
Rudeness is ugly.
Dishonesty is ugly.
"The need to appear right is the sign of a vulgar mind."
- William James
That's like saying numbers were created because they weren't drawn for a long time.
Actually, no. You must be misunderstanding me.
The numbers one, two, three... (or 1, 2, 3...) are labels for numerical values. They aren't the values themselves. They are how we utter or write them down. Words are similar to that, except that the labels refer to concepts, not values.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Did you catch my other posts? What did you think?
Which ones? I replied to the OP in post #3.
eudaimonia,
Mark
The ones on words and ideas.
It´s a perfect example for what I am trying to communicate: Thoughts/concepts don´t necessarily require words.No, it's not. That's not the same as there not being a word for it.
That's like saying numbers were created because they weren't drawn for a long time.
And that's a problem how?
In what way?
Because numbers existed before there was a way to express numbers.
Because numbers existed before there was a way to express numbers.
Except in poetry....The word isn't the concept, it is a label for the concept....
No they didn't. Numbers are part of a language created by humans to communicate certain ideas. For example : http://www.livescience.com/27853-who-invented-zero.html
Except in poetry.
I'm referring to what the symbols symbolize.
I was thinking this morning -yes, it does happen sometimes-, and realized that I was certain of the metaphysical dimension of Man, thanks to the language. I explain myself:
As the only being gifted by the language, Man as an incredibly ability: to make things "exist" in his mind -the conceptual thinking. Well in fact I would prefer "in-sist" (while this word is not a correct word, I know) rather than "exist": to make things appear inside the mind and not outside. The ability of creating, in a mind, an object which is not there. Yes, of course, an object that he already knew. However, he can do that above the physical dimension. So, to me, this is clear that man is metaphysical. I was even considering that the metaphysical mind could be more real than the physical body: "I think so I am". I speak, so I am. I could consider everything physical as an illusion. I could consider the human body as an illusion, while I could not for the human brain and conceptual thinking.
It adds a spiritual (not necessary religious) dimension of Man, dimension that still can be contested.
As this explanation surely has a lot of defects and weaknesses, I wanted you to criticize and discuss the question. Are you convinced that Man is the only metaphysical being, and are you even convinced that a metaphysical dimension exists (or in-sists? Sorry, I truly do not like to match exist with the metaphysic)
So, to me, this is clear that man is metaphysical.
In the mathematical way.Did they? In what way?