Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No! As a Christian it is a sin of the flesh and not a transgression of the because the law isn't applicable to the Christian per I Tim 1:9-10. The law doesn't apply or have jurisdiction over the Christian.
Please read Romans 7:-25 for an answer. I've already presented and discussed that in this thread.What does that even mean? So my flesh is sinning but my soul isn't? Is that what you're trying to say?
So who are you addressing? Are you demanding the flesh conform to the Spirit for one to be redeemed? That is foolishness according to Gal 3:1-3. If that isn't good enough I refer you to the same Romans 7:8-25 as my previous post.Col 3:5 Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: 6 For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: 7 In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them.
What do you think of this? Does this scripture say that works of the flesh are actually idolatry? Or is it just covetousness that is idolatry? Its not clear.
Yeah, and yet you still don't get it. Go fig...
Been here already. The laws surrounding sacrifices were nailed to the cross. Of course, from this translation, one could aptly argue that that which was nailed to the cross, was the legal demand, which was death for the transgressor.
Col 3:5 Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: 6 For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: 7 In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them.
What do you think of this? Does this scripture say that works of the flesh are actually idolatry? Or is it just covetousness that is idolatry? Its not clear.
So who are you addressing? Are you demanding the flesh conform to the Spirit for one to be redeemed? That is foolishness according to Gal 3:1-3. If that isn't good enough I refer you to the same Romans 7:8-25 as my previous post.
My little bro, don't you yet understand what scratch is saying to you?
Please listen to us, so u can leave the elemental side of this argument, that you keep pointing to. God bless.
Well thanks. I don't know what you wish me to say or consider. Are you trying to say that Paul commanded the Corinthians to follow the law and told the Hebres to follow faith as something different? Or are you calling them the same thing?Here you go scratch i figured out the shortcut.
http://www.christianforums.com/t7563454-85/#post57646857
Indeed I did. This is a long way from saying that I can't make a living period because of that fact. The day of prepreation does interfere with the normal flow of things and requires a half day to be prepared for the sabbath. This means a half day off from work in normal routine. It doesn't matter to me if you think so or not.Things get complicated, but they're not unmanageable. And why do you keep trying to make it out like I said you can't make a living. You said the following: One must abstain from purssing a livelyhood to keep from sinning on the sabbath according to the meaning and concept.
Indeed God honors them that honor Him. In my relationship with God I believe He (Holy Spirit) spoke to me and said that it isn't my covenant. You know my stand on covenant(s).That aside, God honor's those who honor Him. The cattle on 1k hills is His and so are the hills. God takes care of us no matter what society we live in. Who can say no when God says yes? Who can say yes when God says no?
I have no idea why you think my idea of the sabbath is twisted other than I don't keep it as it isn't a requirement of, in and from the NC. I don't understand your insistance of obligation to a superceded law.This is your twisted understanding of the sabbath. Not mine. The fact that our society is different then the one that Israel lived in is quite true. There are things that are essential to daily life. Those things keep going on during the sabbath. Jesus qualified what type of work was good to do on the sabbath. This is a non-argument. Remember that whole, rule behind a rule, under a rule, surrounded by a fence of rules with a rule moot going around it? Your post displays that point perfectly.
Well thanks. I don't know what you wish me to say or consider. Are you trying to say that Paul commanded the Corinthians to follow the law and told the Hebres to follow faith as something different? Or are you calling them the same thing?
I don't read a command in either. Does this mean that I say or imply one can sin? NO! Gal 5:13, 19-21.
I think that's a great quesion. I would like to know as well. I've addressed that issue in the past with no response.Where does it say sacrifces in the verse?
What translation would u prefer?
HOW WERE THE SACRIFICES THE LEGAL DEMANDS THAT WERE AGAINST US?
English Standard Version (©2001)
by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross.
New American Standard Bible (©1995)
having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.
Darby Bible Translation
having effaced the handwriting in ordinances which stood out against us, which was contrary to us, he has taken it also out of the way, having nailed it to the cross
Young's Literal Translation
having blotted out the handwriting in the ordinances that is against us, that was contrary to us, and he hath taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross;
I think it is more like instruction in righteousness than a demand or command to folllow a set of rules. Please check the language structure and show by discussion that it is a commandment or a demand for performance.What is paul teaching if not Gods will? You mistakenly suggest that posting or learning instruction in obedience to Gods will according to the word is wrong. That instruction in Gods will is there for us to learn.
I think it is more like instruction in righteousness than a demand or command to folllow a set of rules. Please check the language structure and show by discussion that it is a commandment or a demand for performance.
I think it is more like instruction in righteousness than a demand or command to folllow a set of rules. Please check the language structure and show by discussion that it is a commandment or a demand for performance.
Circumcision isn't a custom of Moses. It is a requirement of God to participate in the commanded observance of Passover observed by the nation of Israel. circumcision has absolutely nothing to do with Moses per say.A custom of Moses is not a law.. it is a tradition...
to an Isrealite no circumcision meant no God and no country.Circumcision has never been about salvation. It is the sign of a covenant, like a marriage ring...
Yes it is the instructions in righteousness, and by love we can follow under the guidance of His Word and His Holy Spirit...I think it is more like instruction in righteousness than a demand or command to folllow a set of rules. Please check the language structure and show by discussion that it is a commandment or a demand for performance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?