• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do we need to be baptized in order to be saved ?

Jun 26, 2003
8,915
1,530
Visit site
✟301,885.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
In my experience, the answer is Yes and No. Yes....for the Pentecostals and Charismatics. Practicing the more spectactuar gifts is what they call the Baptism of the HS. For many others who are non-charismatics....BofHS is synomous with conversion w/o baptism.

In Acts 19 we read of two baptisms, the one of John and the one of Jesus. Jesus Himself says in John’s gospel that we must be born of water and the spirt to enter the kingdom of God.

Neither baptism is the be all and end all of the Faith. Again in Acts 19 we read that Paul had to remain exhorting and disputing with them and some left the faith. Others tried to cast out demons on their own but were beaten by the demon. Both baptisms are real and a vital part of Christian faith, but they do not take the place of proper catechesis.

In Catholic theology we have water baptism as a rite of initiation into the faith, then the sacrament of confirmation is given to those that profess the faith and have been catechized. Those receive the gifts of the Holy Spirt.

Being born again involves more than faith alone. When one is born again, it is not only faith or by faith it is received, rather Faith, Hope, and Charity, but the greatest of these is Charity aka divine love. 1 Cor 13 says Faith alone is nothing and James 2 says Faith without works is dead

Now I grant you that Catholic theology in the 20th and sometimes in the 21st century is poorly catechized, watered down and minimally implemented. That does not take away from the truth that it conveys
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,450
2,379
Perth
✟203,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Obviously you don't know scripture very well.
I went to the trouble of reading Luke 3:21-22 before I replied. Jesus was baptised and the Holy Spirit descended upon him.

Now when all the people were baptized, Jesus was also baptized, and while He was praying, heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit descended upon Him in bodily form like a dove, and a voice came out of heaven, "You are My beloved Son, in You I am well-pleased." (Luke 3:21-22 NASB)

And in my reply, here, I didn't need to call your knowledge of holy scripture into question, as you did mine.
I will not debate your claims to personal experiences. It is beyond my experience; I wasn't there and didn't see or hear. I'll stick with Luke 3:21-22 and its testimony to Jesus receiving the Holy Spirit at his baptism.
 
Upvote 0

Dan Perez

Well-Known Member
Dec 13, 2018
4,318
364
88
Arcadia
✟256,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"Our" theology reflects the example of Jesus in scripture. He received the filling of The Holy Spirit after He was water immersed. We follow His example and have the same experience.
What verse are you using and where is the Greek word , IMMERSED , used as I have yet to fnd it ??

Ypur thoughts that verse , Acts 1:5 ??

dan p
 
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
14,290
1,936
60
✟222,162.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
I went to the trouble of reading Luke 3:21-22 before I replied. Jesus was baptised and the Holy Spirit descended upon him.

Now when all the people were baptized, Jesus was also baptized, and while He was praying, heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit descended upon Him in bodily form like a dove, and a voice came out of heaven, "You are My beloved Son, in You I am well-pleased." (Luke 3:21-22 NASB)

And in my reply, here, I didn't need to call your knowledge of holy scripture into question, as you did mine.
I needed to call your knowledge of scripture into question because you didn't pay attention very well,....

Luk 3:21 Now it came to pass, when all the people were baptized, that, Jesus also having been baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,
Luk 3:22 and the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily form, as a dove, upon him, and a voice came out of heaven, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.


This is the Revised Version of 1881, a very literal critical text version.

Notice it was after Jesus was water immersed that He prayed and The Holy Spirit "then" descended upon Him in bodily form. This did not happen as he was being water immersed, it was a time very shortly after when He prayed.

This is what you said,...

"there's no implied break in time between his baptism and the filling with the Holy Spirit."

When the text absolutely identifies a break between His water Immersion from John and when The Holy Spirit came upon Him and filed Him. So yes, your knowledge of scripture and your ability to pay attention to details in it should be called into question.

I will not debate your claims to personal experiences. It is beyond my experience; I wasn't there and didn't see or hear. I'll stick with Luke 3:21-22 and its testimony to Jesus receiving the Holy Spirit at his baptism.

Again, Jesus did not receive The Holy Spirit at His water immersion according to scripture, it was after. Again, attention to detail.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,450
2,379
Perth
✟203,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I needed to call your knowledge of scripture into question because you didn't pay attention very well,....
Why do you persist in personal attacks such as calling my knowledge of scripture into question, it is at best rude of you to do. Anyway here, take a moment to read what is written about Jesus' baptism:
In those days Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. Immediately coming up out of the water, He saw the heavens opening, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him; and a voice came out of the heavens: "You are My beloved Son, in You I am well-pleased." (Mark 1:9-11 NASB)​

Then Jesus *arrived from Galilee at the Jordan coming to John, to be baptized by him. But John tried to prevent Him, saying, "I have need to be baptized by You, and do You come to me?" But Jesus answering said to him, "Permit it at this time; for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness." Then he *permitted Him. After being baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and lighting on Him, and behold, a voice out of the heavens said, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well-pleased." (Matthew 3:13-17 NASB)​
Immediately does not imply some span of time between Jesus' baptism and the reception of the Holy Spirit. So, if Jesus' baptism is to be taken as the example for believers to follow then the expectation must be of an immediate reception of the Holy Spirit following baptism.
This is the Revised Version of 1881, a very literal critical text version.
I think it was published in 1885, but the New Testament may have been published in 1881.
Again, Jesus did not receive The Holy Spirit at His water immersion according to scripture, it was after. Again, attention to detail.
I refer you to Mark 1:9-11 and Matthew 3:13-17.
 
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
14,290
1,936
60
✟222,162.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Why do you persist in personal attacks such as calling my knowledge of scripture into question, it is at best rude of you to do. Anyway here, take a moment to read what is written about Jesus' baptism:
In those days Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. Immediately coming up out of the water, He saw the heavens opening, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him; and a voice came out of the heavens: "You are My beloved Son, in You I am well-pleased." (Mark 1:9-11 NASB)​

Then Jesus *arrived from Galilee at the Jordan coming to John, to be baptized by him. But John tried to prevent Him, saying, "I have need to be baptized by You, and do You come to me?" But Jesus answering said to him, "Permit it at this time; for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness." Then he *permitted Him. After being baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and lighting on Him, and behold, a voice out of the heavens said, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well-pleased." (Matthew 3:13-17 NASB)​
Oh I see, you didn't like Luke's account so now you are trying to utilize the other gospels instead. Notice they both mention how Jesus came up "out of the water" first then He was filled with The Spirit.

Jesus did not receive The Holy Spirit when He was in the water. That was the point that you was trying to fool people with.


Immediately does not imply some span of time between Jesus' baptism and the reception of the Holy Spirit. So, if Jesus' baptism is to be taken as the example for believers to follow then the expectation must be of an immediate reception of the Holy Spirit following baptism.

Is it?

The examples in scripture of a person receiving The Holy Spirit is the gifts operating through them, ie the gift of tongues or prophesying. Did you have that happen after you were water immersed?

I don't expect anyone here to have had that happen. If Jesus had to pray for the filling of The Holy Spirit first, then we need to also. I had to.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,450
2,379
Perth
✟203,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Oh I see, you didn't like Luke's account so now you are trying to utilize the other gospels instead. Notice they both mention how Jesus came up "out of the water" first then He was filled with The Spirit.
I rightly count them all to be inspired by God and to add to our understanding of what happened; what would be the point of restricting our knowledge to the verses in saint Luke's gospel when we know that saints Mark and Matthew write of the same event and add further information from which we may benefit. So, I shall gladly use the scriptures because they are inspired, and they are there.
The examples in scripture of a person receiving The Holy Spirit is the gifts operating through them, ie the gift of tongues or prophesying. Did you have that happen after you were water immersed?
This is not so, our Lord and Saviour did not speak in tongues immediately after receiving the Holy Spirit, and since Jesus is our Lord and we are to follow him, his example is the better way to go. What others who are not our Saviour did is not the example we are called to follow even though their experiences do instruct us and help us to understand the variety that is present in God's grace towards us.
I don't expect anyone here to have had that happen. If Jesus had to pray for the filling of The Holy Spirit first, then we need to also.
Jesus prayed but the passage doesn't teach that Jesus prayed for the gift of tongues and the text doesn't say that Jesus spoke in tongues. That is a presupposition of your Pentecostal/Charismatic theology, and when you seek to apply it to all you are engaging in eisegesis.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,450
2,379
Perth
✟203,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Again,..... you don't know scripture (go ahead, be offended).
If you could take the time not to be offensive, then there'd be no cause for office.
Only 7 of the OT gifts of The Spirit were available before the glorification of Jesus. Once Jesus was seated at the right of The Father, and was granted The Holy Spirit to pour out, 2 additional gifts were added to the 7 for a total of 9. The gift of tongues and the gift of interpretation of tongues were not OT gifts, they were NT gifts.
seven out of nine, eh? What do you say are the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit under the Old Testament?
And what are the nine gifts of the Holy Spirit under the New Testament?
 
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
14,290
1,936
60
✟222,162.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
seven out of nine, eh? What do you say are the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit under the Old Testament?
And what are the nine gifts of the Holy Spirit under the New Testament?

You know,..... a few years back I would have enjoyed spending a portion of my time explaining my position and understanding on such a subject to such a person as yourself in hopes that you might pick up some of the things I've learned, but over time I also learned that a person such as yourself, a traditionalist type Christian, has already written such subjects like this off as completely unnecessary.

In other words, I could explain myself till I'm blue in the face, but you would just scoff at my posts and basically spit in my face in the end.

This is why I try not to enter into many debates with you traditionalist types anymore because there is always that battle between scripture and tradition with you guys.

It's better sometimes anyways to just wait till we all die and find out who was right in the end.
 
Upvote 0

Ain't Zwinglian

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2020
1,273
804
Oregon
✟167,769.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Yes it is required, but it is not the whole faith
There is more to it
What do mean by the "whole faith"? Do you have the whole faith.....more so than everybody else? Please educate us here at CF what is the "whole faith". Do you have more of it than others?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,450
2,379
Perth
✟203,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
You know,..... a few years back I would have enjoyed spending a portion of my time explaining my position and understanding on such a subject to such a person as yourself in hopes that you might pick up some of the things I've learned, but over time I also learned that a person such as yourself, a traditionalist type Christian, has already written such subjects like this off as completely unnecessary.
I have never counted any gifts in the Old Testament.
In other words, I could explain myself till I'm blue in the face, but you would just scoff at my posts and basically spit in my face in the end.
So far, I have avoided insulting you with gratuitous remarks on your bible knowledge while you haven't extended a similar courtesy to me.
This is why I try not to enter into many debates with you traditionalist types anymore because there is always that battle between scripture and tradition with you guys.
I like tradition (church teaching), and I like scripture too.
It's better sometimes anyways to just wait till we all die and find out who was right in the end.
The testimony of the grave is powerful indeed, eh?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
363
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And when I read Col 2: 12 , it read , having been BURIED together with Him in the BATISMA is in the DATIVE case , in the

Singular , in the Neuter , meaning Male and Female .

The Greek word is NOT BAPTISM and the Greek for WATER // HUDOR is not in the Greek text !!

dan p
Dan, we have been through this over and over. The Greek word "baptisma" is the Greek noun that is the counterpoint for the Greek verb "baptismo". "Baptisma" means "immersion", and "baptismo" means "to immerse".

Further, the Greek "hudor" does not need to be here. There is only one baptism in the NT Church (Eph 4:5-6), and that one baptism must include water because 1 Pet 3:21 says that baptism in water (like the Flood) is what saves us today, and the baptism that saves us (Mark 16:16) must be done by the human teacher (Matt 28:19) of the new disciple.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,915
1,530
Visit site
✟301,885.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
What do mean by the "whole faith"? Do you have the whole faith.....more so than everybody else? Please educate us here at CF what is the "whole faith". Do you have more of it than others?
I have what God has given me. Faith, Hope, and Charity. I do not glory myself above others here. You are all God’s children and He loves you very much. You ask a good question. We need to define what the faith is exactly. There seem to be many variations.

The Christian life is a call to mortification of our fleshly desires. Jesus says, if any man come after me, he must deny his very self, take up his cross and begin to follow in my footsteps.

We all know that works do not save us, but one cannot be saved without doing works. I see no where in the Bible where Jesus says just believe in me and do nothing, I got this. So many times I hear people say, we can’t do works, works are useless, it’s faith alone. That sounds good, but it is a deception. It is a change in the faith that was not taught for the 2000 year history of the Church.

Our actions should be spurred on by our love for Christ. We may not reach perfection, but we should aim for it. We do not just take baptism and then remain in our sin as if nothing changes. As Paul says, shall we sin more, so that grace may more abound? God forbid!

When we are born again, we are given the three theological virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity. They are called theological because they come from God alone and cannot be obtained by human effort. These are given at baptism, when we accept the Faith

We get faith to know that God is and is a rewarder of those that diligently seek Him. Hope that He will complete the work that He has begun in us. Holiness is not a fantasy, it is readily obtainable in this life by and through the grace of God. Finally we get Charity that is a deep love for God and a desire to please Him. We know this because Jesus says, if you love me, keep my commandments.

The faith is a journey, a walk. It is not one and done. Jesus says strive to enter the narrow gate, for narrow is the way, straight is the gate that leads to life. Few there be that find it. The Christian life is beautifully described by St John of the Cross from the 16th century

From a Spiritual Canticle of St John of the Cross


Recognising the mystery hidden within Christ Jesus


Though holy doctors have uncovered many mysteries and wonders, and devout souls have understood them in this earthly condition of ours, yet the greater part still remains to be unfolded by them, and even to be understood by them.


We must then dig deeply in Christ. He is like a rich mine with many pockets containing treasures: however deep we dig we will never find their end or their limit. Indeed, in every pocket new seams of fresh riches are discovered on all sides.


For this reason the apostle Paul said of Christ: In him are hidden all the treasures of the wisdom and knowledge of God. The soul cannot enter into these treasures, nor attain them, unless it first crosses into and enters the thicket of suffering, enduring interior and exterior labours, and unless it first receives from God very many blessings in the intellect and in the senses, and has undergone long spiritual training.


All these are lesser things, disposing the soul for the lofty sanctuary of the knowledge of the mysteries of Christ: this is the highest wisdom attainable in this life.


Would that men might come at last to see that it is quite impossible to reach the thicket of the riches and wisdom of God except by first entering the thicket of much suffering, in such a way that the soul finds there its consolation and desire. The soul that longs for divine wisdom chooses first, and in truth, to enter the thicket of the cross.


Saint Paul therefore urges the Ephesians not to grow weary in the midst of tribulations, but to be steadfast and rooted and grounded in love, so that they may know with all the saints the breadth, the length, the height and the depth – to know what is beyond knowledge, the love of Christ, so as to be filled with all the fullness of God.


The gate that gives entry into these riches of his wisdom is the cross; because it is a narrow gate, while many seek the joys that can be gained through it, it is given to few to desire to pass through it.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
363
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
These passages of Scripture state that salvation is received when one believes. (John 1:12; 3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:40,47; 11:25,26; Acts 10:43; 13:39; 16:31; Romans 1:16; 4:5; 10:4; 1 Corinthians 1:21; 1 John 5:13 etc..). Nothing here about moving towards salvation but not there yet/more is requited.
Not a single one of these mentions belief in the English connotation of "intellectual assent". Every one of these passages uses the Greek word "pistis" which means "faith". This is not a mental only, intellectual only, head/heart knowledge acceptance of the Gospel. Faith requires action or it is dead (James 2:26). Without action faith (belief) does not really exist. If you don't really believe/have faith, then you don't receive salvation.
So, if you don't like what these verses say (John 1:12; 3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:40,47; 11:25,26; Acts 10:43; 13:39; 16:31; Romans 1:16; 4:5; 10:4; 1 Corinthians 1:21; 1 John 5:13 etc..) just "add" to them in order to make them say what you wish in order to accommodate your biased church doctrine? You turn these complete statements into incomplete statements and "add" to them. That is flawed hermeneutics.
Dan, look at what the plaque that was placed over Jesus' head on the cross said according to Mark 15:26. It says that the plaques said:
"THE KING OF THE JEWS". Nothing more, just "THE KING OF THE JEWS."
Is that the complete truth? For the purposes of this writer and the audience he was speaking to, yes, that was all that needed to be said. But it is not the complete story as we know from John 19:19 which says that the plaque said:
"JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS." and it was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin.
Now, is it "adding to Scripture" to include Jesus' name when we speak of what the plaque said if we are only referencing Mark's account? NO! Because we have other Scriptures that fill in gaps that Mark leaves.

The same is true of the list of verses you gave above. Those passages only mention faith, but they do not tell us what form that faith must take. Passages like Acts 2:38, Rom 10:9-10, Acts 3:19, and others tell us what form faith must take in order to bring us the salvation that God offers.
I already explained to you that repentance "precedes" saving belief/faith in Christ (two sides to the same coin) and does not need to be mentioned in those verses above because from other Scriptures we can see that it's already implied or assumed. (Acts 11:17,18; 20:21)
This is exactly what I am saying above, and it applies also to confession of Jesus as Lord, and baptism in water in order to receive forgiveness of sin.
Also, confessing with our mouth that Jesus is Lord and believing in our heart that God raised Him from the dead are not two separate steps to salvation but are chronologically together (Romans 10:8-10) so it does not need to be mentioned either.
You keep focusing on this, and I have already agreed that they come chronologically together, but must come before salvation is received.
It's already implied or assumed. Water baptism "follows" salvation through believing in Him. (Acts 10:43-47)
This is where you are wrong. Water baptism does not "follow" salvation, any more than you can be saved while still in your sin. Baptism in water is done "in order that you may receive forgiveness of your sins". It is not done "because you have already received forgiveness of your sins".
The Bible states that we are saved the moment that we believe in Christ for salvation/believe the gospel. (John 3:18; Acts 16:31; Romans 1:16 etc..)
Here is where your misinterpretation of what "pistis" means comes into play. We are not saved the moment we give intellectual assent to the truth of the Gospel. We are saved when we exhibit faith in Jesus through repentance (Acts 3:19), confess Jesus as Lord (Rom 10:9-10), and are baptized into Christ (Acts 2:38, 1 Pet 3:21, Gal 3:26-27). This is when we are saved, adopted as children of God, and made pure and holy (Eph 5:26-27)
but according to your erroneous 4-step plan of salvation, the moment one believes (only step 1) but are still lost and then they repent after that (step 2) but are still lost and they confess after that (step 3) but are still lost then they are water baptized after that (step 4) and are finally saved which is not in harmony with numerous passages of Scripture. (John 1:12; 3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:40,47; 11:25,26; Acts 10:43; 13:39; 15:7-9;16:31; Romans 1:16; 3:24-28; 4:5-6; 5:1; 10:4; 1 Corinthians 1:21; Galatians 2:16; 3:6-14, 26; Ephesians 2:8,9; Philippians 3:9; 2 Timothy 3:15; Hebrews 10:39; 1 John 5:13 etc..) which make it clear that man is saved through belief/faith "apart from additions or modifications."
Again, that is a wrong interpretation of those verses. Faith without action is dead. There is no faith without action (James 2:20, 22, 24, 26). Action are the soul that gives life to faith (the body). If there is no soul, the body is dead. If there is no action, faith is dead. The dead cannot bring life.
Yes, you do, and you even switched the order in post #342.
Ahh, I see what you are getting at. There are many forms of repentance. There is repentance from sin, but there is also repentance from disbelief, repentance from a decision, repentance from following a wrong path, repentance from following a right path, etc. Even God repented of making decisions (Gen 6:6-7, Exo 32:14, etc.). The repentance that comes before belief in the Gospel is disbelief of the Gospel (which the Holy Spirit helps us do). But this is not salvation, it is merely a step in the right direction. Repentance from sin comes after belief in the Gospel.
No worries. The word of faith is in our mouth and in our heart TOGETHER. (Romans 10:8) Confession is an expression of faith and not a work for salvation.
Yes, confession is an expression of our faith THAT LEADS TO RECEIVING SALVATION. This means that the word of faith in our mouth and heart DOES NOT mean that you are saved, but it leads toward being saved.
1 Corinthians 12:3 - Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit.
This is evidence of the Spirit of God working in us even before we are saved. But it does not indicate salvation already having been received.
In Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when he uses this phrase, he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).
Again? We have already been through this!
Yes, being baptized in water is not to clean dirt from our physical bodies. It is to remove sin from our soul (give us a clean conscience), and is done by the Holy Spirit through the power of the resurrection of Jesus. But if we do not receive water baptism, then we do not receive the clean conscience, or have our sins removed by the Holy Spirit.
In regard to Romans 6:3-4, as Greek scholar AT Robertson explains - Baptism is the public proclamation of one's inward spiritual relation to Christ attained before the baptism.
And this explanation of this person shows his personal bias that colors his interpretation. The text clearly places the reception of forgiveness of sin "in baptism", not before baptism.
Before mentioning baptism in chapter 6, Paul had repeatedly emphasized that faith (not baptism) is the instrumental cause of salvation/justification. (Romans 1:16, 3:22-30; 4:4-6, 13; 5:1) That is when the old man was put to death and united in the likeness of His death, which water baptism symbolizes and pictures. Righteousness is "imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead, who was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised up because of our justification." (Romans 4:24,25)
Baptism is an action of faith. These other verses do not reverse the statement of Jesus that says that we receive salvation in baptism (Mark 16:16), and that we cannot be saved without both the Spirit and water (baptism)(John 3:5).
Since believers receive the benefits of Christ’s death and resurrection (justification) and that through faith, believers must be spiritually united to Him (delivered and raised up with Him). If baptism is taken as the instrumental cause, then Paul contradicts what he had established before, namely that justification is by faith, not baptism. *Hermeneutics.
As I just stated, and Scripture does also, repeatedly, baptism is an act of faith. Baptism fulfills all these passages that state "justification by faith". As James 2:24 states, "You see that a person is justified by works and NOT by faith alone."
Paul clearly teaches that what is signified in baptism (buried and raised with Christ) actually occurs "through faith." Christians are "buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead" (Colossians 2:12). Justification on account of union in Christ's death, burial and resurrection is brought about "through faith" - and is properly symbolized by dipping the new believer in and out of the water.
Justification occurs DURING being dipped in and out of water (baptism). This is when we put on Christ (Gal 3:26-27). This is when we are made pure and spotless (Eph 5:2-26-27). This is when we have our sins washed away (Acts 22-26). This is when we receive salvation.
Galatians 3:26 - For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus (Period.) Not through faith and water baptism.
What does the next verse say? "For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ." You are all children of God through faith because you who were baptized INTO Him, have been clothed with Him. If you haven't been baptized into Him, then you haven't been clothed with Him, and your sins haven't been washed away.
Also read John 1:12 - But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name. *Received Him, given the right to become children of God, through believing in His name, not through water baptism.
Those who believe in Him "have the right to become". It does not say that they ALREADY ARE, but that they CAN BECOME.
Galatians 3:27 - For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on/clothed yourself with Christ. The Greek word for "put on" is "enduo" and means to enclose oneself in, as when one "puts on" clothes or armor or some other item. Involved in this is the idea of "imitation" and "identification." Just as 1 Corinthians 10:2 says that all (the Israelites) were "baptized into Moses" in the cloud and in the sea, but this does not mean that the Israelites were literally water baptized into the body of Moses.
And if you have not been clothed with Christ, then you are not in Christ. You are not His and you have not been born again. The Israelites were not baptized in water into Moses. They were baptized in the pillar of cloud and fire, and in the Red Sea. Different baptism, but same concept.
So how does one "put on" Christ in baptism? Is it because one becomes a "child of God" through water baptism? NO. Is Paul saying that we become children of God by water baptism as much as children of God by faith in Christ? NO.
Yes, that is exactly what he is saying.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
363
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"Let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light...put on the Lord Jesus Christ,
No, in order to put on the Armor of God, one must already be clothed with Christ. The Armor of God is something we put on after we are saved. The armor of God is:
The Belt of truth
The Breastplate of righteousness
The Shoes of preparation in the Gospel (training and learning)
The Shield of faith
The Helmet of the salvation we have received
The Sword of the Spirit (Scripture)
These are put on AFTER we have been saved. This is what it means to grow in the Spirit, to grow in our faith. But we do not even qualify to put on any of these until we have already been saved.
"Put off," wrote Paul, "the old man," and "put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness" (Ephesians 4:22,24); And, "put on the whole armor of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil." (Ephesians 6:11)
Satan is constantly trying to pull those of us who are in Christ back into the world. So we must daily put our armor back on, and daily choose to live in Chirst. This is not a one time thing, but a daily decision to get back into the fight on God's side. We must daily put off the old worldly man, and daily put on the new man of God.
The allusion is to putting off old clothes and putting on new ones, to enclosing oneself in armor, etc. When a soldier puts on armor he is imitating his superiors and trainers, is revealing himself to be a soldier. One does not put on a uniform in order to become a soldier. Simply putting on a soldier's uniform does not make one become a soldier. Then once one is made a soldier one is then able to put on and wear the uniform that distinguishes or marks them as a soldier.
Precisely. You must be a child of God (be "in Chirst") before you are allowed to wear the armor of the King, and putting on the armor of the King does not make you a soldier of the King. But when you are a soldier of the King, you have the right to put on His armor, and be fitted out to fight for the King.
So too with being water baptized, the Christian puts on robes for which they have previously been qualified to wear. The putting on of Christ is not what makes one become a Christian, but one which becomes a token of it, as in Romans 13:14. If one sets out to put on the clothes of a Christian, in water baptism, without first becoming a Christian (child of God through faith), then one becomes an imposter, and is declaring, in baptism, to be what they are not.
Dan, it is in baptism that we become a true soldier of the King. Remember in "the Three Musketeers" how through the whole movie, D'Artagnan fought for the king, and he did everything he could do to save the kingdom, but it wasn't until the very end of the movie when the king laid a sword on his sholder and made him a knight in the Musketeers. He was not a Musketeer until the ceremony. That is what baptism is for us. It is the ceremony that places us into Christ, and during which the Holy Spirit removes our sins and makes us pure and holy.
So, to automatically read "baptism" into John 3:5 simply because it mentions "water" is unwarranted.
No, it is neither automatic nor is it unwarranted. What does Scripture say is the point at which we are saved (thus born again)? Baptism (1 Pet 3:21) which is where our sins are removed (given a clean conscience) by the working of the Holy Spirit. And so when Jesus says that a person cannot be born again except through both water and the Spirit. It is evident He is talking about the same thing Peter (1 Pet 3:21) and Paul (Rom 6:1-7, Col 2:11-14) are talking about.
Baptism would have no meaning without Christ’s death, burial and resurrection, but Christ’s death, burial and resurrection would still have meaning, even if there were no baptism. In other words, Christ’s death, burial and resurrection is the substance and baptism is the sign/symbol/picture. Without the substance there would be no sign/symbol/picture.
This is perfectly true. And it is because of the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus that baptism has any meaning for us today. But that does not stop it from being central to our salvation. You like to make these seemingly sweeping statements that prove your claim, but they do not stop Scripture from stating clearly that it is in baptism that our salvaiton is received.
Classic misinterpretation of James 2:20-26 which culminates in salvation by works. In James 2:14, we read of one who SAYS/CLAIMS (key word) he has faith but has no works (to evidence his claim). That is not genuine faith, but a bare profession of faith. So, when James asks, "Can that faith save him?" he is saying nothing against genuine faith, but only against an empty profession of faith/dead faith. So, James does not teach that we are saved "by" works. His concern is to show the reality of the faith professed by the individual (James 2:18) and demonstrate that the faith claimed (James 2:14) by the individual is genuine. Simple!
Yes, and a person who says they "believe in Jesus" but has not yet received baptism, equally has an empty profession of a dead faith. Their faith is make complete/perfect through the action of obedience to God's command to be baptized "in order to receive" forgiveness of their sins.
 
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,061
322
60
Columbus, Ohio
✟52,129.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Just calling out to God does not save (Matt 7:21-23). If just calling on His name saved, then there would be none at Judgement who think they are saved but He never knew. Gal 4:29 substantiates this when it says that, "But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, ..". It is not in knowing God, but in Him knowing us that salvation occurs. He does not adopt us unless we are baptized into Christ (Gal 3:26-27).
It is called faith.

I called out to God for weeks. but did not have faith. The moment I called out in faith (as I finally understood) I was saved

I agree. the holy spirit baptized me into christ the moment I trusted in him.

My pastor baptized me in water a year later
Wrong again. The baptism in which we are saved requires that man do the baptizing (Matt 28:19, Mark 16:16). It must be in water (1 Pet 3:21).
Wrong

Matt 28, they were already disciples before they get baptized (Baptize THEM)

and mark 16 is questionable. and totally contradicts john 3, john 4, john 5 and john 6
What perverted translation are you reading? Acts 2:38 says, "Peter said to them, “Repent and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit." Now, there is no way, grammatically in English or in Greek, to separate "repent" and "be baptized" from their shared relationship to "for (in order to receive) the forgiveness of your sins". Both of these relate to "for the forgiveness of sins" in exactly the same way. And it is clear from Acts 3:19 that that relationship is "in order to receive", not "because you have already received".
I am reading in the greek

repent is 2nd person plural. Peter is addressing everyone, commanding them to repent

Be baptized is third person singular. Paul is only commanding a few select people to be baptized.

Gift of the holy spirit goes with the command of repent.

Remission of sin goes with the command to be baptized. hence we have the term unto or for. and must determine what it means,, on account of or in order to recieve.

since the gift of the spirit is already been given, remmision of sin had to have accored first. so by practice. for or unto means on account of.

No I can not help what the translators did.. actually the old english is a little closer but still. do your due dilligence. if it contracts istself. the scripture is not reliable


Certainly He is the author and finisher of our faith. And He is the one giving salvation. But who does He say He gives it to? Heb 5:9 says that He is the author of salvation to those who obey Him. Not just to those who have an intellectual assent to the truth of the Gospel, but those who do what He says.
Obey him is in faith.

He who believes is not condemned, he who does not believe is condemned already. (john 3)

no mention of water baptism anywhere.

also. Titus 3: Not by works of righteousness which we have done (water baptism is a work of righteousness) but by his mercy he saved us.

You want to overrule his mercy with your works. feel free
It is not those who are saved that do what He says.
It is those who do what He says that are saved.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,061
322
60
Columbus, Ohio
✟52,129.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Are you sure that everybody who wasn't submerged under water is not baptised?
I am more worried about who was submerged into christ, his death and his burial. then who is submerged in water. as to should you
God promises he will be kind and will bless those who served others kindly in this life, those who helped the poor, starving, those in prison, and the others mentioned by Jesus in Matthew 25:31-46.

I was hungry, and you gave me to eat: I was thirsty, and you gave me to drink: I was a stranger, and you took me in: Naked, and you covered me: sick, and you visited me: I was in prison, and you came to me.

Then shall the king say to them that shall be on his right hand: Come, ye blessed of my Father, possess you the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat: I was thirsty, and you gave me to drink: I was a stranger, and you took me in: Naked, and you covered me: sick, and you visited me: I was in prison, and you came to me. (Matthew 25:34-36 DRB)

What shall it profit, my brethren, if a man say he hath faith, but hath not works? Shall faith be able to save him? And if a brother or sister be naked and want daily food: And one of you say to them: Go in peace, be ye warmed and filled; yet give them not those things that are necessary for the body, what shall it profit? So faith also, if it have not works, is dead in itself. But some man will say: Thou hast faith, and I have works. Shew me thy faith without works; and I will shew thee, by works, my faith. Thou believest that there is one God. Thou dost well: the devils also believe and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? Was not Abraham our father justified by works, offering up Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou that faith did cooperate with his works and by works faith was made perfect? And the scripture was fulfilled, saying: Abraham believed God, and it was reputed to him to justice, and he was called the friend of God. Do you see that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only? And in like manner also Rahab the harlot, was not she justified by works, receiving the messengers and sending them out another way? For even as the body without the spirit is dead: so also faith without works is dead. (James 2:14-26 DRB)


For when we are in union with Christ Jesus, neither circumcision nor the lack of it makes any difference at all; what matters is faith that works through love. (Galatians 5:6 GNB)
Those who have true saving faith will work.

those who do not. well.. kind of hard to do what you asked when you do not have faith.

even demons believe. but they saw God unlike anyone else. and walked away
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0