• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Islam Do Not Bash Muslims

Status
Not open for further replies.

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,536
4,448
Davao City
Visit site
✟304,983.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Note terrorist groups of all ideologies is irrelevant in this argument which is specifically applicable to Islamic terrorism. Your 1% is ridiculous. Show me the reference and link again. Note it is reported; Your 160,000 is a ridiculous number.
160,000 is being generous, there's probably less than that. Here is one of the posts where I gave the link to the source.


Why would I as a Christian go into a Muslim community and condemn the religion of the people that live there? How would that be showing love to my Muslim neighbor? What good would come from taking such an approach? Why would I intentionally want to damage my person witness to Christ in doing such a thing?

In another thread you told me I should teach Muslims here that they can't be friends with non-Muslims by showing them verses in the Qur'an out of context. Why would I teach something or behave in a way that would would create discord and division? Why would I as a Christian teach Muslims an extremist ideology?

Muslims don't interpret the Islamic texts like you do and neither do I as a Christian missionary. If I were to go into a Muslim community and start teaching counter to what they have been been taught by their religious leaders and what they believe, I would come across as just some ignorant fool.

I already showed where Bill Warner's "research" is garbage.


If you had some research of your own to share, you would have done so before before now.

What would give you the idea that I agree with such laws? I have never even suggested such a thing. In fact, I spoke out these types of harsh punishments in another thread.
countries like Brunei that impose the death penalty for homosexuals need more attention brought to them and there should be a global effort to push them to change their barbaric laws.
You are confusing political governments usually under Salafist/Wahhabist rule whose leaders base their laws on local interpretations of the Qur'an and haddiths. These rules and laws vary from culture to culture and often contradict what Islam teaches.

It's not that people in the regions where terrorism thrives support these groups, much of it has to do with fear and intimidation used against the population and in other cases theses groups will pay off community leaders or fund projects in order to keep the people from turning against them. The situation in these regions is much more complex than just people supporting them because they approve of what they are doing.

So what?
There are good and bad people in every good but they has nothing to do with Christianity and Buddhism per se.
It just goes to show you once again that what you claim is unique to Islam exists in other ideologies. You are not using a fair measure of judgement when it comes to Islam.

Once again, this has no support. It's just your opinion based entirely on speculation.

JosephZ,
I suggest you listen to this interview where this very learned Iman speaks the truth of Islam very objectively.
Otherwise show me where he is wrong in his view of Islam?
Mohammad Tawhidi is a fraud.

"I travelled to Iran, to the holy city of Qom, in 2007, and I engaged in my Islamic studies from there. I received my bachelor's degree and my master's degree in Islamic theology from the Al-Mustafa University." - Mohammad Tawhidi, May 25, 2017

"In spite of given warnings and notifications, the above-named person did not take heed of them each time and had not satisfactory academic record in his courses … he was placed on probation and [dropped] out on March 27, 2012 … the aforesaid person has no educational degree (or any given score) in his profile … Al-Mustafa University does not recommend Mohammad Touhidi for lecturing in any way. Accordingly, he has no competency to do religious activities or to preach sermons." -- Al-Mustafa International University

The Australian National Imams Council, which represents Imams across Australia, has said they do not recognise Tawhidi as an Imam, Sheikh or Muslim leader. His claims of being threatened by Muslims for his opinions have not been backed up by police.

The problem with Imam Tawhidi, the media's favourite Muslim
Welcome to the Weird World of Australia's 'Fake Sheikh', Mohammad Tawhidi
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Yytz6

Muslim
Jun 26, 2019
346
38
Versailles
✟37,158.00
Country
France
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Private
There's no such thing as wahabbism. It's all just propaganda. Muslims arguing with Muslims and the non-Muslims catching up thinking one of the arguing parties must be guilty of terrorism problem and the other innocent. So they made up this thing called wahabbism which usually is being thrown about without any clear definition as to what it means or often even a clear target as to who is this "wahabbi" we are supposed to be so concerned over.
 
Upvote 0

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,536
4,448
Davao City
Visit site
✟304,983.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I'm aware that many Muslims reject the terms Wahhabism and wahhabists. I guess there could be better terms such as Salafi fundamentalism or purism that could be used to describe these sects, but Wahhabism is pretty much an accepted term globally among Muslims and non-Muslims alike and has been for quite some time. I know it goes at least back at least to the 1970's as this is a term that was used in the Islamic Studies courses I was taking in the mid-80's and some of the texts books being used were published in the 70's. So even at that time when Islamic terrorism was quite rare relatively speaking, the term Wahhabism was already being used.

However the way, JosephZ, used the term is very rhetorical, cheap tactic and intellectually immature by cornering all evil and violent acts by Muslims as attributable to Wahabbism only.
Do you believe the religion of Islam teaches the following? Yes or no?

• Denounce Muslims who do not interpret the Qur’an literally.
• Muslims to hate Christians, Jews, polytheists and other unbelievers.
Christians are considered infidels who must be fought unless they have a protection contract with Muslims
• Jews and the Christian are enemies of the Muslim believers and the clash between the two realms continues until the Day of Resurrection.
• The spread of Islam through jihad is a religious obligation.
• The struggle between Muslims and Jews will continue until the hour of judgment and that Muslims will triumph because they are right and he who is right is always victorious.
• Whoever obeys the Prophet and accepts the oneness of God cannot be loyal to those who oppose God and His Prophet, even if they are his closest relatives.
• It is forbidden for a Muslim to be a loyal friend to someone who does not believe in God and His Prophet, or someone who fights the religion of Islam.
• A Muslim, even if he lives far away, is your brother in religion. Someone who opposes God, even if he is your brother by family tie, is your enemy.


If you answered yes, then you are talking about the teachings of the sect commonly referred to as Wahhabism, not the religion of Islam that greater than 90% of the world's Muslims follow.
 
Upvote 0

Joyousperson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 1, 2019
619
102
49
Beijing
✟70,743.00
Country
China
Gender
Male
Faith
Freethinker
Marital Status
Married
Islam is represented by the 6236 verses in the Quran which is directly from Allah re Quran 5:3.

Other than 1 above, all the above are in alignment with the verses in the Quran. Therefore they are Islamic. The point that Abdul Wahab's teaching happen to agree with the above is accidental.

There is no mention in the Quran that the verses must be taken literally.

Allah pointed out the Quran was presented to be understood easily.

44:58. And We have made (this Scripture) easy in thy language only that they [Muslims] may heed.​

In this case, the reading of the Quran is more than merely literal.
 
Upvote 0

Joy

John 3:16
Site Supporter
May 21, 2004
45,184
3,375
West Midlands
✟1,435,067.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
MOD HAT ON

After Staff Review
This Thread is
Permanently Closed

RV: Debate Other Religions & Faiths Statement of Purpose

The Debate Other Religions & Faiths forum is for our Christian members (as defined by the CF Statement of Faith) to debate (challenge) the beliefs of other non-Christian religions & faiths, and for members of other non-Christian religions and faiths to defend their religious beliefs. Only orthodox (Trinitarian) Christians and the members of the specific religion or faith being challenged may participate in the thread.

MOD HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.