Do "evolutionary scientists" (for lack of a better term) silence or censure critics of evolutionary theory? If so, how? And, why does this not happen in other fields of study (or does it)?
Do "evolutionary scientists" (for lack of a better term) silence or censure critics of evolutionary theory?
If so, how?
And, why does this not happen in other fields of study (or does it)?
If a paper fails peer review, does that not tell you something.
I mean, if you didn't make the cut for the basketball team do you say "I wasn't up to the standard", or "They are out to get me"?
Originally posted by Athlon4all
[q]If so, how?[/q]Sadly, because Satan snares those who are convinced. Satan is involved especially in Evolution "scientists," much more in other areas, because those other areas are closer to true science (observable, repeatable facts).
Originally posted by Late_Cretaceous
Do "evolutionary scientists" (for lack of a better term) silence or censure critics of evolutionary theory? If so, how? And, why does this not happen in other fields of study (or does it)?
Originally posted by Athlon4all
[q]If so, how?[/q]Sadly, because Satan snares those who are convinced. Satan is involved especially in Evolution "scientists," much more in other areas, because those other areas are closer to true science (observable, repeatable facts).
No, they just ignore or scoff at anything that does not support their own hypotheses or theories. They don't actively censure, they just mock at what they don't themselves believe. If they can't effectively mock something, they just ignore it. Very childish really, but effective. They just say something isn't worth considering and it goes away (in their own minds).
Quite the contrary. True science never contradicts the Bible. Your "science" is the science that I Timothy 6:20 speaks of "O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane <I>and</I> vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: "I guess just to be safe, we should reject all of science (and most of history).
Originally posted by lambslove
No, they just ignore or scoff at anything that does not support their own hypotheses or theories. They don't actively censure, they just mock at what they don't themselves believe. If they can't effectively mock something, they just ignore it. Very childish really, but effective. They just say something isn't worth considering and it goes away (in their own minds).
Originally posted by Jerry Smith
This is a convenient belief to hold if you are an evolution denier. Is it true?
I don't think it is. Can you give me any good reason to believe you?
Satan ultimately is responsible for all the ungodliness in this world. He's the one who said "I Will..." and tempted Adam and Eve in the garden.
Originally posted by lambslove
I am a scientist and see it happen almost daily.
Can you give one example where peer reviewed data has been submitted and ignored or mocked?
Any Christian who is anti-scientific should nto be towards true science, which as I said in the above post, never contradicts God's Word. What true Christians should be is anti towards your science, the science that is not based on fact but belief, and the science that elevates sceince above the LORD Jesus.Is that why some Christians are anti-science?
And anyone who rejects God's Word (wether Creation or Christ) is being decieved by Satan and drawn away by selfish desires. Satan has a hold over anyone who rejects the truth.Apparently, Satan has hold of one of these two groups of Christians.
This is true, and thats why you see how degraded the Church is today. But, there still is a believing remnant, that will stand, because we are founded on the Eternal, Living Word of God, Jesus Christ.Is it true that a house divided against itself cannot stand?