Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
actually not. here is the rare pumapard (a mix between a puma and a leopard):Same genus though, right?
You have not shown anything but beliefs. Don't blame me.And you haven't shown your evidence to anyone here. I have, you are just incapable of recognising it.
(i) You still haven't been able to convince anyone that you have the slightest clue about how to distinguish what is real from what isn't real .. (so much for your 'reasons');
(ii) 'Origin science stories' is your term. I don't have a clue as to what you mean by that term .. Do you?
(iii) I don't believe (or have 'faith' in) anything about what science has to say because I don't have to. Even if I did, it would make zero difference to what science has to say.
Since the flatworm is considered by science to be one of the oldest living relatives to man, I guess just watch how they go at it?How did man's ancestors reproduce?
no. i think that there are much more non-neutral differences between human and chimp then there is between a tiger and a house cat.What you've actually written here in weasel words is:
"There is a difference between neutral mutations and non neutral. Some of the differences among chimp and human aren't neutral when some of the differences between house cat and tiger also aren't neutral."
Alternatively it could be:
"There is a difference between neutral mutations and non neutral. Almost all of the differences among chimp and human are neutral when almost all of the differences between house cat and tiger are also neutral."
So your argument appears to be that these are different cases because they are the same![]()
So a puma and a panthera.actually not. here is the rare pumapard (a mix between a puma and a leopard):
I'd say it's a problem with labeling.i guess that is something with their genetics.
.. a non-answer.dad said:Origin issues are dealt with by science in several fields actually.SelfSim said:(i) You still haven't been able to convince anyone that you have the slightestclue about how to distinguish what is real from what isn't real .. (so much for your 'reasons');
(ii) 'Origin science stories' is your term. I don't have a clue as to what you mean by that term .. Do you?
(iii) I don't believe (or have 'faith' in) anything about what science has to say because I don't have to. Even if I did, it would make zero difference to what science has to say.
Incorrect .. Fail!dad said:You seem to think that distinguishing reality depends on first rejecting the truth.
.. (stating the obvious - everyone is welcome to hold such notions. Your 'point' is moot in the extreme).dad said:Sorry, you are welcome to your religion and delusions.
no. i think that there are much more non-neutral differences between human and chimp then there is between a tiger and a house cat.
Obviously no human is 100% reliable
You have not shown anything but beliefs. Don't blame me.
Remember in this and other threads you are welcome to show your beliefs are supposed to be more than just beliefs. Whining and moaning really doesn't do anyone any good.
Honesty would probably be the best tact. We cannot be expected to believe that you are unaware of the various branches of science that claim to tell us where life came from and the universe and man..etc... a non-answer.
.. Fail!
Incorrect .. Fail!
You have no test, I do. Jesus is the truth as well as the creator the bible says. Anything that opposes this is a lie.There is no objective test for: 'Truth exists' .. one way, or the other. The notion is therefore a belief.
End of story .. move on.
.. (stating the obvious - everyone is welcome to hold such notions. Your 'point' is moot in the extreme).
Not sure ow anyone would think the truth in the bible is hard to distinguish from the lies of demon science. They look nothing alike.Of more importance however, is that I actually make the effort to distinguish religions and delusions ... whereas you continually demonstrate your incapacity for doing that.
No problem, kid yourself, and whatever lurker may believe you all you like.Have done, you have demonstrated that you can't understand it.