You have a really huge problem understanding contexts. You simply see similar words in various places in the Bible and just put them together, thinking you proved something. Bible is words, Jesus is "the Word", therefore Bible is Jesus, therefore Bible is God. Oh mine.
That His word is true and that Jesus fulfilled Scripture and was the living word of God is basic Christianity actually.
This is what you do. You ignore the heart of the Bible and concentrate on its human part, just for your own good feeling of a "conflict with the evil science". Do you really thing that the goal of Christianity is to push forward the existence of the firmanent or precise Jewish genealogies? No.
I guess the angel reminding folks in Revelation that He created all things and all the other holy men of God in the bible who affirm and refer to it are ignoring the heart of the bible eh? Good luck with that.
Yes. And again, Bible is neither God nor dictated by God. Its written by humans, from their viewpoint and in their own words (except of some parts like prophecies). Your view of inspiration is not orthodox and has been rejected by the majority of the church for millenia. Even Augustin said we should not bend reality to accomodate it to Scriptures, but we should try to understand Scriptures according to reality.
The majority of the church system does not overrule God and Scripture, sorry that is news to you.
A child is not an imbecile. Ancient people were not imbeciles just because they were not scientifically as developed as we are. You are just trying to use as many wrong things from their books as possible and ignore as many good things as possible.
God spoke through them so what they said was from above...not from below like so called science. I also suspect that the ancients were at least as smart as modern man.
A child: God made me.
A scientist: Your parents made you.
Both are right, in different meanings.
A child: God created the world and Adam and Eve.
A Scientist: You came from pond slime and the world from a cosmic series of flukes.
A Nominal bible believer: I agree with the scientist no matter what.
For example the narrative that we are from dust means we are mortal, fragile.
No more than a river really means a train, or a tree really means the milky way. We are mortal and fragile in this sinful state, that is true, but that in no way takes away from the reality of the first man and woman.
But you ignore this message and take it all wrong, trying to prove that we are scientifically made of a literal dust.
I try not to overrule and correct God and tell Him how He reeeaaallllly done it.
You think you are doing something useful, but you are actually throwing away the message.
Whatever message opposes Scripture, let it be thrown away, stomped on, burned to ashes, and scattered to the winds.