Do creationists critically examine their own ideas (re: creationism)?

[Tone]

Alcoholics don't write 12 step programs to get sober

They're already sober so they write it?

 

[OldWiseGuy]

They're already sober so they write it?

Yes.

 

[pitabread]

Loose bricks=flaws in the belief.

Then I'll take this as yet another "no" in regards to the OP.

 

[Kylie]

Read the bible, then decide for yourself.

I have read the Bible. Many atheists have. It is not as convincing as you think it is.

 

[AV1611VET]

It is not as convincing as you think it is.

That's what they told Bob Ebeling about the Challenger.

 

[Kylie]

That's what they told Bob Ebeling about the Challenger.

Of course, when it came down to it, the evidence from the real world proved him right, didn't it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Of course, when it came down to it, the evidence from the real world proved him right, didn't it?

It proved the panel wrong.

 

[pitabread]

That's what they told Bob Ebeling about the Challenger.

I would love to know how your mind works in thinking there is a relevant connection between Bible disbelief and the Challenger disaster...

 

[Kylie]

It proved the panel wrong.

Once again, you miss the point.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Then I'll take this as yet another "no" in regards to the OP.

No loose bricks in my research.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

I have read the Bible. Many atheists have. It is not as convincing as you think it is.

Wait a few years, read it again...different bible.

 

[Kylie]

Wait a few years, read it again...different bible.

Are you kidding?

That's literally the worst pro-Bible argument I've ever heard.

 

[pitabread]

No loose bricks in my research.

How would you know? You claimed you weren't looking for them in the first place.

If you really wanted to critically examine an idea, the best way to start is asking the question: what if my idea is wrong?

 

[Tone]

How would you know? You claimed you weren't looking for them in the first place.

If you really wanted to critically examine an idea, the best way to start is asking the question: what if my idea is wrong?

Maybe...no bricks...

 

[pitabread]

Maybe...no bricks...

I think you're taking the analogy to a place OldWiseGuy wasn't intending.

 

[Tone]

I think you're taking the analogy to a place OldWiseGuy wasn't intending.

Maybe not. No bricks, because he was speaking of holistic belief, not the analytics of science.

*Science deconstructs...

 

[OldWiseGuy]

How would you know? You claimed you weren't looking for them in the first place.

If you really wanted to critically examine an idea, the best way to start is asking the question: what if my idea is wrong?

Every idea?

 

[pitabread]

Every idea?

An idea. Whichever idea you want to examine.

 

[Kylie]

If you really wanted to critically examine an idea, the best way to start is asking the question: what if my idea is wrong?

Quoted for truth.

 

[Steve Petersen]

If the moon is a light, what causes the light to go out during a lunar eclipse?