Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why?Try reading it some time and losing your pride and stubbornness and submitting yourself to the truth of Scripture and reality.
LOLYes, they were.
Why?
So I can be like you and not have an answer when a KJVO asks me why "heaven" is singular seven times in Genesis 1, and not plural once?
No, thanks.
Sorry ... but speaking in tongues isn't my thing.Go ask an Israelite about the word. You'll get the same info I just gave you.
LOL
Everyone's out of step but our No True Scotsman here ... right?
Actually, Bub, that Hebrew word is found 395 times in the OT, and 130 times it is plural, as in Genesis 2:1. In the KJV.FYI, Scot, the word "heaven" is found 200 times between Genesis 1:1 and Psalm 103:11; while "heavens" isn't found that many times in both the Old and New Testaments put together.
Care to explain that?
Sorry ... but speaking in tongues isn't my thing.
I'll take good old English any day.[VERSE=1 Corinthians 14:19,KJV]Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.[/VERSE]
You just made a technical mistake, Scot.You are suggesting that the King James TRANSLATORS "corrected" what was originally INSPIRED directly from God to the ORIGINAL writers. Do you know how idiotic that sounds?
Oh, they suddenly got the word right in Genesis 2:1, but then got it wrong again just four chapters later in Genesis 6:17?Actually, Bub, that Hebrew word is found 395 times in the OT, and 130 times it is plural, as in Genesis 2:1. In the KJV.
You just made a technical mistake, Scot.
You just referred to the autographs as the originals.
I might be idiotic, but you're wrong.
And if you're getting your junk from Wrong's Concordance, then you're getting your information from Satan's dictionary.
Adios, then, muchacho.Ain't no speaking in tongues here, moron. If you're going to respond like an idiot every time, I'll simply ignore you. You obviously aren't interested in learning, which the Bible warns against such people. You are unteachable.
Oh, they suddenly got the word right in Genesis 2:1, but then got it wrong again just four chapters later in Genesis 6:17?
Adios, then, muchacho.
Hasta luego and all that stuff.
Come back later if you need to know more about how a KJVO of the Ruckman persuasion thinks.
I did not choose to make the word "heaven" in Genesis 1:1 singular.You CHOOSE the rendering you think best fits the context or what is being said.
No, suh.
They show ain't.
Yet you're expending an inordinately large amount of time with me, a supposed moron who won't budge from his mindset.I know precisely how every KJVO thinks, which isn't very much at all.
Your entire conversation is based solely on the desire to argue rather than to actually learn. You bring up nonsense in an attempt to disprove the Bible, then you create logical fallacies as part of your arguments. Your foolishness is old and has been refuted a thousands times over. Where do you figure there was no concept of the universe or of galaxies when Genesis was written? When God spoke the sun, moon, and stars into existence, He spoke the entire universe into existence. If you want Him to detail everything precisely and to speak on everything, you'd have one massive book on your hand that you wouldn't be able to carry around. And assuming the people at that time had no concept of any of that is a false assessment. If you study EVERYTHING pertaining to history, you will see without fail that people in the past were FAR more intelligent than we are today. Being technologically superior DOES NOT equal "smarter." Just look at the amount of information that we've forgotten. Look at the fact that we cannot figure out how they built ANYTHING, let along buildings that are only a couple hundred centuries old. The biggest genius engineers we have today cannot figure out how they were about to do what they did. The Incas built walls that do not move in an earthquake, and are so precise they look like they were cut by lasers that you cannot fit a piece of paper between them. There is a mosque (or some temple) with two pillars inside, unjoined, not on any platform, that shift vibrations to each other. You can find all sorts of videos and documentaries talking about these amazing constructions of history, and yet NOBODY today knows how they were able to achieve it. Fact is, we are dumber today than any time throughout history. Even the dark ages. When you have a majority of idiots holding to a post-modern philosophy that says things are what I want them to be rather than what they are, I'd be surprised if society could be and dumber. Words have meanings and are NOT open to interpretation; people CAN BE right or wrong and there is NOTHING wrong with telling them they are wrong and correcting them; FACTS do not allow for personal opinions and a person's opinion MUST submit to FACT; and there ARE absolutes. Stating there are no absolutes is making an absolute statement, which negates the entire argument, thus proving absolutes.
Furthermore, something being created first does not make it centric in the least. Earth isn't the center of our solar system, it isn't the center of our galaxy, and it isn't the center of the universe. Never was, despite some people's insistence thereof during the past. The modern view of the universe is flawed. What's their current theory today? What's it going to be tomorrow? How many times has "science's" view of the universe changed over the centuries, and yet it STILL ignores the laws of our universe and simple mathematics, as well as the evidence around us, that continue to support the Bible's words?
No, suh.
They show ain't.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?