• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do atheists have any evidence to support their beliefs?

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
No. You asked what facts are there outside the scientific method and I gave you a whole field of knowledge.

Very well.

Try for facts about our universe then. Can you show me one demonstrably true fact about our universe that does not come from the scientific method.
 
Upvote 0

Holoman

Credo
Jun 29, 2015
417
149
UK
✟33,043.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Very well.

Try for facts about our universe then. Can you show me one demonstrably true fact about our universe that does not come from the scientific method.

Depends what you mean by demonstrably. There are lots of metaphysical facts that cannot be proved scientifically, such as the fact the external world exists at all and is not a construct of my mind.

And like I said, plenty of mathematical truths are demonstrable. You can draw a right-angled triangle and measure the sides to confirm pythagorus's theorem
 
Upvote 0

GrowingSmaller

Muslm Humanist
Apr 18, 2010
7,424
346
✟56,999.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Is that true? Just for you or everyone?
You get my point, relative truth is self defeating.
Relative in the sense that it depends on presuppositions, like an external reality. I think "sensory experience" is itself a translation - back in the day they didn't have the same model of the senses we have nowadays, so even something so basic as "sense data" is based in a model with its presuppositions.

How is relativism self defeating?
 
Upvote 0

GrowingSmaller

Muslm Humanist
Apr 18, 2010
7,424
346
✟56,999.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
(Yesterday night I attended a two and a half hours service and sermon at a charismatic church. Well, I thoroughly regret it, though.)
But what does any of this have to do with "justifying beliefs" (the topic of this thread)?
Not sure to be honest. Sometimes I just post and hope.

I was thinking of the pragmatic idea of asking what difference a belief would make.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_maxim
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,728
15,191
Seattle
✟1,182,203.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Very well.

Try for facts about our universe then. Can you show me one demonstrably true fact about our universe that does not come from the scientific method.

A squared + B Squared = C squared. I think you have this one backwards. Facts are not scientific, science uses facts. Facts exist all on their own.
 
Reactions: Holoman
Upvote 0

Abraxos

Christ is King
Jan 12, 2016
1,128
617
124
New Zealand
✟79,019.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Depends what you mean by demonstrably. There are lots of metaphysical facts that cannot be proved scientifically, such as the fact the external world exists at all and is not a construct of my mind.

I've never met another solipsist.

But I have to ask - how is it a fact that the external world exists and isn't a product of your mind? How have you proven this to be a fact?

And like I said, plenty of mathematical truths are demonstrable. You can draw a right-angled triangle and measure the sides to confirm pythagorus's theorem

But mathematics is an abstract concept. Numbers and shapes don't actually exist in reality. We only have representations of them.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
A squared + B Squared = C squared. I think you have this one backwards. Facts are not scientific, science uses facts. Facts exist all on their own.

Science is a tool used to discover facts about our universe. It was science that discovered the fact about how our sun glows, for example. Science discovered the facts about how old dinosaur fossils are.

Where do facts come from if not from scientific investigation? And how do we determine that they are facts if not for science?
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,728
15,191
Seattle
✟1,182,203.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
You tell me. What's to expand on?


No proof or evidence for atheism.

Atheism is not a claim therefore it requires no evidence.

I require no evidence to state that I do not find your claims convincing. I am the worlds foremost expert on what I think.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,728
15,191
Seattle
✟1,182,203.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married

Science is the tool of exploration, agreed. But it is not the only viable tool. It is simply the most accurate one.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
No proof or evidence for atheism.

Atheism isn't a belief. There can't be a proof of atheism that isn't simply a refutation of theistic apologetic arguments. I'm not sure how I would provide proof of the non-existence of fire-breathing dragons either.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Reactions: Gene2memE
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Math, Logic, and religion have all served that purpose to some extent.

Math and logic are abstract concepts that do not describe things that exist in reality.

And I don't think that religion has ever provided a reliable way to learn about our universe.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Math, Logic, and religion have all served that purpose to some extent.
WINNER! YES! TRUE that men use math, logic, (even science) and religion to learn about the world and universe, (they think so anyway, though usually .... )

but, sadly, "always learning but never coming to knowledge of the truth" is also a fact....

Oh well.......
 
Upvote 0