Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Interesting. How does one measure "positive intention" objectively to make a research worth reading?
So, you know the answer but refuse to educate your fellow man? What a brilliant paradigm of free information you areI suggest you read the book to get that answer. How do you know any research is worthy of a read unless you read it. Or you can take my word for it if you wish.
I suggest you read the book to get that answer. How do you know any research is worthy of a read unless you read it. Or you can take my word for it if you wish.
So, you know the answer but refuse to educate your fellow man? What a brilliant paradigm of free information you are
I looked up the author... It's quite clear from a quick Google Scholar search she's pretty much a quack. You know, homeopathy, 'dangers' of modern medicine, 'secret' cancer cures, 'dangers' of vaccinations, etc etc etc...
Thiomersal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaI looked up the author... It's quite clear from a quick Google Scholar search she's pretty much a quack. You know, homeopathy, 'dangers' of modern medicine, 'secret' cancer cures, 'dangers' of vaccinations, etc etc etc...
Why not? The doses present in vaccines is lower than that found in tuna - and my tuna & cucumber sandwiches are certainly not fatal.Thiomersal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I avoid vaccination. I don't want any mercury in my body.
If you're read the book, can't you give us a summary of the requested information? If you haven't, how can you cite it?I didn't say I new the answer, nor did I refuse to give it. I said the the book was worth a read and suggested that was what's required.
Thiomersal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I avoid vaccination. I don't want any mercury in my body.
She's the author or the book. She has amasssed data from scientists who have made this area of research their lifes work. I don't think they quickly google searched anything.
Yes, they have stopped using it, except in flu vaccines. Anyway the problem is that they have put known toxic compound with possible cumulative effects in the vaccines. The question is if they really care about my life. The answer is "no". They have used the first poison that will do the job. Why spend $$$ for research unless someone complains? Do I believe the vaccines today are safer? No, I have no reason to think that they are safer.I certainly hope you don't eat fish then, as the amount of mercury in a salmon dinner far exceeds that found in vaccines... and they've even stopped using that much in vaccines, as you'd know if you read the wikipedia article that you linked.
Oh, yes. People do not catch flu if they got their shot. Wait. They do. Plenty of examples out there.The risk of having a few extra moles of mercury in your system are far surpassed by the risk of getting or carrying a dangerous disease.
Maybe so, but I can't find any data on the substances that contain Hg in sea food. Also there is difference between eating your tuna and getting intravenous shot. Most of the tuna Hg will go out unabsorbed with your feces.Why not? The doses present in vaccines is lower than that found in tuna - and my tuna & cucumber sandwiches are certainly not fatal.
Maybe so, but I can't find any data on the substances that contain Hg in sea food. Also there is difference between eating your tuna and getting intravenous shot. Most of the tuna Hg will go out unabsorbed with your feces.
Maybe so, but I can't find any data on the substances that contain Hg in sea food. Also there is difference between eating your tuna and getting intravenous shot. Most of the tuna Hg will go out unabsorbed with your feces.
Yes, they have stopped using it, except in flu vaccines. Anyway the problem is that they have put known toxic compound with possible cumulative effects in the vaccines. The question is if they really care about my life. The answer is "no". They have used the first poison that will do the job. Why spend $$$ for research unless someone complains? Do I believe the vaccines today are safer? No, I have no reason to think that they are safer.
Salmon dinner? Yuck!
Nonetheless, mercury is absorbed as part of our daily lives, and tuna sandwiches (for instance) make you absorb more mercury than is injected intravenously in the form of thimersal. Besides, do you have any evidence that the amount of thiomersal injected as part of vaccinations actually leads to mercury poisoning?Maybe so, but I can't find any data on the substances that contain Hg in sea food. Also there is difference between eating your tuna and getting intravenous shot. Most of the tuna Hg will go out unabsorbed with your feces.
I can't see that data anywhere. I've searched the web only to find out that people usually compare the content of Hg in a fish serving to the content of a vaccine. I'll be happy to see the data about the absorbed amount from the serving, if you kindly provide it, instead of just telling me.No, the amount absorbed by your body from a typical tuna dinner has more Hg than the microscopic amount that's with a small amount of vaccines.
Agreed, but this is not what I'm saying. Before we can talk about the Hg from the fish serving leaving our body we should talk about entering our body. Eating it will not necessarily mean that all of it will be absorbed in our body.I'm sorry to have to disagree, but mercury from fish takes months to leave your body... and it does so the same way mercury in your blood would. (Stool is brown partly because it contains a lot of dead blood cells.)
You're forgetting that the flu shots also costs money and it usually do not protect you at all, so it is waste of resources.The whole vaccine controversy began with an attempt to sue a drug company using a study that has since been proven to have used corrupted data and whose results further studies have failed to replicate. The only way a vaccine is going to hurt you is if you have an allergic reaction to it or if you are one of the very, very, very small percentage of people who actually gets the disease.
Where is the data of the amount absorbed?Nonetheless, mercury is absorbed as part of our daily lives, and tuna sandwiches (for instance) make you absorb more mercury than is injected intravenously in the form of thimersal. Besides, do you have any evidence that the amount of thiomersal injected as part of vaccinations actually leads to mercury poisoning?
Mercury in the EnvironmentWhere is the data of the amount absorbed?
So you never take any medication, or eat any new foodstuff, or drink any new liquids, right? Because none of it has been proven to be safe for you? I think you have quite a misunderstand of the nature of medicine and clinical trials.Thimerosal is toxic. There is no study that shows thimerosal is safe for me. And since I'm talking about me, not about the large group of people used to be test mice, I don't see how any study is relevant to me.
I'd rather you didn't peddle misinformation to vulnerable children and adults. If you don't want to get vaccinated against debilitating and potentially fatal diseases, that's your business. You cited the mercury in vaccines as the reason you don't get vaccinated, yet the evidence demonstrates that the mercury absorbed is below that absorbed by eating fish - yet I don't imagine you protest outside your local fishmongers.In other words what you are asking from me is to get flu shot with thimerosal and then show you that I've got sick. Sorry, it is not going to happen, unless you show me first it is safe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?