Originally posted by notto
Actually, I think a better question would be to AIG.
"Why do they think a quote that states that there is not enough data to make a conclusion supports their making a conclusion?"
They try to make it sound as if Joyce is saying that the data supports their conclusion but the context of the quote makes it clear that he is stating that there is not enough evidence (at that point 15 years ago) to make a solid conclusion.
Of course, a lot has changed in the last 15 years around RNA research. I think it is a bad choice that AIG STILL uses that quote to try to persuade their audience.
It would be interesting if AIG would use some newer quotes (and newer papers) from Joyce to try to continue to support their position.
Maybe you should ask them about it?
Upvote
0