- Feb 25, 2016
- 11,539
- 2,725
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
This video provides reasons why DNA is definite evidence that there is indeed a creator.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Complication isn't the reason for the conclusion. So your statement is straw man.Classic argument from ignorance: It's complicated, therefore god.
Also, those are some really ugly dna depictions...
Complication isn't the reason for the conclusion. So your statement is straw man.
Then you are misunderstanding it as well.No, he is correct.
Then you are misunderstanding it as well.
Complication isn't the reason for the conclusion. So your statement is straw man.
If there were any deficiency in the explanations provided or if there were and vagueness or obscurity I might attempt to clarify. However, since I detect none of these it's impossible for me to improve what to me is already perfectly clear. So I guess we will just simply have to agree to disagree.That was what I got from the video as well. If that is not the argument then can you paraphrase it for us please?
No, that is basically what every about God creating DNA boils down to: "It's complicated, so it must have been created."
There is nothing in DNA that supports the claim that it was created by a deity.
How can one offer a counterargument to the points of the video if you don't even know what the points of the video are?Well, you are entitled to your opinion. So I guess we simply disagree. However, please keep in mind that disagreeing without offering any counterargument to any of the points brought out in the video isn't really any rebuttal of those points. It is merely a remark.
I don't have to be personally involved in your attempted rebuttal to any of the points in the video.How can one offer a counterargument to the points of the video if you don't even know what the points of the video are?
If there were any deficiency in the explanations provided or if there were and vagueness or obscurity I might attempt to clarify. However, since I detect none of these it's impossible for me to improve what to me is already perfectly clear. So I guess we will just simply have to agree to disagree.
Please also note that my posting the video isn't an attempt at convincing atheists. My posting the videos is simply an attempt at edification of fellow Christians who will appreciate the information. Since this is a Christian website I find absolutely nothing unusual, unexpected or out context in doing so.
The counterargument has already been made, you just chose to shoot it down by claiming it a strawman, so you were actually the one involving yourself.I don't have to be personally involved in your attempted rebuttal to any of the points in the video.
So your premise is seriously flawed.
It is not restricted to Christians only because it is based on science. So you are quite welcomed to offer your opinions and attempted rebuttals.I did not ask you to improve upon it. I asked you to paraphrase it. However if you do not wish to attempt it we will indeed need to agree to disagree.
Odd then that you did not post it in the Christian only section.
The counterargument has already been made, you just chose to shoot it down by claiming it a strawman, so you were actually the one involving yourself.
It is not restricted to Christians only because it is based on science. So you are quite welcomed to offer your opinions and attempted rebuttals.
BTW
I find the whole presence of atheists on this Christian website as odd.
No, it is not restricted to Christians because it is in the small section non Christians can post in. You are aware there is a Christian only CREVO section?
A lot of us are from back when other points of view were more accepted on the website.
I am not attempting to restrict feedback to Christians as you are claiming.
Atheists are quite welcomed to express their opinions and attempt rebuttals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?