Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Rowell said:I can do nothing short of publishing a book and giving it to you people with full citation before you believe about 4 years of my research on the arguement.
Vance said:The ultimate problem with every one of those questions is that they anthropomorphize God and bring Him down to our puny level. This is ironic since it is the YEC's who say that TE's don't give God a large enough role in Creation. The truth is that they have trouble realizing that God is ultimately SO FAR beyond our comprehension that it is just silly for us to ask the "why's". He's GOD.
It is like my son, back when he was two, trying to understand my job as an estate planning attorney. No, that is even too close. More like my DOG trying to understand it.
God told us what we need to know for salvation, which are the truths contained in Genesis. We can also figure out the skeletal outline of how and when He did things through the study of His creation itself. But to think that we can fathom the infinite power and wisdom of the creator of "life, the universe and everything" is a bit hubristic.
(and no, the answer is probably not 42). :0)
But the problem is . . . well, just about everything you just said.bluejeans said:Don't let the atheists get to you! There are great resources
available to you on the internet and book stores that prove that
Evolution is just a pagan religion and it's proving that Babylon is
rising back up. Satan is getting all the atheist back in church in
his pagan religions. He's not about to let them go in the last days.
Hang in there,and keep telling them the truth no matter how they
protest. They are the angry,bitter ones. Give them something to
think about when they begin to see that the bible is for real and
everything it says is happening today. Don't listen to their excuses.
God is alive,he's real,and he's shown me the evidence that he is
who he says he is,so stay strong in your faith,amen.
yes we do actually, here is one. there are earlier ones and later ones tooRowell said:Evolution claims that each animal evolved into another from another previous animal, slowly, gradually, over millions of years. If this were true, we'd be able to look into the fossil record and see where a fish fin sloowwwwlly, gradually, evolved into a paw. In fact, we should at least see something that looks like an inbetween fin/paw. But we don't.
no, because fossilisation is rare. by your argument you should be able to find millions of passenger pigeon skeletons dotted around the US. go one, find one then.Not only do we not see one instance of it, but for darwinian evolution to be true we'd need to see billions of these things -- we ought to be able to stick each fossil one by one and make, almost, a motion picture will the subtle changes shown.
false, there are a number of organisms which are difficult to charaterise. Is cynodont a mammal or a reprile?This should occur for every evolved change. In fact, we ought to find it nearly impossible to tell where one animal begins and another ends -- it should be a growing tree of many variations leading back to one universal animal (if he still existed in the fossil record, of course, which would be highly improbable I know). Nontheless, instead we see clearly defined, individual species of animals that we can actually categorize because of their distinctness, appearing abruptly and apparently out of no where.
and we have. see the evidence for the rebuttal of your baseless claim about tetrapod evolution.Darwin himself to say "The proof of evolution lies in the fossil record," but that he had no proof -- he believed the fossil record was incomplete, and hoped that in the future we'd discover examples of evolution.
false, there are a significant number of neanderthal fossils which show distinct morphological differences to humans.I could get into each "caveman" and explain him, but there's something like 8 of those guys ... and I'm too lazy to cover them all. You have Neathderthal man who they found hunched over and with tools, so they said "He must be an ape man!". Closer examination of them shown that they were racked with severe arthritist that made them hunch over -- human, but the people were very sick, possibly due to inbreeding perhaps.
that was a hoax played on scientists and exposed by scientists.Piltdown man was faked by filing a chimpanzee and human skull together and making a cast of it -- it was later admitted to being one.
false, it is a single skeleton. therumours you have heard about the knee are misquotes made by dishonest creationists.Lucy was assembled using remnants of a chimpanzee skeleton and a human skeleton found in a different layer of soil in an different immediate location;
he was never really accept3d anyway. are you going to go into all the fossils plz rather than the usual creationist selection. I love the way that 2 of your examples are hoaxes, and so irrelevant to the discussion, and you make massive errors about the other two. well done, you lack of knowledge is shining through.Nebraska Man was completely fictional, the result of a concept artists rendition of cave men to be used in a trial to support evolution based on a single tooth -- that tooth later being found to come from a pig.
ok, so look at my signature and see the second law of thermodynamics in it's full precise form. precisely which bit of evolution disobeys that rule and how? you're the expert it seems, so spit it out.Then you got your laws of thermodynamics. The second one, aka entropy, states that the universe is basically decaying. These a laws, uncontested. We can even prove it -- by sticking a car out in the middle of a field and watching it rot away. We even know that genetic information is lost when new life is created (childbirth). So in this universal law that says, and proves, that everything is falling apart, how do we then rectify a theory that says life is improving for the better, striving for further complexity and perfection? They're conflicting doctorine -- one's been proven, one has evidence pointing against it. I'll trust Lord Kelvin, eh?
Rowell said:Okay, well I'm back from work and can finally respond fully to all the comments -- literalism isn't an unquestionable belief -- it is unquestionable that literal Christianity is Christianity. Some Christians, however, would say that a thiestic evolutionists is neither Christian nor evolutionist, and that is the point of what I was saying.
Evolution does not equal atheism. Say that foolishness again and I will bring out the big Fonts. Btw, it's against forum rules to say that stuff, so please make my day.bluejeans said:The atheist agenda blahbklahblah.
1. Vance is an evolutionistbluejeans said:Don't let the atheists get to you! There are great resources
available to you on the internet and book stores that prove that
Evolution is just a pagan religion and it's proving that Babylon is
rising back up. Satan is getting all the atheist back in church in
his pagan religions. He's not about to let them go in the last days.
Hang in there,and keep telling them the truth no matter how they
protest. They are the angry,bitter ones. Give them something to
think about when they begin to see that the bible is for real and
everything it says is happening today. Don't listen to their excuses.
God is alive,he's real,and he's shown me the evidence that he is
who he says he is,so stay strong in your faith,amen.
Ditto the above.Karl - Liberal Backslider said:1. Vance is an evolutionist
2. So am I
3. Neither of us are atheists.
4. Your entire hypothesis is thereby shown to be a load of dingos' kidneys.
h2whoa said:Ditto the above.
But the biggest religious group of evolution accepters in the West are Christians. That's what your position can't deal with.bluejeans said:I didn't say that only atheists believe in evolution. Thats crazy to accuse
me of that when I already know that evolution was invented by the
ancient pagan religions.
Mistermystery said:Evolution does not equal atheism. Say that foolishness again and I will bring out the big Fonts. Btw, it's against forum rules to say that stuff, so please make my day.
The ancient pagan religions of mid 18th century england?bluejeans said:I didn't say that only atheists believe in evolution. Thats crazy to accuse
me of that when I already know that evolution was invented by the
ancient pagan religions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?