• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Dishonoring Mary

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
52
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
Axion said:
The anti-Mary "hate" developed over the past three hundred years in the more extreme protestant denominations. Now there are some who cannot see Mary's name mentioned without trying to insult and demean her - and imagining that in doing so, they are somehow pleasing God!!!
I am always stunned how Protestant Bible-studies on "women of the Bible" usually always fail to include the Virgin Mary!!!
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Defens0rFidei said:
Right now there is some serious historical revisionism going on...people are trying to say in PRE that Calvin didnt support Mary's perpetual virginity! Amazing! I listed some references of Calvin's sermon's about the issue...but I bet it will be ignored.

Yeah, I know, we can’t read history right, we can’t read the ECF right, we can’t read scripture right, we can’t read what the reformers wrote right, we can’t read our OWN Church council and documents right… Everything is up to their subjective interpretation any anything we quote is falsely interpreted. They have turn everything into being subjective, there is no objective anything. God just wanted everything to be subjective, left up to personal interpretation.

The joke of the matter is, it is subjective and that is exactly why we have the magisteriuim, to know objectively what is true. They reject that because humans are fallible but yet they have the right way to read everything. They’re reasoning illogical at best.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

Christy4Christ

Pro-Christ
Jan 30, 2004
4,948
117
55
Hollywood, FL
✟5,762.00
Faith
Catholic
Oblio that was really deep and gave me goose bumps! The face and eyes will be hers! I love that.


Listen does anyone have info on the actual words that were used in the original language when the angel spoke to her? I have heard it said that the words that were said to her by the angel would have only been said to one who is holy. I have also heard this was lost in the translation to English. Does anyone have any info on what the words were?

Thanks for all of your responses to this thread.
 
Upvote 0

marciadietrich

Senior Veteran
Dec 5, 2002
4,385
296
62
Visit site
✟28,560.00
Faith
Catholic
FR0G said:
Can I ask what is considered by a Catholic to be dishonoring Mary? Is mere disbelief in the IC, and thus belief that Mary was a sinner, considered "anti-Mary"?

--------
"I'm smokin' the TRUTH, man!!!!!!"
Hey Frog,

It isn't dishonoring Mary to not understand all the Catholic belief.

Oh, and I love you sig line with Adrian Monk. Best show on TV. :D

Marcia
 
Upvote 0

Christy4Christ

Pro-Christ
Jan 30, 2004
4,948
117
55
Hollywood, FL
✟5,762.00
Faith
Catholic
I am starting to see some really sick groups of people out there and here is the saddest part of all. I am having trouble praying for them. :( I am just having alot of trouble feeling sorry for them or praying for their soul or any of the things I should do as a good Christian. How dare they try and say WE are from Satan? WOW it's really amazing the ignorance of people. Thanks for letting me vent. :cry:
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Axion said:
These people try to "prove" that Jesus hated and spurned His Mother, that she was just some sort of "vessel" like a glass tube through which Jesus entered the world, taking nothing of her - despite the fact that this is one of the most heinous Gnostic heresies, denying the Incarnation itself.
Yes, and they do so with Scripture. What they do not realize is not only are they dishonoring Mary, they are dishonoring the Lord! If such nonesense were true, it would mean that Jesus committed a sin, which He did not because Jesus is God.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

FR0G

~
Oct 11, 2003
644
115
58
Michigan
Visit site
✟1,396.00
Faith
Seeker
Politics
US-Democrat
marciadietrich said:
Hey Frog,

It isn't dishonoring Mary to not understand all the Catholic belief.

Oh, and I love you sig line with Adrian Monk. Best show on TV. :D

Marcia
Isn't it though? It's a show I feel comfortable letting my 8 year old daughter watch right along with me too. Those are few and far between. :)
 
Upvote 0

Axion

Senior Veteran
Feb 5, 2003
2,942
301
uk
Visit site
✟4,616.00
Faith
Catholic
FR0G said:
Protoevangelium? :scratch:

A passage in Genesis generally agreed to be prophetic of the whole New Testament. (It is sometimes called the proto-gospel.)

Genesis 3:15. "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel."

These are the words God spoke to the SERPENT. Some confuse them with the words earlier spoken to Eve, taking Eve to be the Woman mentioned here, but this is not the case.

The words "her seed" are singular, meaning ONE decendant who shall bruise the head of the serpent. This decendant is generally agreed to be Jesus.


So who is the woman?

1. Her SEED is Jesus. Jesus is her child or descendant. The singular implies only One descendant.

2. In Hebrew thinking the SEED was imparted by the Man. Yet here the Woman is the one whose Seed Jesus is. "her seed". This is very unusual, and points to the Woman referred to being the SOLE human parent - as was Mary.

3. "I will put enmity between you and the Woman, and between your seed and her seed." This is spoken to Satan. And by this we can see that the Woman referred to cannot be Eve. Was there enmity between Eve and Satan? Eve was about to be expelled from Eden for Sin. Was there enmity between the "seed", or decendants, of Eve and Satan? No. They were so evil that all but noah and his family had to be destroyed.

Mary, however, being Full of Grace, Was at enmity with Satan, we see this emphasised again in Revelation 12, where Satan is shown at enmity with the mother of Christ and with her spiritual children. So, just as the "seed" referred to is Jesus. The Woman referred to, in Genesis 3 is Mary.
 
Upvote 0

tigersnare

Angry Young Calvinist
Jul 8, 2003
1,358
23
42
Baton Rouge, LA
✟1,636.00
Faith
Calvinist
Axion said:
The words "her seed" are singular, meaning ONE decendant who shall bruise the head of the serpent. This decendant is generally agreed to be Jesus.
Following this hermeneutic, who is the serpants "seed"?

Following a different hermeneutic I've heard, is this was the start of the line of promise which we can follow all the way through the rest of the bible. aka Children of God and Children of Satan



Axion said:
3. "I will put enmity between you and the Woman, and between your seed and her seed." This is spoken to Satan. And by this we can see that the Woman referred to cannot be Eve. Was there enmity between Eve and Satan? Eve was about to be expelled from Eden for Sin. Was there enmity between the "seed", or decendants, of Eve and Satan? No. They were so evil that all but noah and his family had to be destroyed.
But surely Noah, then Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, etc etc.....aka the line the of promise.....no?
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
52
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
The seed is referred to in the singular as "he will crush your head" -- the "he" is supposed to refer to the Messiah, not the "seed" (although "seed" is a masculine word "spermatos" in the Greek [Septuagint] and in the Hebrew "zera", I think as well is masculine -- the word "zera" is the same in singular and plural forms but the singular of who would crush the head lends support that "seed" here is singular) See Gal. 3:16 to see the contrast of "seeds."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.