Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Again im telling u the the link is not proven but assumed. I can also show u pictures of humans who have skulls similar to earlier specie of humans as described in modern day evolution. The earliest ones are from apes. Maybe u are right but again maybe its actually skulls of humans and apes assumed to be earlier specie of humansPotentially, scientific theories can always turn out to be wrong. But in the case of the theory of evolution, there is much evidence which appears to confirm it, no evidence against it, and no credible alternative theory. So, we accept it as is pending new developments.
It depends on whether you are interested in the field and paying attention or not. Otherwise it's not a big deal unless the new theory has applications which affect your daily life in some way.Did it? And what will you know when some scientist comes up with a new theory in two weeks? Will you still "know" the old one?
Then name one from the past. Oh wait, you already failed at that.How would I know which one will be proven wrong? But many are every day, although it takes a while to trickle down to the common folk.
True. What I should have said was “the evidence suggests that the Dinosaurs were finished off by the Chicxulub impact to the extent of our current knowledge”.Did it? And what will you know when some scientist comes up with a new theory in two weeks? Will you still "know" the old one?
No, it is a rational conclusion supported by massive evidence. Fossil skulls are only one very small part of the evidence. They are often given because they are fairly obvious to be evidence to the untrained eye. There is far far more evidence than that.Again im telling u the the link is not proven but assumed. I can also show u pictures of humans who have skulls similar to earlier specie of humans as described in modern day evolution. The earliest ones are from apes. Maybe u are right but again maybe its actually skulls of humans and apes assumed to be earlier specie of humans
Simple question for u. Can the theory of evolution be wrong?The problem is that you appear to be the sort that rejects evidence out of hand. And that is a terribly dishonest thing to do. You keep pretending that there is no evidence for evolution when there clearly is. This means one of two things, you either do not understand the concept of evidence, or you are lying. I doubt if you are lying. That leaves us with an inability to understand what evidence is.
And by the way, your claim is incorrect. Early on I did provide you with the definition of hypothesis, since you did not understand that concept. You merely denied it. That indicates that you are apt to deny evidence as well. Which in a debate is, as I already said, very dishonest.
But if you do not want to learn what is and what is not evidence I can't make you learn. You will only continue to make yourself look rather ignorant in your future posts. You will not be able to understand what you are trying to refute so you will be like a baseball player wearing a blindfold. Swinging your bat at nothing.
History does not use direct observations of events. Looking at a supernova 500 light years away is viewing history in real time.Umm, history is exactly what we're talking about, ancient history. Are you trying to say that our experimental archaeology isn't a science?
Maybe so, but people who know quite a bit more about it than either of us say not, so I see no problem in going along with it. Perhaps you could study paleontology yourself and prove them wrong.Again im telling u the the link is not proven but assumed. I can also show u pictures of humans who have skulls similar to earlier specie of humans as described in modern day evolution. The earliest ones are from apes. Maybe u are right but again maybe its actually skulls of humans and apes assumed to be earlier specie of humans
YES!Simple question for u. Can the theory of evolution be wrong?
The evidence strongly supports that claim. The dating of deposits can be done quite accurately at times, and the impact of the asteroid left a worldwide marker. When a known event results coordinates exactly with an apparent worldwide extinction, and that event was powerful enough to affect the world, it is a pretty good sign that it was the cause.Did it? And what will you know when some scientist comes up with a new theory in two weeks? Will you still "know" the old one?
Yes, the theory of evolution can be wrong. But the theory of evolution is not evolution.Simple question for u. Can the theory of evolution be wrong?
There's guess work in all of them, that's the point. The reason I mentioned experimental archaeology is because a person can actually prove whether a skill works as supposed by, well, experiments!If experimental archeologist are not just making guesses why are biologists not making guesses?
I don't believe evolution happened, as Darwin supposed. In fact, no one does, but that's besides the point.Again, I like to ask what
Its is an explanation.
You seeing it not necessarily does not make it a fact. Like u see it as unnecessary we see it a necessity. There is no difference u see. Both are beliefs and both cannot be scientifically proven or disproven unless proven otherwise.
Nope, they are now saying it may not have had a beginning. ( Again) Even if there was an expansion, we don't know what happened prior.
The evidence is strong, and it certainly defines the beginning of everything we know about the universe... we just don't before.That the BB was the beginning for one. That's very much in question. Not fact.
So if life can adapt and change, where and what is the barrier that stops this?I don't believe evolution happened, as Darwin supposed. In fact, no one does, but that's besides the point.
I have no reason to buy that one kind of animal becomes another kind. God created and we all adapt to our environment because he planned for this to be possible.
I thought you claimed that it was facts which change?Lol, are you serious? The Earth was once believed to be the center of the universe. Are you really trying to claim scientific theories don't change?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?