Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just pointing out my 9 month old daughter is female yet is not close to "mature"
Male and female is just that, male or female, determined in the womb for humans. Dinosaurs idk but it has nothing to do with sexual maturity. Just wanted to clear that up for you. When reading the Bible you should never ad words to the writing, it changes the teachings.
Why were dinosaurs not allowed on the Ark?
Excuse me ma'am, but I think you've overlooked his point. By referring to a "male and his female", the text is clearly indicating that the animals are adult. They are paired. Pairing takes place amongst those animals that are sexually mature and ready to breed.
Genesis 8:15-17 said:Then God spoke to Noah, saying, “Go out of the ark, you and your wife and your sons and your sons’ wives with you. Bring out with you every living thing of all flesh that is with you, birds and animals and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, that they may breed abundantly on the earth, and be fruitful and multiply on the earth.”
You are correct, and give a great example evolution, as nostrils became part of the breathing apparatus for land animals, but not for modern fish. Pretty cool eh?
That would be so cool to have toes like that.
Mine look more like they've been broken
and bound up since I was 5.
This picture suggests they've been kissing.
This comment undermines your argument. Was Eve created as a baby or as a mature woman, ready for child-bearing?Considering, in Genesis especially, women were created for men, saying "his female" does not even remotely begin to say "mature female"
Please show where I misquoted scripture. My verse was Genesis 7:2, not Genesis 6:19I am not the one misquoting scripture but since it has been done lets clear the air: Genesis 6:19 New King James Version and Latin Vulgate. I cross referenced both and neither say anything close to maturity and not even "his" anything. Lets take a look:
Well, you certainly could have said that you were not referring to the verse I posted, you know, the one in the post that you quoted."And of every living thing of all flesh you shall bring two of every sort into the ark, to keep them alive with you; they shall be male and female." NKJV
"And of every living creature of all flesh, thou shalt bring two of a sort into the ark, that they may live with thee: Of the male sex, and the female." LV
As I said, I did not misrepresent scripture and it would be kind of everyone to not bear such untruths. Thanks in advance!
Your link says that hayah means "become" not "became". Hayah also means "to be" not just "become".
Umm hmm. Tell us another one.How can one let creatures that no longer existed onto the Ark? This is why no bones of man have never been found with them, because man did not yet exist.
As Herman already pointed out, that footprint would have been made by a giant. In fact, if the ratio found in this abstract is reliable, the person making that imprint would have been almost 13 feet tall!That would be so cool to have toes like that.
Mine look more like they've been broken
and bound up since I was 5.
This picture suggests they've been kissing.
Are you having trouble reading the verse I quoted? It clearly uses "male and his female" in reference to both clean and unclean animals. I don't understand how you missed it.
"and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female."
False. You gave information that the earth had a (somewhat) higher O2 count hundreds of millions of years ago. The Flood, according to YECs like yourself, happened less than 5,000 years ago.
You should also never remove words from the Bible, as you have done here by removing the word "his" from the verse. As I already pointed out in the post you quoted, Genesis 7:2 clearly says "male and his female". That is obviously a mated pair. Other translations of the Bible make this even more clear as they specifically state "male and his mate".
If it wasn't intended to refer to a mated pair, then it would have said simply "a male and a female".
Is that it? Some known frauds and scams that were discovered and exposed by science are not going to falsify mainstream science as a whole, as you seem to require for your beliefs to be true.
It would seem that you think a scandal at an observatory would falsify modern astrophysics, cosmology, and the standard model of physics, all of which seem to conflict with what you have told me of your beliefs.
You did no such thing.
People who want to believe otherwise are following a theory based on a lot of misinterpreted data and extrapolated by men and women that are not afraid to fake, alter, hide, dismiss, and ignore data."
The problem is that the few actual frauds on the list you provided aren't what the theory is based on. No one is writing papers or learning about Nebraska Man or Archeoraptor as if they're fact. They're old news. Creationists like you keep presenting stuff like that as if you're going to shock people to the core, but it has no effect, because most of us have heard that stuff a thousand times. It has no bearing on the theory.
Just pointing out a few on the list.
No, it isn't. Name one textbook that talks about it and presents the drawings as 'truth'. You won't be able to, because this is just a common creationist lie.
This changed the earths atmosphere and the large animals, like brontosaurus, were unable to adapt.
This changed the earths atmosphere and the large animals, like brontosaurus, were unable to adapt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?