Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dinosaurs and Humans Coexisting! (My Thoughts on the Creation Museum)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tree of Life" data-source="post: 71632601" data-attributes="member: 325007"><p>I had the privilege of spending the day at the Creation Museum recently. Here's my thoughts...</p><p></p><p>It should first be noted that every view in relation to Genesis 1 and making sense of it in light of modern science has problems - including views that allow for theistic evolution.</p><p></p><p>While I hold to the "Regular Day View" (the days in Genesis 1 correspond to normal days), I do not see eye-to-eye with the Creation Museum. There are really only two routes to go if one holds to the RDV. The CM goes one way and I go another. Either:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The earth is young and God created it in 6 literal days. Modern scientific consensus is profoundly <strong>wrong</strong>. But science, when done properly with YEC assumptions, actually shows a young earth. Dinosaurs co-existed with mankind and there were dinosaurs on Noah's ark.<br /> <br /> <strong>OR</strong><br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The earth is young and God created it in 6 literal days. Modern science is not wrong. It's right. However, God created a mature world with apparent age. God created trees with rings. Adam appeared 30 years old when in reality he was only 1 day old. God created the earth with oil deposits in it. And God created the world with dinosaur bones in it. But dinosaurs did not actually walk the earth.</li> </ol><p>Both of these views have some level of absurdity, but I think that route (1) above is most absurd of the two. Since I hold to the RDV I am forced to admit that (2) above is the case, although it also has some absurdities of its own.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the Creation Museum has further convinced me that there is no way that (1) above is true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tree of Life, post: 71632601, member: 325007"] I had the privilege of spending the day at the Creation Museum recently. Here's my thoughts... It should first be noted that every view in relation to Genesis 1 and making sense of it in light of modern science has problems - including views that allow for theistic evolution. While I hold to the "Regular Day View" (the days in Genesis 1 correspond to normal days), I do not see eye-to-eye with the Creation Museum. There are really only two routes to go if one holds to the RDV. The CM goes one way and I go another. Either: [LIST=1] [*]The earth is young and God created it in 6 literal days. Modern scientific consensus is profoundly [B]wrong[/B]. But science, when done properly with YEC assumptions, actually shows a young earth. Dinosaurs co-existed with mankind and there were dinosaurs on Noah's ark. [B]OR[/B] [*]The earth is young and God created it in 6 literal days. Modern science is not wrong. It's right. However, God created a mature world with apparent age. God created trees with rings. Adam appeared 30 years old when in reality he was only 1 day old. God created the earth with oil deposits in it. And God created the world with dinosaur bones in it. But dinosaurs did not actually walk the earth. [/LIST] Both of these views have some level of absurdity, but I think that route (1) above is most absurd of the two. Since I hold to the RDV I am forced to admit that (2) above is the case, although it also has some absurdities of its own. Anyway, the Creation Museum has further convinced me that there is no way that (1) above is true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dinosaurs and Humans Coexisting! (My Thoughts on the Creation Museum)
Top
Bottom