Dinosaur Duck Discovered!!

[Bungle_Bear]

Well, I'm running out of analogies, so I thought the chu-chu-train example might help?

If you didn't like this one, look at the previous ones,, there is one for all ages, and levels of indoctrination.

It's the same message, it's that; Evolutionists claim evolution/speciation doesn't happen, .. NEVER happens.

Do you believe in Biological Evolution, because as you can see, you would be believing in something that even they admit never happens!?

I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but you twist pretty much everything that anyone says and play back a parody of what has actually been posted. Like I said, strawmen are much more amusing than reality.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Depressed, .. nothing that repentance on bended knees can't fix. And you will jump and sing with joy, I promise!

No, what would fix it is if you actually take the time and be sincere and actually learn about the thing your supposed to be criticizing.
Or just stop wasting people's time and actually admit that you are all just pulling out collective legs with these insipid tirades.

 

[HitchSlap]

Depressed, .. nothing that repentance on bended knees can't fix. And you will jump and sing with joy, I promise!

You know as well as I do that prayer doesn’t work. No need to tell porkies, we’re all adults here.

 

[Jimmy D]

The fact is that the plane arrives in Phoenix. But your gorilla NEVER arrives into human, they all stay different shades of gorillas. You guys, listening to your Pastor Dawkins admitted over and over again that "Never does one species of animal of ANY peticular kind change into, or speciate into a different species."
You all admit "Evolution Never Happens!"



Exactly, you keep admitting and even showing examples of how Evolution, specifically "speciation" NEVER HAPPENS!
Just like in my clear examples, you just keep reinforcing them. Thank you.



Again, if you cant understand something doesn't mean you are correct. I tried and tried to help you out, so here I go again:

Instead of preaching to me, put names of species to all those color gradients, we have 8 million living species to choose from, what you need is less than a hundred that you have in your colorful word example. And maybe, .. hopefully, prayerfully you will see the light!?



I understand what you are trying to show me friend, but that is NOT what we see through scientific observation. Besides, without naming each color gradient as either quantum particles, or cells, or animals, you show nothing. What could I, a beginner biological scientist get out of a bunch of color gradients? Or from observing how the French Language evolved?

Like I said, if you call them cells, they remain cells.
Look: Let's take all the nuts and bolts, all the sheets of metal, glass, carpet etc. that's needed to build a car, and put it in a big pile.
From that I can build you a motorcycle.
Now would you call that motorcycle a pile of junk, or a motorcycle?
I can go on adding to that motorcycle till we have a little car. Now what would you call this car, a motorcycle?
So stop with the theatrics, with all the hand waving, you are not that good of a magician, you got all them cards falling out of your sleeve, .. lol.



I know what you are saying, isn't that enough for here? We have everything we need about this Evolution (falsely labeld) theory right under our fingertips, Google it!
And you are saying the same thing that your Pastor Dawkins is saying, that; "No species of animal has ever, nor will they EVER change, speciate, mutate or give birth to another species of animal", which in scientific terms (not according to the Wonderful and magical world of Evolution like Disneyworld) but in science means that Evolution Does NOT Happen, .. never happened and will never happen. Can't get any clearer than that.



Just how much more historical evidence do you want me to show you regarding how evil, hateful, discriminating, humiliating and dangerous this Evolution Religious Belief System really is?



No, because I agree that the biological definition of an Evolutionist should be "animal", as I have shown you over and over again pointing to History. And yes, unfortunately they were human at one time.



I quoted from the words of the Creator Himself: We were all made from the dust of the earth, but man/human is not categorized as animal, God, and Gods Words hating humans did that. Matter of fact, a man can loose himself and act like an animal just like some of those Evolutionists that have given themselves over to Satan, who make a big party and tie down black youths on a dining table and eat them alive, or those other possessed and/or drugged up humans who attack and eat other humans right out on the streets.
Funny how even Evolutionists will call these animal offspring of theirs: "animals", .. LOL
What do you suppose they meant by that? Don't all carnivores eat meat?



I believe The Creator is referring to man as a biological make-up of human, and to animals as a biological make up of animal. I wasn't referring to Evolution- fairytales of "Long, long time ago of places far, far away" which is the only thing separating Gods biological Creation and Evolution, .. a far fetched, never observed fairytale.
Same with the Big-Bang story.



Just as our Creator has done, and is doing, .. preparing Mansions for us in Heaven after he destroys our present physical home earth, and this body He made out of quantum dust particles, and puts us in that New upgraded Heavenly home and body!

It's really amazing to me to see intelligent adults like yourself think so childish as to claim that we humans are the only ones who can plan, and intelligently design things, but the things we didn't, or the things we cant even imagine to create, like all the materials for our own creations, .. well that, .. no one did! "That just popped out of nothing, and in nothing it expanded.

It's like watching a stubborn five year old stumping his feet because another person makes better things than what he can.
Like man creates the Honda ASIMO robot copying God's human creation, and claim that; his was intelligently planned out, designed and built which took hundreds of engineers and programmers, over the span of 100 years, .. but the actual human that they are copying: "Oh that thing, that engineer there? Bah, .. just a terrible design because that thing, that, that animal just popped out of a wet muddy puddle, and naturally, over millions and billions and trillions of years it assembled itself through mutation influenced by chaotic events like earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, meteor showers, frozen then overheated and there it is!" Stumps his feet and says: "So there, .. humpf!"



Wow, "just preaching", .. really? I just shown you how we create computer worlds and creatures, and compared it to what the Bible says how God created everything! You being a computer engineer should have jumped out of your skin to have been actually shown such revelation.
Our own little computer worlds, including the people, buildings, ..everything is exactly how God creates (except on an almost infinitely more complex scale), and I could go into this in far greater detail, because in these last days God is revealing more of these things for us. And all you have to say is "This is all just preaching"

Here is preaching:

Big Bang - Wikipedia
The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale evolution - Wikipedia

Lol, .. "from the earliest known, periods", .. yep "known", because this is science speaking, with scientists observing the Big Bang as it happened exactly, .. umm, .. 7, 9, 10, 13, umm 14 billion solar years ago!

"Yes.... carbon dating the redshift tint we get from our radio telescope gives us the exact dates"



When you have absolutely no science behind claims, only cruel things like I shown about the aborigines and Ota Benga and many other negroes, ,Indians, Mexicans, Jews and other so called "sub-humans" yes, it is insulting. It has murdered millions of people, and has been, and continued to be used to discriminate. Not only that, but it is the main force behind Chem Trailing, abortion, deforestation, heating up our atmosphere, pollution used to justify these New World shattering Agendas against the very existence of humanity, and all biological life on it.



So what? What does what I tell you here have to do anything with Christians?

I believe in our Infinite Creator, NOT some deified fallen angel (ghost or demon) who resides in the supernatural realm, who divines to mediums witches and warlocks. I believe in Jesus Christ, not some Christian sun-god.
The Christians are the ones who invented the Big Bang story, so of course the majority of Christians believe in the Christian Evolution. Soon, All Christians will believe in it, not just the majority!



Sure you do, "sustainable development", the "Transhumanist Agenda" "Biodiversity" "Recycle", .. surely you heard of the "Recycle Agenda?

and all the other plans to turning all children from the sex they were born with, to the opposite sex so they could no longer reproduce! Renew, .. Recycle, .. kill, mutilate, robotize, brain wash through MK-ultra etc.



It has everything to do with Biology, .. HPV, flaurix etc. listen to Bill Gates and his extermination plans with a syringe. Evolution story is all about making everyone (all white, and dark skinned labeled sub-human) believe and accept that they are animals, and, as our God given duty to manage and rule over the animals, this nation has chosen itself to do just that.

Look up "Georgia Guide Stones"



You mean what universe filled with galaxies that you live in, not me. I live on earth, not the heaven where the stars are, and not yet in Gods heaven.



Oh yes, another "Hubble Artist renderings", what is all this represent? Oh yes, I can see them now: Niflheim, Muspelheim, Asgard, Midgard, Jotunheim, Vanaheim, Alfheim, Svartalfheim, Helheim.

Here is without the Hubble artist dude who works in his little Hubble studio at NASA. His other job is to pick up the Mars Rover in the desert when it gets stuck.

It's what we see, what real science claims, .. or what they used to anyways, since now science is dead R.I.P. science.

No, they revolve around above the earth, to give us a pretty night-light, and so we can navigate.​

[/quote][/quote][/QUOTE]

 

[doubtingmerle]

Sure would feel sorry for that poor woman, .. I pray that an embryo never becomes an adult.

How do you plan to keep all embryos from growing into adults?

Abortions?

 

[doubtingmerle]

No, they revolve around above the earth, to give us a pretty night-light, and so we can navigate.​

Ever hear of Copernicus?

 

[Arius]

I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but you twist pretty much everything that anyone says and play back a parody of what has actually been posted. Like I said, strawmen are much more amusing than reality.

@Warden_of_the_Storm , @HitchSlap , @Jimmy D @doubtingmerle

OK, before you guys have me kicked off this Forum, .. again:
Do you, or do you not believe in the Evolution theory, where this so called theory claims that we humans evolved from amoeba, then a population of amoeba over the span of billions of years transitioned on to gorillas, and from gorillas a a population of gorillas evolved and transitioned into humans!?

Transition:
Definition of transition. 1 a : passage from one state, stage, subject, or place to another : change. b : a movement, development, or evolution from one form, stage, or style to another.

as in "transitioning fossils"

evolve:
1. develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
"the company has evolved into a major chemical manufacturer"
synonyms: develop, progress, advance

as in "a population of gorillas, over millions of years evolved into a population of humans" (I have posted evidence what Evolutionists considered these "population of humans" to be)

If so, then PLEASE, can you explain to me how "fossils", which are fossilized bugs and animal remains dug up from graves, can transition or evolve over millions and even billions of years from a simpler state, into a another more complex species; like gorilla fossils to human?

I said already that I agree with evolutionists that no animal of any kind has ever speciated, turned, morphed or gave birth to another completely different species, .. so this is about what Evolutionists Scientist use as "evidence of Evolution", .. fossils.

Thank you.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

@Warden_of_the_Storm , @HitchSlap , @Jimmy D @doubtingmerle

OK, before you guys have me kicked off this Forum, .. again:
Do you, or do you not believe in the Evolution theory, where this so called theory claims that we humans evolved from amoeba, then a population of amoeba over the span of billions of years transitioned on to gorillas, and from gorillas a a population of gorillas evolved and transitioned into humans!?

No. We are are not descendants of gorillas. Gorillas and humans have a common ancestor.

as in "a population of gorillas, over millions of years evolved into a population of humans

If you replace "gorillas" with our common ancestor, then that is correct. Populations evolve, individuals do not.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

@Warden_of_the_Storm , @HitchSlap , @Jimmy D @doubtingmerle

OK, before you guys have me kicked off this Forum, .. again:
Do you, or do you not believe in the Evolution theory, where this so called theory claims that we humans evolved from amoeba, then a population of amoeba over the span of billions of years transitioned on to gorillas, and from gorillas a a population of gorillas evolved and transitioned into humans!?

Transition:
Definition of transition. 1 a : passage from one state, stage, subject, or place to another : change. b : a movement, development, or evolution from one form, stage, or style to another.

as in "transitioning fossils"

evolve:
1. develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
"the company has evolved into a major chemical manufacturer"
synonyms: develop, progress, advance

as in "a population of gorillas, over millions of years evolved into a population of humans" (I have posted evidence what Evolutionists considered these "population of humans" to be)

If so, then PLEASE, can you explain to me how "fossils", which are fossilized bugs and animal remains dug up from graves, can transition or evolve over millions and even billions of years from a simpler state, into a another more complex species; like gorilla fossils to human?

I said already that I agree with evolutionists that no animal of any kind has ever speciated, turned, morphed or gave birth to another completely different species, .. so this is about what Evolutionists Scientist use as "evidence of Evolution", .. fossils.

Thank you.

I don't believe in evolution, I accept it.
But what I don't accept is your messed up version of evolution. Humans didn't evolve from gorillas. We evolved from a common ancestor that we shared with gorillas.

 

[Jimmy D]

OK, before you guys have me kicked off this Forum, .. again:

I doubt anyone wants you kicked off the forum.

Do you, or do you not believe in the Evolution theory

Yep, although it's probably more accurate to say I "accept it" due to the preponderance of evidence and to a lesser extent, the lack of a credible alternative explanation.

where this so called theory claims that we humans evolved from amoeba, then a population of amoeba over the span of billions of years transitioned on to gorillas, and from gorillas a a population of gorillas evolved and transitioned into humans!?

Transition:
Definition of transition. 1 a : passage from one state, stage, subject, or place to another : change. b : a movement, development, or evolution from one form, stage, or style to another.

as in "transitioning fossils"

evolve:
1. develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
"the company has evolved into a major chemical manufacturer"
synonyms: develop, progress, advance

as in "a population of gorillas, over millions of years evolved into a population of humans" (I have posted evidence what Evolutionists considered these "population of humans" to be)

If so, then PLEASE, can you explain to me how "fossils", which are fossilized bugs and animal remains dug up from graves, can transition or evolve over millions and even billions of years from a simpler state, into a another more complex species; like gorilla fossils to human?

I said already that I agree with evolutionists that no animal of any kind has ever speciated, turned, morphed or gave birth to another completely different species, .. so this is about what Evolutionists Scientist use as "evidence of Evolution", .. fossils.

I'm not really sure what you're asking for.

 

[ViaCrucis]

I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but you twist pretty much everything that anyone says and play back a parody of what has actually been posted. Like I said, strawmen are much more amusing than reality.

That's the MO of that particular poster.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[Arius]

No. We are are not descendants of gorillas. Gorillas and humans have a common ancestor.


If you replace "gorillas" with our common ancestor, then that is correct. Populations evolve, individuals do not.

Thank you, .. is what I wanted to hear, nice of you to admit it LOL.

Remember sheeple, there is no "you" in the new human population, it's one for all and all for one, and one is all; dumb animals, every one of us.

I'm not even going to ask what species that "common ancestor" was. Probably an empty clone, .. lol.

 

[Arius]

I don't believe in evolution, I accept it.

Yes, I understand, I grew up in a strict Religion too. It's called "blind faith", we don't have a choice but to accept it.

But what I don't accept is your messed up version of evolution. Humans didn't evolve from gorillas. We evolved from a common ancestor that we shared with gorillas.

Like I told Bungle Bear, I won't even ask what "species" that population of animal that "common ancestor" was, .. human, gorilla, .. what? .. lol.

Hey, thank you guys for helping me get people to open their eyes.
But don't worry, neither an Evolutionist or a Christian will click on a "like" or an "agree" button in support of such wonderful revelations, .. they can't, just like you pointed it out above.[/QUOTE]

 

[Arius]

I doubt anyone wants you kicked off the forum.

Thank you.

Yep, although it's probably more accurate to say I "accept it" due to the preponderance of evidence and to a lesser extent, the lack of a credible alternative explanation.

OK, so you too ay? It's that population of animals called "Common Ancestor" that got you, isn't it?

I know you are not allowed to answer this, but what the heck, I'll ask you anyways: "Have you any idea what 'species' that 'population of animals' who Evolutionists call Common Ancestor were?"

I'm not really sure what you're asking for.

I spelled it out, .. and it's the same thing I am asking all of you Evolutionists: "What species of animals were the creatures that walked the earth that Evolutionists refer to as "common ancestor"?

Example: Were they gorilla, lizard, human, Nephilim, .. what?

OK here is a documentary, you guys say that man did NOT evolve from gorillas, so what gorilla/human looking creatures were these shown in this video?

I believe she is referring to them as Neanderthals, .. but what "species" were they? Human or gorilla, .. or what? See the skull the lady is holding, she believes these were our ancestors, so for Pete sake, what "species" were these "common ancestors"???

Is "common ancestor" a species between every species before they turn into a completely different species?
Is "species" a type of species? How else could I put this?

Dawkins says: "More distantly related are gorillas" and points to a 'T', and calls this evolving gorilla "Common Ancestor" Time 0:43

What "species" was this common ancestor??

 

[Arius]

Again:

Time 0:21 "We did not descend from chimpanzees we both (humans and chips) descended from a "Common Ancestor, who lived (points to a 'T' on the graph) there!"

Now for the final time, "what species" was this animal/creature that your Pastor Dawkins is pointing to, which he calls "Common Ancestor"?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yes, I understand, I grew up in a strict Religion too. It's called "blind faith", we don't have a choice but to accept it.

No, my acceptance of evolution is not religious. It's looking at the evidence that is given by scientists and agreeing with that they say.

Like I told Bungle Bear, I won't even ask what "species" that population of animal that "common ancestor" was, .. human, gorilla, .. what? .. lol.

Hey, thank you guys for helping me get people to open their eyes.
But don't worry, neither an Evolutionist or a Christian will click on a "like" or an "agree" button in support of such wonderful revelations, .. they can't, just like you pointed it out above.

[/QUOTE]

God, you're unbelievably dense.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Remember sheeple, there is no "you" in the new human population, it's one for all and all for one, and one is all; dumb animals, every one of us.

When people like you make that sort of comment, all it does is show how you really think. Nothing else.

 

[doubtingmerle]

Now for the final time, "what species" was this animal/creature that your Pastor Dawkins is pointing to, which he calls "Common Ancestor"?

You are looking for the name of a species that has not yet been found? It does not work that way. When someone finds the new species, then it will be named.

We have found many intermediates between us and the common ancestor with gorillas. Those have been named.

How can you explain that we found those intermediates?

 

[Arius]

You are looking for the name of a species that has not yet been found? It does not work that way. When someone finds the new species, then it will be named.

We have found many intermediates between us and the common ancestor with gorillas. Those have been named.

How can you explain that we found those intermediates?

Awesome, .. let's call this Common Ancestor "Intermediates", or the "unfound species", or, "the Missing Link", .. alright, good, .. let's go with that.
Now they have the skull of this "Intermediate, unfound species AKA Missing Link", .. now can they tell what species it is?
Is it gorilla, is it human, or is it a Nephilim, .. what?

I know this much, that todays scientists can tell from bones they study what species it belongs to, especially a skull. So what do they say this skull is, .. a gorilla, or human?

They tell us that it, .. whatever this "mystery" species is, .. evolved into human, .. that much we know. That it is our ancestor, so going by that, they found a human skull, .. whooppedidooda! They can dig up any human grave and find all kinds of different human skulls, like the Aborigines they murdered and boiled down their skulls, they looked something like that too, only problem is that they too were human.

Here is your problem, if we say that this "missing link" species is a gorilla, then it's a gorilla skull, and the millions and billions of years it was buried in the ground was a skull of a gorilla, .. so what? Where does this prove "Evolution/Speciation" that justifies these God, and humans haters to call me an animal of the gorilla family, and call my ancestors rats!?

 

[Arius]

No, my acceptance of evolution is not religious. It's looking at the evidence that is given by scientists and agreeing with that they say

I was quoting your scientists and what they say, .. that is what my part of the debate is about, what "they say", .. so what is it that they say, .. I'm still waiting??

I pointed out "what he, the most famous Evolutionary scientist of your day" said in the above video when he pointed to a branching off, a "T" which comes from gorillas, then branches off, one goes to human, and the other to chimp and bonobo.
He called this "T" (aka branching off) a "Common Ancestor". He did not provide a Peleoartist rendered image of this creature, which is why I'm asking you; what does your Religion say that this creature, this animal or whatever it is that you call "Common Ancestor" is? Is it human, is it a gorilla, is it a puma, a rat, a Jew (we have been labeled many different species many times over the thousands of years), so .. what is the "T" that Dawkins is pointing at??

Wait, .. maybe Dawkins means it is not even an animal, but maybe an alien creature from Tatooine! You know, that New planet NASA just discovered in the pile of artist rendered paintings!?

God, you're unbelievably dense.

Coming from a member of this Religious Cult called "Evolution", .. I say that is a complement. A step down from calling me an animal of the ape family, who's "not so distant" cousins are gorillas and rats. Have you seen Dawkins depiction of that white middle-aged woman's "Family photo collage" amongst apes and chimps and other hairy animals? If that lady was a real person, I suggest she sue the pants of Dawkins. Why didn't he put 'his' picture in there, with his ape wife and kids, .. huh?

Hasn't this Religion degraded, humiliated and sacrificed enough innocent lives over its relatively short existence?
Do you want me to show you more evidence what believers of this Religion have done throughout its History? Because I can!