Merlin
Paradigm Buster
- Sep 29, 2005
- 3,873
- 845
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Private
The Bible doesn't refer to bats as birds though.So, what do you make of the fossil record? Why are the animals so much stranger the further down the geological strata we go? And are you ok with animal death before the fall?
About which organisms are alive. Have you thought about other biblical classifications, namely the one beloved of atheists, that bats are a type of bird (Lev 11). Now I don't have a problem with that at all. Categories are arbitrary, it is as legitimate to divide animals into beasts of the field, livestock and creepy crawlies; as it is to classify according to biological relationship. Mountain goats and domesticated goats are the same genus. Yet it is perfectly legitimate to classify them according to another aspect, their relationship to humans, wild or domesticated. Birds and bats fall into the same biblical category as animals with wings. Nothing wrong with that as long as you don't mistake it for our modern classification of birds and think the bible says bats belong to Class Aves. But given we have these biblical classifications, it is worth pointing out that 'birds' includes not only birds and bats, but also locusts, which as an insect without nostrils you are not sure is even alive. It is one thing to place birds and bats in the same category, but non living creatures too?
Some English translations do.
It is the translator that put them in the same group 'birds'
Upvote
0