• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Did Kenneth Hagin Commit Plagiarism?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Plagiarism, Kenyon and the Word Of Faith Movement

Kenneth Hagin apparently had no conscience about copying word for word his "revelations" of the Word of Faith from Kenyon's books, published some time earlier...

The original works are the rights of KENYON'S GOSPEL PUBLISHING SOCIETY.


E.W. Kenyon

"The twenty-second psalm gives a praphic picture of the crucifixion of Jesus. It is more vivid than that of John, Matthew or Mark who witnessed it. But he says the strangest words, "But thou art holy." What does that mean? He is becoming sin....

(What Happened From the Cross to the Throne [Seattle: Kenyon's Gospel Publishing Society, 1969, 44-51])


Kenneth E. Hagin Sr.

"The 22nd psalm gives a graphic picture of the crucifixion of Jesus- more vivid than that of John, Matthew or Mark witnessed it. He utters the strangest words "But thou are holy." What does that mean? He is becoming sin..."

("Christ our Substitute", The Word of Faith [March 1975]), pp.1,4,5,7)

Excerpted...more at intotruth.org

http://www.intotruth.org/wof/kenyon.html



This is a comparison list of 8 books by Kenyon and 8 by Hagin. Compare them, then decide. As well, read what Kenyon's daughter has to say about this.

The eight books by Hagin stretch from 1973-81. Rhema Bible Training Center was founded in 1974.

Talk about sad.
 

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
ProAmerican said:
Plagiarism, Kenyon and the Word Of Faith Movement

Kenneth Hagin apparently had no conscience about copying word for word his "revelations" of the Word of Faith from Kenyon's books, published some time earlier...

The original works are the rights of KENYON'S GOSPEL PUBLISHING SOCIETY.


E.W. Kenyon

"The twenty-second psalm gives a praphic picture of the crucifixion of Jesus. It is more vivid than that of John., Matthew or Mark who witnessed it. But he says the strangest words, "But thou art holy." What does that mean? He is becoming sin....

(What Happened From the Cross to the Throne [Seattle: Kenyon's Gospel Publishing Society, 1969, 44-51])


Kenneth E. Hagin Sr.

"The 22nd psalm gives a graphic picture of the crucifixion of Jesus- more vivid than that of John, Matthew or Mark witnessed it. He utters the strangest words "But thou are holy." What does that mean? He is becoming sin..."

("Christ our Substitute", The Word of Faith [March 1975]), pp.1,4,5,7)

Excerpted...more at intotruth.org

http://www.intotruth.org/wof/kenyon.html



This is a comparison list of 8 books by Kenyon and 8 by Hagin. Compare them, then decide. As well, read what Kenyon's daughter has to say about this.

The eight books by Hagin stretch from 1973-81. Rhema Bible Training Center was founded in 1974.

Talk about sad.


Here's something to add to the mix.


Hagin church service where a red-headed woman is "mooing" and "baaing".

Real One Player http://www.pawcreek.org/wsamples/PCM_Hagin_Clip.rm

Windows Media http://www.pawcreek.org/wsamples/PCM_Hagin_Clip.wmv


My advice for Pentecostals, of which I am one, is to stay away from Haginism, or what could be called woferism.
 
Upvote 0

M Paul

Active Member
Jun 20, 2005
135
2
Visit site
✟276.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Hagin's plagerism has been documented for a long time now. And, his refusal to respond to the charge didn't help any defense for him.

However, it also has been noted, that Hagin was not an educated man, and it is said he may have not understood the significance of quoting or formally how it is done.

I have to admit--with the uneducated, such misunderstandings are possible. Then, the significance of the plagerism is the source.

Regards,

Paul
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
M Paul said:
Hagin's plagerism has been documented for a long time now. And, his refusal to respond to the charge didn't help any defense for him.

However, it also has been noted, that Hagin was not an educated man, and it is said he may have not understood the significance of quoting or formally how it is done.

I have to admit--with the uneducated, such misunderstandings are possible. Then, the significance of the plagerism is the source.

Regards,

Paul

You would be surprised, though, of how many people are unaware of what has been documented concerning Hagin's apparent plagiarism.

Hagin did respond, though, and did not clear the problem when he had the chance. Looks like he swept the whole thing, as they say, 'under the rug'.

Kenneth Hagin:
"Kenyon's influence on my ministry has been minute. Only his teachings on the name of Jesus have much to do with my theology. I absolutely deny any metaphysical influences from Kenyon....

Vinson Synan, "The Faith of Kenneth Hagin", Charisma & Christian Faith, 15:11 (June 1990), 68)
 
Upvote 0

M Paul

Active Member
Jun 20, 2005
135
2
Visit site
✟276.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
You would be surprised, though, of how many people are unaware of what has been documented concerning Hagin's apparent plagiarism.

Yes, I know. Because of that, I review it in an article on my web page--"What is Faith?" at a bottom section. It's not pleasant to bring up--but at times, it does seem necessary.

Regards,

Paul
 
Upvote 0

M Paul

Active Member
Jun 20, 2005
135
2
Visit site
✟276.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
catlover said:
Wesley was accused of plagarism and so was Ellen White, this is not an uncommon accusation against religious leaders people disagree with.

Hagin's plagerism is thoroughly documented. An above post indicates Hagin did finally make some type of response to the charge, but why did he never respond to what has been documented?? Evidence is evidence--that must be answered point by point, not dismissed by some generalized statement.

A Different Gospel quotes earlier works of Kenyon in one column and works of Hagin in another, and they are identical and there are a lot of them. Only by addressing this evidence is there an effective answer to the charge.

However, I'm not saying we should condemn Hagin if there is no answer. I do say it changes the perspective of his teaching.

Regards,

Paul
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
catlover said:
Wesley was accused of plagarism and so was Ellen White, this is not an uncommon accusation against religious leaders people disagree with.

1.) An accusation against a religious leader is one thing, and substantial documentation is quite another. Is there substantial documentation that Wesley or White committed plagiarism? If not, then it is just an accusation, and should not be lumped in with Hagin. That would blur the lines.

2.)There is ample evidence/documentation that Hagin, did indeed, copy word-for-word from Kenyon and never once gave him credit for his teachings. Later, when questioned on his apparent plagiaristic ways, Hagin, it seems to many, lied right through his teeth. Hagin had a chance to clear up thge matter and didn't. If Hagin didn't know about the rules of citing sources, and thereby giving credit to Kenyon, then he should have come out and said he didn't know. That right there makes Hagin highly suspect, and casts a dark shadsow on the credibility of his minisry.

3.) Here's a matter more disturbing than that, though:

Hagin said that he denied any metaphysical influences frm Kenyon. Hagin called Kenyon a metaphysicist. Why then, did Hagin copy word-for-word from a metaphysicist?

Secondly, even if Kenyon was or wasn't a metaphysicist, why would Hagin dare to even copy word-for-word from one(Kenyon) he considered to be a metaphysicist?
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
M Paul said:
Hagin's plagerism is thoroughly documented. An above post indicates Hagin did finally make some type of response to the charge, but why did he never respond to what has been documented?? Evidence is evidence--that must be answered point by point, not dismissed by some generalized statement.

A Different Gospel quotes earlier works of Kenyon in one column and works of Hagin in another, and they are identical and there are a lot of them. Only by addressing this evidence is there an effective answer to the charge.

However, I'm not saying we should condemn Hagin if there is no answer. I do say it changes the perspective of his teaching.

Regards,

Paul

I was wondering what you might have to say concerning 2.) and 3.) on the post directly above this one.
 
Upvote 0

M Paul

Active Member
Jun 20, 2005
135
2
Visit site
✟276.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I was wondering what you might have to say concerning 2.) and 3.) on the post directly above this one.

Well, what is documented appears to be blatant plagerism. However, Hagin never addressed what is documented--so we really don't know what happened.

I've seen Hagin preach. It was a wonderful service. He seemed like a wonderful person. I think he loved Jesus and served him with all his heart.

I think Hagin may have copied the works without being educated well enough to understand the significance of quoting, and then, when he was in circumstances way over his head, he tried to fudge his way through. Only God knows. Let's forgive him and not be too hard on him.

However, I believe "name it and claim it" theology is clearly wrong and sends people off in an incorrect direction. I write against it on my web site. But there is and has been a lot of incorrect theology out there, and people get by. Focusing on the blood of Christ is what counts.

It is amazing though--how many highly successful ministries in bringing people to Christ are Faith Movement. God is blessing the movement and using it to win souls; no one can doubt that. And, the Faith Movement people I've known are very fine people. I'd rather be with them, than most people I know who are correct in every detail of theology.

Regards,

Paul
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
M Paul said:
Well, what is documented appears to be blatant plagerism. However, Hagin never addressed what is documented--so we really don't know what happened.

I've seen Hagin preach. It was a wonderful service. He seemed like a wonderful person. I think he loved Jesus and served him with all his heart.

I think Hagin may have copied the works without being educated well enough to understand the significance of quoting, and then, when he was in circumstances way over his head, he tried to fudge his way through. Only God knows. Let's forgive him and not be too hard on him.

Hagin apparently copied word-for-word from kenyon without documentation. Not only is that deception, but that is a criminal offense(s). Apparently there were multiple acts of plagiarism over an eight year period.

Either Hagin did or didn't know that he was supposed to quote.

Even if Hagin didn't know that he was supposed to quote, when it came out to the public that Hagin had been caught, it was his responsibility to come out and say, I didn't know that I was supposed to give documentation and credit to Kenyon.

But let's say that Hagin did know what he was doing, that he was intentionally and knowingly commiting plagiarism. He still had the responsibilty to come out and admit what he had done.

In either case, he didn't do what he should have done. It seems that he pulled a 'Clinton' and denied, denied, denied.

Kenneth Hagin
Kenyon's influence on my ministry has been minute. Only his teaching's on the name of Jesus have much to do with my theology. I absolutely deny any metaphysical influences from Kenyon.

M Paul said:
It is amazing though--how many highly successful ministries in bringing people to Christ are Faith Movement. God is blessing the movement and using it to win souls; no one can doubt that. And, the Faith Movement people I've known are very fine people. I'd rather be with them, than most people I know who are correct in every detail of theology.

Regards,

Paul

But how many are staying? It's not how many are initially saved. What counts is how many are "enduring to the end."

"He that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved."

Being correct in every detail of theology isn't what matters. What matters is being right on core doctrinal issues, that are necessary for salvation, not peripheral issues like when the 'rapture' will take place.

Some, if not many, Wofers are way out in left field on core doctrinal issues.
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,635
4,392
Midlands
Visit site
✟748,518.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is a direct quote from the E.W. Kenyon website:

"...In his book A Different Gospel, author D.R. McConnell goes to some length to show that Kenneth Hagin plagiarized the writings of E. W. Kenyon. Some have contacted the office of Kenyon’s Gospel Publishing Society quite irritated about this situation. So what is our response?

First of all, it must be noted that Kenneth Hagin, to the best of my knowledge does not actually write his books. What I mean by this is that his books are for the most part transcriptions of his speaking ministry. Someone transcribes the taped messages and then they are edited and put into book form. Those who are preachers understand that it is impossible to stop and credit everyone who influenced your message while you are preaching. As someone who has been preaching and teaching for around 20 years, I shudder to think what would happen if I were called upon to remember each author or speaker who had influenced any given message I teach.

Anyone listening to me preach who was familiar with E.W. Kenyon would recognize many of his ideas in my preaching. The thoughtful listener would also recognize many other influences in my speaking ministry. This would be confirmed by my personal library of books and tapes.

One respected Charismatic leader, who has since gone on to be with the Lord, said of E.W. Kenyon that he was often quoted, yet seldom footnoted. Many people have absorbed his phrases and echoed his ideas. I have heard Kenneth Hagin personally testify to the fact that many of the phrases he has used and ideas he has taught, he heard from some other preachers before he ever heard of E.W. Kenyon. It is quite possible that they were quoting Kenyon and using his material and Kenneth Hagin didn’t know the original source. Liking the sound of the phrases, Hagin added them to his preaching vocabulary.

Hagin has noted that he has an almost photographic memory. Reading or hearing something once was all that was necessary for him to recall it verbatim. Every preacher wishes he had this ability! Most of us remember what we can but seldom remember where we heard it. But most preachers have no need to become paranoid about someone chastising us for quoting another author or preacher in our messages and being accused of plagiarism either! Brother Hagin has not been so fortunate.

A second thought that bears on this subject: All of those ministers who worked with Kenyon used his terminology and catchy phrases. It’s would be hard to imagine him being offended by this. People enjoy Kenyon’s writings because he had a unique way of stating things that grabs our attention. People seldom imitate boring speakers! Kenyon would probably be delighted to find that so many are using his phraseology today. In his day he sent forth many ministers that he trained in his churches and Bible schools who preached essentially his message. A father in the faith is blessed when his children imitate him, not angered.

A third point: Kenneth Hagin published a book titled The Name of Jesus. The book was taken from tapes of a seminar where he taught through Kenyon’s book The Wonderful Name of Jesus. He credits Kenyon both on the tapes and in the introduction to the book. He worked, through his editor, with Kenyon’s Gospel Publishing Society and had the complete approval of Ruth Kenyon Housworth (Kenyon’s late daughter) for the book when it went to print. Hagin’s ministry has always maintained a good relationship with Kenyon’s Gospel Publishing Society. One of Kenyon’s books is used in the curriculum at Hagin’s Rhema Bible Training Center.

We consider Kenneth E. Hagin to be a great man of God. If E.W. Kenyon were here today, he and Hagin would probably be good friends. And from his vantage point in heaven, Kenyon is probably delighted that Kenneth E. Hagin has been so successful in getting the message of faith, so dear to Kenyon’s heart, out to so many in the world in this generation.

If Kenyon himself wouldn’t be bothered about it all, why should anyone else? ..."
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
didaskalos said:
This is a direct quote from the E.W. Kenyon website:

"...In his book A Different Gospel, author D.R. McConnell goes to some length to show that Kenneth Hagin plagiarized the writings of E. W. Kenyon. Some have contacted the office of Kenyon’s Gospel Publishing Society quite irritated about this situation. So what is our response?

First of all, it must be noted that Kenneth Hagin, to the best of my knowledge does not actually write his books. What I mean by this is that his books are for the most part transcriptions of his speaking ministry. Someone transcribes the taped messages and then they are edited and put into book form. Those who are preachers understand that it is impossible to stop and credit everyone who influenced your message while you are preaching. As someone who has been preaching and teaching for around 20 years, I shudder to think what would happen if I were called upon to remember each author or speaker who had influenced any given message I teach.

That theory has been put forward before, but has not been yet substainated to be true. No evidence has been put forward that Hagin's apparent plagiarisms weren't just that, but were, instead, transcriptions from him speaking. For Hagin to have sentences in his sermons, that were later transcribed and put into book form, Hagin must have copied down what Kenyon wrote and preached them from his sermon notes.

What dosen't change, though, is that when Hagin later wrote the eight books linked to at the beginning of this thread into book form, he should have credited Kenyon.

All of what you linked to, didaskalos, is really just a smokescreen. What really matters, is that when those books of Hagin's(8) were analyzed, they were found to have multiple undocumented sentences from Kenyon. Yet, Hagin did not come out and credit Kenyon. Hagin could have later, but didn't. Amazing how everyone could that lots of what Hagin wrote(in those eight books) was, in fact, from Kenyon. Yet Hagin still did not bring himself to credit Kenyon. Anyone can see what Hagin said. I have listed that quote from Hagin more than once on this thread.

didaskalos said:
Anyone listening to me preach who was familiar with E.W. Kenyon would recognize many of his ideas in my preaching. The thoughtful listener would also recognize many other influences in my speaking ministry. This would be confirmed by my personal library of books and tapes.

One respected Charismatic leader, who has since gone on to be with the Lord, said of E.W. Kenyon that he was often quoted, yet seldom footnoted. Many people have absorbed his phrases and echoed his ideas. I have heard Kenneth Hagin personally testify to the fact that many of the phrases he has used and ideas he has taught, he heard from some other preachers before he ever heard of E.W. Kenyon. It is quite possible that they were quoting Kenyon and using his material and Kenneth Hagin didn’t know the original source. Liking the sound of the phrases, Hagin added them to his preaching vocabulary.

Hagin has noted that he has an almost photographic memory. Reading or hearing something once was all that was necessary for him to recall it verbatim. Every preacher wishes he had this ability! Most of us remember what we can but seldom remember where we heard it. But most preachers have no need to become paranoid about someone chastising us for quoting another author or preacher in our messages and being accused of plagiarism either! Brother Hagin has not been so fortunate.

None of what you said would be an issue if Hagin had come out and credited Kenyon when he had the chance. The question isn't how Kenyon's phrases got into Hagin's books.The question is how Hagin dealt with the issue, once it was raised by D.R. McConnell. Hagin, it could be said, pulled a 'Clinton': Deny, Deny, Deny. Look at the quote from hagin once again.

Hagin
Kenyon's influence on my ministry has been minute...I absolutely deny any metaphysical influences from Kenyon


didaskalos said:
A third point: Kenneth Hagin published a book titled The Name of Jesus. The book was taken from tapes of a seminar where he taught through Kenyon’s book The Wonderful Name of Jesus. He credits Kenyon both on the tapes and in the introduction to the book. He worked, through his editor, with Kenyon’s Gospel Publishing Society and had the complete approval of Ruth Kenyon Housworth (Kenyon’s late daughter) for the book when it went to print. Hagin’s ministry has always maintained a good relationship with Kenyon’s Gospel Publishing Society. One of Kenyon’s books is used in the curriculum at Hagin’s Rhema Bible Training Center.

We consider Kenneth E. Hagin to be a great man of God. If E.W. Kenyon were here today, he and Hagin would probably be good friends. And from his vantage point in heaven, Kenyon is probably delighted that Kenneth E. Hagin has been so successful in getting the message of faith, so dear to Kenyon’s heart, out to so many in the world in this generation.

If Kenyon himself wouldn’t be bothered about it all, why should anyone else? ..."

Hagin, in the quote I listed earlier in the thread, did state that Kenyon did have an influence on him when it came to the teachings on the name of Jesus. Hence, Hagin's apparent crediting of Kenyon on The Wonderful Name Of Jesus.

Regardless of what Kenyon's daughter said, or did not say, or what Kenyon's website says, even if they have no problem with Hagin's apparent plagiarism of Kenyon's writings. That still does not change the fact that Hagin, when given the chance later, apparently did not credit Kenyon, but, instead, it seems, stated that Kenyon's influnce on his ministry had been minute. When one looks at how much Hgain apparently copied word-for-word from Kenyon, you can see that Kenyon's influence on Hagin weren't minute but were instead substantial..

Kenneth Hagin
Kenyon's influence on my ministry has been minute...I absolutely deny any metaphysical influences from Kenyon.

Again, why would Hagin copy word-for-word from a man(Kenyon) that he himself, out of the words of his own mouth, considered to be a metaphysicist?

Why would Hagin even take the chance?
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
didaskalos said:
from the E.W. Kenyon website:

Hagin has noted that he has an almost photographic memory. Reading or hearing something once was all that was necessary for him to recall it verbatim. Every preacher wishes he had this ability! Most of us remember what we can but seldom remember where we heard it. But most preachers have no need to become paranoid about someone chastising us for quoting another author or preacher in our messages and being accused of plagiarism either! Brother Hagin has not been so fortunate.

Here's something additional...One of the biggest holes(that you could drive a Mack truck through) concerning Hagin's 'photographic memory' is that Hagin could somehow recall verbatim, but somehow just couldn't remember who said it. Amazing how he could remember all of this stuff, yet just couldn't remember that Kenyon is the one who said it.

No one is buying it!!!

While that site may say that most of us can remember what we can but seldom remember where we heard it, we don't have a photographic memory like Hagin supposedly had.

Sounds to me like that web site wants to have it both ways.


didaskalos said:
We consider Kenneth E. Hagin to be a great man of God. If E.W. Kenyon were here today, he and Hagin would probably be good friends. And from his vantage point in heaven, Kenyon is probably delighted that Kenneth E. Hagin has been so successful in getting the message of faith, so dear to Kenyon’s heart, out to so many in the world in this generation.

If Kenyon himself wouldn’t be bothered about it all, why should anyone else? ..."

First they say that Kenyon probably wouldn't be bothered by it all, then they jump to "If Kenyon wouldn't be bothered about it all"

What a leap!!!

Anyway, how do they know that Kenyon wouldn't be bothered by it all?
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,635
4,392
Midlands
Visit site
✟748,518.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Some may not have agreed with Hagin.. that's ok.
He was not a fool.
Only a fool would have intentionally copied word for word from a contemporary and think nobody would notice. Surely he would have known what he was doing was wrong.
I just find it hard to believe from a common sense point of view. Why would he intentionally do such a thing? Why would he think get would get away with it?
Does not make sense....
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
didaskalos said:
Some may not have agreed with Hagin.. that's ok.
He was not a fool.
Only a fool would have intentionally copied word for word from a contemporary and think nobody would notice. Surely he would have known what he was doing was wrong.
I just find it hard to believe from a common sense point of view. Why would he intentionally do such a thing? Why would he think get would get away with it?
Does not make sense....

To be a fool, or not to be a fool...that is not the question. Citing Shakespeare, with a twist!

It appears that Hagin did indeed copy word-for-word from Hagin. The answers that the website (which you supplied) gives are insufficient to explain why he would.

Chart of Contemporary Religious Figures Accused of Plagiarism in the Latter Half of the Twentieth Century to the Present

Copyright 2003, By William M. Alnor

"This chart is form an early, but incomplete draft from Professor William Alnor's doctoral dissertation from Temple University's Mass Media and Communications Program in April 2003."

"TBN founder Paul Crouch was accused in a lawsuit that was settled out of court with an undisclosed cash sum at the end of 2002 of plagiarising Sylvia Fleeners self-published book, The Omega Syndrome, In TBN's own book and film The Omega Code."

http://cultlink.com/plagiarism/plgchart.htm

My, my, the name of her book and the name of the film and book by TBN sound almost alike!

"Jimmy Swaggart was sued in June 2001 for allegedly plagiarizing various sections of religious publications by the late Rev. Finis Dake."

http://cultlink.com/plagiarism/plgchart.htm

Is Swaggart a bastion of morals and ethics?

Kenneth Hagin's name is also on that list.

It does seem that plagiarism might be rampant among "religious leaders."
 
Upvote 0

ProAmerican

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,250
58
55
✟1,696.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
godson777 said:
All I know is that Hagin was A MAN OF GOD!

We can compare the veracity of that claim with scripture: "By their fruits shall ye know them."

godson777 said:
If he did copy something by Kenyon it wasn't to try to steal it, it was just to share the same awesome revelation with his readers.

If Hagin did copy word-for-word from Kenyon, it doesn't matter what his intent was. What matters is if he did or not, and if any law(s) were violated. Plagiarism is a crime as well as deceit. It carries with it penalties that can range up to and including jail time.

How would giving Kenyon credit diltute the awesomeness of these so-called revelations? It wouldn't.

Is stealing, stealing, good intent or not?

If Hagins intent was to "share" the awsesomeness of these revelations, he could have said so when all of this mess came to light. Instead, Hagin said:

Kenyon's influence on my ministry has been minute. Only his teaching's on the name of Jesus have much to do with my theology. I absolutely deny any metaphysical influences from Kenyon

Maybe Hagin did want to "share" them, just not with Kenyon.
 
Upvote 0

SriLanka4Jesus

New Member
May 31, 2006
4
2
✟22,634.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I wish to bring 2 issues into this debate. One based on my experience with working in a Charismatic type ministry and one on having read Kenneth Hagin's books.

I became a Christian 15 years ago and was very much in the world before that. I was a law student then. Today I am an attorney both in Sri Lanka and the US. I could therefore be considered someone who has given herself to worldly learning. This part of my life therefore was often a yardstick for comparison and analysis of the charismatic ministries I became associated with. I found their disregard for the intellectual or what some would call 'basic common sense' awkward. They suffer from a 'disease' many other minstries suffer from as well. They believe the spiritual truth they focus on is exhaustive and will solve all their problems and answer all their critics. There is often almost a desceration of anything to do with education and the intellect - viewed as humanistic, liberal and anti-God. A part of what they say could be justified but sadly such an attitude has encouraged their followers to view higher education with disdain. In this context, I found that the ministry I worked with which is comparable with the Kenneth Hagin Ministry though smaller, made some very silly mistakes. The head of the ministry may not be the source of all that is written under his name. Delegation of duties based on trust more than ability is often done. The recruitment process whereby positions in the ministry are filled would often be sloppy when compared to general workplace norms. You must also remember that you are dealing with for a large part a bunch of people who have probably passed just High School. If they have a one or two year Bible School qualification they maybe in the highest ranks of the organization.

The disclaimer that the ministry of Kenyon was only minor in Hagin's minstry therefore may have come from their communications department. Hagin may not have even known of it. These departments generally function as the 'more connected with the world' support for the man or woman who heads the ministry and who is less inclined to deal with the 'more mundane matters of the world'.If Kenneth Hagin himself said it, there is a strong possiblity that he understood what he said very differently from an outside assessment of his statement. Read on...

Kenneth Hagin himself, if you read his books wasn't a scholar. The language he uses etc. makes this amply clear. It is quite possible he did not know a thing about copyright law or the need to acknowledge his source. Many preachers like Hagin also believe the source of a God inspired message is God and their thinking is framed that way. The man who gave the message is a mere vessel for communication. Hence the lack of interest in 'glorifying' the vessel. The explanation on Kenyon's website amplifies this observation. Kenyon is not seen as treating the use of the message he preached or wrote as a 'violation of his rights'. He is portrayed as being pleased that the message he was called to preach is being preached through an additional channel in Kenneth Hagin.

The mind of the spirit is very different from the mind of the flesh. This is something that many Christians have no clue about. They analyze situations and events using the same standards and precepts that the world uses. The conclusions they hotly defend and use to maul the 'wrongdoer' often baffle the man or woman of God they are trying to defend or portray as the victim. In this case it is Kenyon. As he is no longer alive, those who are responsible for his ministry have expressed the bewilderment.

Kenneth Hagin also had a very strong emphasis on the need to walk in love - agape love. Though he is known for the faith message - the love message was his central focus. He dealt with his critics in the same way. From my understanding of his beliefs he may have chosen not to answer his critics at all - leaving the Lord to deal with them. Maintaining a mind free of worry, anxiety and judgement of others were prime factors. He relates how he literally put 1Corinthians 13 into practice. He quotes the amplified version which states that love thinks ill of no person. So even if a person was disliked and hated by many others he would find something good to say about that person. In the light of these facts, I find it difficult to charge Kenneth Hagin with the moral condemnation of being a plagiarist. It just doesn't sit well......

As a parting thought I wish to relate an experience that may seem very strange to many Americans but would illustrate an important truth. I was once attending a seminar in Sri Lanka conducted by a well known Professor of Law, who had a Ph.d from Oxford University in England. He was a Professor of Law at the University of Singapore. In the course of the seminar some comment was made about copyright laws and he explained that the Chinese people had a very different attitude towards copyright infringement. To them it was an honor to steal a book as it 'helped' spread knowledge. He had no regard for copyright laws himself and encouraged those at the seminar to photocopy his own publications which were very expensive if you chose to purchase them. This might help people in the US understand that there is a world out there where people think differently - it is possible! If this very educated man (who was a wonderful and sincere human being) had such an 'obnoxious' belief shouldn't we be a little more gracious to somone like Kenneth Hagin, who could have acted with much less knowledge?

To all the Hagin bashers - it might please you to know that when I was an educated pagan 1000s of miles away in Sri Lanka it was the ministry of Kenneth Hagin that helped me grow in Christ. I am within the most educated people in my nation. I was a professor of law in Sri Lanka (under the British system we are called Lecturers), had an MBA, was an attorney etc. and it was this man's ministry that impacted my life for Christ. I may not agree with everything he says but I saw the sincerity of his heart for Christ. The most important thing I learnt from him was what it meant to walk in the love of God. I thank God for his life and minstry.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.