- Oct 2, 2011
- 6,061
- 2,238
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I have edited the OP. Take another look. Feel free to follow up. Thanks
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have edited the OP. Take another look. Feel free to follow up. ThanksPersonally, I believe that it was actually the men that were there, not "just" a vision. I don't think that Jesus would speak to a vision/holographic image.
Presumptions about the vision are not warranted nor supported by The Creator, Jesus, nor by Scripture.We don't know much, but we presume a lot.
There were two Enoch's, one was the son of Cain & the other was the son of Jared. This leaves us with two bloodlines.
He may well be one of the 2 witnesses, while some say Moses will be with Elijah. Parts of Enoch are inspired,
That's an interesting rewording, truly. I appreciate your attention to detail, as always. I feel closer to understanding why folks, like yourself, believe the way you do! But I can't say that I'm swayed by it, lol.I have edited the OP. Take another look. Feel free to follow up. Thanks
Can you quote my words?I wonder what exactly do you mean by "representatives"?
So do II still believe that they were the "real deal"
Can you quote my words?
I figured that "representations" would be synonymous with "they were representatives" of the real deal... perhaps too much liberty?They were real in that they were real representations (vision) of them; i.e., had God resurrected them, that would have been their real behaviors.
They were real and exact representations.I figured that "representations" would be synonymous with "they were representatives" of the real deal... perhaps too much liberty?
As I woke up this morning, this chat of ours was on my mind and I felt closer, somehow, to understanding your point of view.They were real and exact representations.
Good question.Help me to understand something though... in using the term representations, isn't that also implying that it wasn't actually them?
with respect to a certain way, it could be real.the act of presenting somebody/something in a particular way
The Son is the exact representation but he sits at the right hand of the Father. In one sense, the Son is identified with the Father; in another, he is not.3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?