- Sep 7, 2009
- 44,343
- 3,067
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Republican
Nothing personal,it just reminds me of cliques in high school,had there own little expressions.
Are all the bibles wrong?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is your POV, a clique is an exclusive club, it is not exclusive at all to call him by his correct G-d Given, did you see that, G-D GIVEN name. No one said you can't call him that. Those who translated the books from their original decided this for you. I didn't let them decide it for me.
In many bibles, the name, THE NAME, or HaShem which also means, THE NAME, the HOLY name of G-d is rendered. L-RD. That is why you will read in some places.
I AM the L-RD your G-d.
They did not use the translation, some use Jehovah which is totally wrong in many ways, others did respect it and put it in Capital letters as L-RD. But using an 'o' in there. Because of todays casualness and forms of writing, I think it best to separate it even further to show the Holiness of it. That is my prerogative and I am not telling anyone else to do it so why do you have a problem with it? You and many others here like to use your own shorthand for things you think are worthy of making fun of and use things like
sab, ULB, Uncle Moses, Judaizers, and other things that show disrespect. That is something to be called on. I am showing due respect to my G-d and that is no reason for a Christian to call me on it unless they don't have any respect for G-d.
You probably don't like it because it does have to do with a commandment, which many of you say are done away with and want that to be true and are pricked in the heart by anyone else that does follow them and doesn't believe they are done away with.
There was a death penalty for this too so it must have been a big deal to G-d, just like breaking the Sabbath by carrying wood, something that could have been done the other 6 days in the week.
No, I don't believe that this is 'done away with', He says he will not hold him guiltless, and I believe him.
If you want to be least in the kingdom of G-d that is most certainly your choice, your decision, and your right to choose, and also your lot for eternity. But you have been warned.
The death penalty was enacted during those days of the wandering. It was in this past weeks Torah portion:
This is what happens when you mix Jew and gentile, but the gentile is not free from this law either.
You say potAtoe...I say potAHtoeNothing personal,it just reminds me of cliques in high school,had there own little expressions.
Are all the bibles wrong?
If I upset Him I deserved to be whipped.
The day will come when Jesus Christ will condemn countless hosts to the eternal fires and punishments of hell.
I just cant imagine Jesus whipping or stoning someone.
Yet,we see his own laws said to do it.
Try to imagine a man held on the ground,and Jesus draws back that whip,and begins snapping the whip 39 times,shredding a mans back open.
I cetainly can't.Maybe others can.
Can anyone imagine Jesus saying this?
Deuteronomy 25:1 If there is a dispute between men and they come into court and the judges decide between them, acquitting the innocent and condemning the guilty, 2 then if the guilty man deserves to be beaten, the judge shall cause him to lie down and be beaten in his presence with a number of stripes in proportion to his offense. 3 Forty stripes may be given him, but not more, lest, if one should go on to beat him with more stripes than these, your brother be degraded in your sight.
Not only that,but why is the guy degraded,after 40?
Like 38 stripes would not be degrading?
Would you deserve to be whipped by Him?
Luke 12:48 The one yet no knowing doing yet worthy of blows/plhgwn <4127> shall be being smitten few. To every yet to whom was given much shall be being sought beside of him and to whom they-committed much more exceedingly they shall be asking him.
Reve 15:1 And I perceived another sign in the heaven, great and marvelous. Messengers, seven, having blows/stripes/plhgaV <4127>, seven, the last, that in them is finished the fury of the God.
If I am not mistaken, it seems like the OC Hebrew Israelites went thru the first 3 plagues in Exodus.You posted itI was looking for your other one you posted and I caught this one. I didnt see this one.
Paul received the stripes of the children OF MEN too huh?I like how he minused off the top there too concerning the degrading part
Sometimes it shows (like in the parable of THE FORGIVEN servant WHICH BECAME the WICKED servant for beating his fellowservants) that he simply hands them over to the tormentors
Mat 18:18 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
(This all because he showed no mercy towards another).
Judgment without mercy is shown to those who show no mercy (as in the parable)
Sounds similiar to the Lord
Isaiah 51:43 But I will put it into the hand of them that afflict thee; which have said to thy soul, Bow down, that we may go over: and thou hast laid thy body as the ground, and as the street, to them that went over.
Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
Acts 8:33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?