Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
LOL... That's just it... Mine will usually only tell me that I should have considered what I was going to do first...Mine works just fine beforehand as long as I am considering what I am doing.
LOL... That's just it... Mine will usually only tell me that I should have considered what I was going to do first...
Oh well... I may have a late conscience, but at least I now have the Holy Spirit to take over the beforehand stuff.
im asking this question because there are many who believe that Adam is a dirty dog. Here is my reasoning to why they are not and were following the plan of God. Adam and Eve were placed in the garden of Eden. They were innocent of knowledge of good and evil. Satan was allowed to tempt them and Eve partook of the fruit and gave it to Adam. I believe that Adam and Eve disobeyed Gods law to not eat the fruit. God had told them not to eat of the fruit or they would die. Since there had not yet had death enter into the garden did they understand what the consequences of their choice? Since they did not know good and evil, could Adam and Eve understood what the law was and the consequences? They did disobey and as a result death came into the world. Sin also came into the world because of imperfection. I believe that to justice it does not matter if someone disobeys having full knowledge and understanding of the law broken or if someone is innocent of the law. It is still disobedience and there are consequences that must come as a result. The punishment is the same. Logic dictates that this was Gods plan all along because why would he allow satan to tempt them? Why would God place the tree of knowledge of good and evil for them to be tempted. I believe that God wanted Adam to eat the fruit so mortality would come to this earth as well so we could know good from evil. To experience the opposites of life so we could continue to progress. So to me Adam and Eve did not sin. They did transgress Gods law which had the same punishment.
That's a problem... I find that it's hard to follow your conscience, because it always only kicks in after you've erred. I wish it would quite following me!
Hello! This caught my eye....Except that Yahweh was not the Father of Jesus. He was one of the Annunaki, too. He was the son of El and the brother of Baal.
http://www.bewaredeception.com/inde...he-sons-of-el-elyon&catid=1:articles&Itemid=3
Plainly, like Matthew 2 15? Which is neither a prophecy nor about Jesus. Or the phantom prophecy about being called the Nazarene which does not exist. We could go on. I challenge you to put your belief aside and find messiah based on the Tanakh alone. Then, you can come back and tell us what is or is not in our Scripture.
Plainly, like Matthew 2 15? Which is neither a prophecy nor about Jesus. Or the phantom prophecy about being called the Nazarene which does not exist. We could go on. I challenge you to put your belief aside and find messiah based on the Tanakh alone. Then, you can come back and tell us what is or is not in our Scripture.
Man, if we Jews are right imagine the egg that's going to be on your face.You are willfully blind. Its the same tired excuse trotted out by Jewish people today.. a lame attempt to discredit the gospels... come up with a better act bud.
I scanned your list. Life's too short to go through it. Most of it is out of context rubbish, non prophecies, etc. Like the example I've given you from Matthew. It's not to discredit your text, it's to defend mine and the two thousand years old slur of Jewish blindness.You are willfully blind. Its the same tired excuse trotted out by Jewish people today.. a lame attempt to discredit the gospels... come up with a better act bud.
http://www.accordingtothescriptures.org/prophecy/353prophecies.html
here's over 300 of them... but I'm sure you whine about how they are "too vague" or whatever your excuse will be.
Better yet, how about not assigning things I never said....
Makes you look like a real tool...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/esp_sumer_annunaki07.htmFirst of all, thank you for reading my link. Yes, there is historicity but Genesis version is based on that Sumerian story. There were no such people as Adam and Eve. I will add the link about Enki and Enlil.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/esp_sumer_annunaki07.htm
They chose the right way?
Man, if we Jews are right imagine the egg that's going to be on your face.
Look, Christians love to point at us and say we're blind. But you are simply dismissing our reading of the text while accusing us of dismissing yours. The fact is that for most things I'm going to need to see a CLEAR prophecy in the text. Take the whole one about the serpent biting the heel and the man crushing the snake's head. You interpret it as Jesus even though taking the original text by itself, which is what Jews have, nobody could ever come to the conclusion that it meant what you guys say it means. That's the point. You're looking back with your answer already and trying to find places your answer fits. We're reading the text to come up with an answer and we don't find it in the places you point out.
You should change your affiliation to PAGAN.....First of all, thank you for reading my link. Yes, there is historicity but Genesis version is based on that Sumerian story. There were no such people as Adam and Eve. I will add the link about Enki and Enlil.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/esp_sumer_annunaki07.htm
Grape, apple whatever. You know it is not possible to see the difference between good and evil by eating a fruit.
Except that Yahweh was not the Father of Jesus. He was one of the Annunaki, too. He was the son of El and the brother of Baal.
http://www.bewaredeception.com/inde...he-sons-of-el-elyon&catid=1:articles&Itemid=3
http://www.the-truth-seekers.org/yahweh.htm
How can a story be true if it never happened? The story does not prove that humans are sinners. That is not how the Sumerian story, upon which Genesis is based, is meant to be interpreted. It is about Enki helping humans to rebel against Enlil.
However, people are intrinsically evil. The Sumerian story explains that is because the Annuanki genetically modified our genes. That makes sense because God could not have created us with evil.
You are willfully blind.
Its the same tired excuse trotted out by Jewish people today.. a lame attempt to discredit the gospels... come up with a better act bud.
http://www.accordingtothescriptures.org/prophecy/353prophecies.html
here's over 300 of them... but I'm sure you whine about how they are "too vague" or whatever your excuse will be.
You are blind. As I said AND YOU COMPLETELY IGNORED.... Isaiah 53 is about Mesiach.. yet you will try and tell us its about Israel...
face it you are hostile, blind and rebellious.
And you lived in that age to confirm this conclusion?First of all, thank you for reading my link. Yes, there is historicity but Genesis version is based on that Sumerian story. There were no such people as Adam and Eve. I will add the link about Enki and Enlil.
aAnd you lived in that age to confirm this conclusion?
You noticed the Gilgamesh story is mythological, includes fanciful accounts of multiple gods fighting each other. Its not accurate to say the boat was built in 7 days, nor that it rained for 7 days; that the gods feared water and ran from it (are they cats?). A boat built in 7 days but built as a cube, 200ft each side? Its folklore im sure of it.
By contrast the Genesis account of flood seems more plausible in as much as the boat's seaworthiness, the time to build it, materials used.
And you lived in that age to confirm this conclusion?
You noticed the Gilgamesh story is mythological, includes fanciful accounts of multiple gods fighting each other. Its not accurate to say the boat was built in 7 days, nor that it rained for 7 days; that the gods feared water and ran from it (are they cats?). A boat built in 7 days but built as a cube, 200ft each side? Its folklore im sure of it.
By contrast the Genesis account of flood seems more plausible in as much as the boat's seaworthiness, the time to build it, materials used.
I'm sorry, but anyone who tries to argue that Enlil is Allah who tried to wipe away the knowledge of DNA coding has lost me right then and there. The Adam and Eve story as it stands has more credibility than that!
Hello! This caught my eye.
How could the Israelites have considered YHWH to be one of the seventy sons of El if they didn't believe that they were one of the seventy nations?
Then again, this is getting off-topic. If you start a thread about it I'll participate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?