Definition of micro/macro evolution:

[Vance]

Micro-evolution: evolution for which the evidence is so
overwhelming that even the ICR can't deny it.

Macro-evolution: evolution which is only proven beyond
reasonable doubt, not beyond unreasonable doubt.

[borrowed with permission from a person's sig line]

 

[revolutio]

Micro-evolution: Minor blasphemy.

Macro-evolution: Outright heresy.

 

[wblastyn]

Spherical earth: Minor blasphemy.

Heliocentricism: Outright heresy.

 

[Jet Black]

macroevolution: microevolution on red bull.

 

[mikelaughs]

microevolution: adaptation
macroevolution: pipe dreams

 

[Arikay]

LoL Mike your right.

Creationist version of micro evolution = Almost the theory of evolution.

Creationist version of Macro evolution = a pretend thing we made up and wont define so that we can pretend we dont believe in the theory of evolution, but really do.

 

[mikelaughs]

microevolution=you broke the cycle of two liners
macroevolution=a pretend thing someone made up

LoL Mike your right.

Creationist version of micro evolution = Almost the theory of evolution.

Creationist version of Macro evolution = a pretend thing we made up and wont define so that we can pretend we dont believe in the theory of evolution, but really do.

 

[Arikay]

Microevolution= it started as a 4 liner.

Creationist Macro evolution=something creationistists made up to keep from being wrong. (Unless of course, you would like to go back to that one thread not to long ago, and give us answers to the questions we asked but you never answered? )

microevolution=you broke the cycle of two liners
macroevolution=a pretend thing someone made up

 

[flyer]

microevolution=average with creationist

macroevolution=pretend

How can someone deny all evidence for science?

 

[Arikay]

I dont know?

Why is macro evolution pretend?

 

[mikelaughs]

Microevolution= it started as a 4 liner.

I'd love to go back to that. In fact, i already responded to no.1. My only request is to debate them one at a time. I'm not going to paste in here 200 evidences to support creation and expect anyone to answer. It doesn't serve any purpose and just clouds the water with a bunch of intangible claims

Creationist Macro evolution=something creationistists made up to keep from being wrong. (Unless of course, you would like to go back to that one thread not to long ago, and give us answers to the questions we asked but you never answered? )[/QUOTE]

 

[Arikay]

I would say, pick one of those evidence thingies and start a new thread about it.

I'd love to go back to that. In fact, i already responded to no.1. My only request is to debate them one at a time. I'm not going to paste in here 200 evidences to support creation and expect anyone to answer. It doesn't serve any purpose and just clouds the water with a bunch of intangible claims

Creationist Macro evolution=something creationistists made up to keep from being wrong. (Unless of course, you would like to go back to that one thread not to long ago, and give us answers to the questions we asked but you never answered? )

[/QUOTE]

 

[flyer]

I dont know?

Why is macro evolution pretend?

Macroevolution is not pretend. Creationists assume it is pretend. It is accepted beyond reasonabel doubt that theory is true.

 

[revolutio]

What's this? An evolution thread that has yet to degenerate into pointless bickering? A clear violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics!

 

[OldBadfish]

Allow me revolutio. I am Entropy Man!!

Actually I can believe that micro-evolution or adaptation is true, because of the changing conditions, climates, relocations, or whatever, I actually cannot deny that.

 

[Arikay]

Ah, ic, ok.

Macroevolution is not pretend. Creationists assume it is pretend. It is accepted beyond reasonabel doubt that theory is true.

 

[flyer]

Ah, ic, ok.

what does that mean?

 

[bevets]

micro: there is genetic variation -- How exciting! Who wouldve guessed that people are different? Unfortunately for evolutionists, mutations do not add information.

All change is not growth, as all movement is not forward. ~ Ellen Glasgow

This is a BIG problem for macro because information must be added somewhere for evolution to progress from goo to you.

The opposite truth has been affirmed by innumerable cases of measurable evolution at this minimal scale-but, to be visible at all over so short a span, evolution must be far too rapid (and transient) to serve as the basis for major transformations in geological time. Hence, the “paradox of the visibly irrelevant”-or, if you can see it at all, it’s too fast to matter in the long run. ~ Stephen Jay Gould

Evolution is an atheist fairy tale

 

[flyer]

Evolution is science, it is not atheism. Creations is not science, it is an religious believe.

 

[Cantuar]

Bevets has alerady been told that; he just apparently knows better than scientists do when it comes to scientific theories.

http://www.beliefnet.com/boards/message_list.asp?boardID=821&discussionID=252443