Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Here is a link showing some versions of essential doctrines claimed by various Christian groups, but it does not explain why each group selected those particular doctrines as essential.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chrcarddoc1.htm
I'm going to try this again. Thanks go to serious for helping phrase the OP so it will fit within the forum guidelines.
Many denominations use a statement of faith or some sort of creed to determine who is and who is not a Christian. One of the most common of these is the Nicene Creed, but it is far from the only one. While each aspect of the creed can be shown to have been drawn from an interpretation of a section of scripture, what seems to be missing is specific scriptural support for the concepts that are presented as an essential aspect of Christianity. Is there any scriptural support for a specific selection of core beliefs, or specific interpretations of these verses, which define what is necessary for salvation as opposed to simply ancillary beliefs which are left open for the individual and various denominations to interpret?
The Nicene Creed (with scriptural references)
We believe in (Romans 10:8-10; 1John 4:15)
ONE God, (Deuteronomy 6:4, Ephesians 4:6)
For me I think that the Westminster Standards is the finest system of doctrine that we've been able to produce so far. It does not detail a "bare minimum" requirement of belief for salvation. Rather it seeks to expound a system of doctrine that aligns with all the Bible has to say.
In terms of a "bare minimum" I would say that "Jesus is Lord" is probably sufficient so long as each one of those three words is properly understood.
Basically. So long as "confessing Jesus" means "confessing that Jesus (the historical one encountered in the NT who died for sins) is Lord (and we owe him allegiance)". If that confession is genuine then it'd be hard to say that the person was not a Christian.Would you say that "confessing Jesus" fits that bare minimum?
Basically. So long as "confessing Jesus" means "confessing that Jesus (the historical one encountered in the NT who died for sins) is Lord (and we owe him allegiance)". If that confession is genuine then it'd be hard to say that the person was not a Christian.
I'm not sure I understand the difference between a historical Jesus and whatever is the other option.
By historical Jesus I mean that real Jesus - the one who actually lived, whom we encounter in the NT, and who lives today in the presence of the Father. Another option would be a Jesus fashioned in our own image who has no foundation in Scripture.
Whatever the New Testament says about him.When I hear this it usually means, the Jesus as I (whomever is speaking) understand Him to be and not the way anyone else might understand Him. Since you bring up the "Historic Jesus" please provide the historical facts which would identify which beliefs are accurate and which are not.
This is a non-answer. I expect this sort of a response when real scriptural support is unavailable.
That is a non-answer.
What do you consider as concrete documentation. No one followed Jesus around and wrote down what he said. Can oral traditions be as accurate as actual words at the time it be said?Why is it a non-answer? Seems fairly specific to me. The New Testament is a very concrete set of documents that can easily be accessed and read. Furthermore this answer shows that I hold the NT to be historically accurate and am not coming from a critical and liberal position. What about this fails to answer your question?
There are plenty of Scriptures that help to define who a Christian is. The entire New Testament explains who is really saved and who isn't. If you really want to know who a Christian is then read the entire New Testament with a clear mind that isn't influenced by what other religions say about Jesus. Jesus said the the sheep hear His voice and they know Him. He also said that there are people who will say that they served Him, but he never knew them. Jesus knows His sheep, and they know Him. The Holy Spirit testifies to a person of their salvation, which is why we are to test the Spirits. We are to test anything that is taught about Jesus or God or the Holy Spirit that contradicts the Word of God. We aren't to listen to any prophet that teaches something that contradicts the Scriptures.
I'm going to try this again. Thanks go to serious for helping phrase the OP so it will fit within the forum guidelines.
Many denominations use a statement of faith or some sort of creed to determine who is and who is not a Christian. One of the most common of these is the Nicene Creed, but it is far from the only one. While each aspect of the creed can be shown to have been drawn from an interpretation of a section of scripture, what seems to be missing is specific scriptural support for the concepts that are presented as an essential aspect of Christianity. Is there any scriptural support for a specific selection of core beliefs, or specific interpretations of these verses, which define what is necessary for salvation as opposed to simply ancillary beliefs which are left open for the individual and various denominations to interpret?
There are plenty of Scriptures that help to define who a Christian is. The entire New Testament explains who is really saved and who isn't. If you really want to know who a Christian is then read the entire New Testament with a clear mind that isn't influenced by what other religions say about Jesus. Jesus said the the sheep hear His voice and they know Him. He also said that there are people who will say that they served Him, but he never knew them. Jesus knows His sheep, and they know Him. The Holy Spirit testifies to a person of their salvation, which is why we are to test the Spirits. We are to test anything that is taught about Jesus or God or the Holy Spirit that contradicts the Word of God. We aren't to listen to any prophet that teaches something that contradicts the Scriptures.
Why is it a non-answer? Seems fairly specific to me. The New Testament is a very concrete set of documents that can easily be accessed and read. Furthermore this answer shows that I hold the NT to be historically accurate and am not coming from a critical and liberal position. What about this fails to answer your question?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?