HummingbirdSong said:
How is it that you define "God?"
The Great and Wonderful Mystery, The Sun Source of All Love, The Giver of Life Beyond Life, and The Most Divine Sage of Sages. They are an entity of an energy (for lack of a better term) that exist within and without all things of this world, perhaps the universe, and of a form and substance well beyond our limited ability to comprehend.
HummingbirdSong said:
What attributes do you give to "God."
None. I believe it is improper to the point of sacrilege to ascribe specific attributes to the whole of the One Most Divine.
When one can truly marvel at the colors of the wind; be inspired by the harmony sung by the sunrise; be soothed by the melody played by the full moon; feel the electrical charge within water; rate the intelligence of the mountain; learn from the wisdom of the great oak; and feel the heartbeat from the earth itself, only then can one even began to fathom a single attribute of the Great Mystery.
HummingbirdSong said:
What is "God" responsible for or not responsible for?
There are two sides to the word "responsible."
If you mean 'duties,' the Most Divine has no duty to us, the world, or the universe. They simply exist in harmony with the physical laws of nature. We choose to commune and be a part of that Divine, or not, on our own accord.
If you mean 'causation,' The Great Mystery is responsible for the 'energy' (again, for lack of a better term) that creates an entire world of awareness and ability beyond, yet in harmony with, the realm of physical laws. It connects us to each other, as well as to the Divine, and to the whole of the universe. We can tap into that energy to learn, or use it to create a change in the world around us. I believe the Divine is responsible for providing mankind with certain inspirations and motivations for desiring growth toward a more advanced state of being. When mankind was still little more than animalistic, existing on pure instinct and nothing else, it was the Great mystery which provided the first question of existence which, to this day, still inspires mankind to learn and grow: "Is there not more?"
HummingbirdSong said:
Yes and no.

I see the Divine as being a single entity, yet also as a collective of entities. Thus, they are many, yet they are singular. I also believe that due to our limited ability to perceive and understand, it is necessary for us to focus on aspects of the Divine in order to begin understanding, rather than to try to understand all at once, and become overwhelmed. I cannot hold the entire ocean, but I can hold a bowl of water. If I commune with, and worship, the bowl of water, it is a reflection of my communion and worship of the ocean, not the bowl of water unto itself. If I choose, I can have several bowls of water, each for a slightly different reason. One for the smell, one for the taste, one to be hot, one to be cold, etc., all for the purpose of learning more about the nature of the ocean as a whole.
Universally,
-- Druweid