Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Lol, you cant prove it.
If he can make unfounded assertions that certain things wouldn't work on a flat earth with zero evidence, certainly I am well within my rights to to make the same claims about it already functioning on a flat earth with the same amount of evidence.
Thing is, science can and has proved the earth is a sphere
I am still waiting for working models, demonstrating the claims that go with a spinning ball of water.
Anyone can start with a globe covered with water rotating.
Then show how a moon 250,000 miles away, can change the unlit side, which is black in their made-up outer space, to blue as seen on earth during daylight hours.
Surely if the science boys can receive images from over 4 billion miles away. My request should be a walk in the park.
Evolution is totally different from things that we can 'actually' prove. Like a spherical earth. That is proven 100% by science, astronomy etc etc etc...
1. Evolution is no different than a spherical earth in a helicentric solar system. There is enormous evidence supporting both.
I am still waiting for working models, demonstrating the claims that go with a spinning ball of water.
Anyone can start with a globe covered with water rotating.
Then show how a moon 250,000 miles away, can change the unlit side, which is black in their made-up outer space, to blue as seen on earth during daylight hours.
I wonder to whom you should send your requests ...Surely if the science boys can receive images from over 4 billion miles away. My request should be a walk in the park.
If you feel the math is wrong by those you've seen, that's fine. There is work available out there by people with PhD's in Physics and degrees in engineering who demonstrate issues in the global math and put forward their own mathematical proofs for flat earth.
You want photographic evidence. Ok the ISS is stated to be going around the earth at 250 miles above the earth.
To be fair, the latter two are a lot easier to demonstrate.
You were the one who claimed that there was verifiable PhD level scientific evidence for the Flat Earth.If he can make unfounded assertions that certain things wouldn't work on a flat earth with zero evidence, certainly I am well within my rights to to make the same claims about it already functioning on a flat earth with the same amount of evidence.
No they are not, its just they prove your so beloved science is lying. so you reject the evidence.
You can not even see a sun, moon and stars that is local to to earth. so why would i expect you to be able to see the distance from the earth in these two photos show the same distance or just a mile or two in difference.
Quit wasting my time with your poor perception of distances.
Well, it's "space". And everybody knows that "sun" and "moon" are in "space". As are "stars". And "galaxies".Oh my. Someone must not understand that Felix Baumgardner made his jump during the day. That meant the capsule was in daylight. One cannot see stars in daylight. I have no idea what position the sun and moon were relative to the capsule and camera, but if you think that they should both appear in the same section of sky visible in the photos then you really are in over your head on this subject.
Anyone can start with a globe covered with water rotating.
Then show how a moon 250,000 miles away, can change the unlit side, which is black in their made-up outer space, to blue as seen on earth during daylight hours.
But don't you think to yourself, "why now?" Kind of convenient it's all happening when belief in a ball-Earth is collapsing, huh?
Maybe hire some more crisis actors and pay some millionaire-passenger actors to pretend they've been in space, and it'll all blow over - crisis averted?
I mean, you can't believe half of these millionaire puppets they throw in our faces got there by legitimate means. Look at Suckerberg. If that dude were the real deal, rather than someone paid to stooge for the CIA, we'd all be rich - even the odd Hamster.
It's really depressing that it has come to that point.Seriously, if you think that the "dark" side of the moon is actually dark, or in your words "black", then it's time for you to go back to basics. Or school. Or both.
If that's what you are working from then the rest of your drivel is understandable. Sad, but understandable.
I do hope you are a troll, as it would be really awful to be you if it were for real.
Satellites is a real give away. They don't existWell, it's "space". And everybody knows that "sun" and "moon" are in "space". As are "stars". And "galaxies".
So every image from "space" must include sun, moon, stars, a couple of satellites zipping by and three or more spiral galaxies in the background. If it doesn't, it is obviously "fake".
He asked for proof of water sticking to a ball, not unfounded, unproven theories. We're aware of what is claimed for magic gravity - what we lack is actual proof of the magic.It is, but you're just going to dismiss it.
Try this anyway:
Gravity - Wikipedia
Atmospheric optics - Wikipedia
I'm glad it amuses you to read it as much as it amuses me to write it.LOL! This overblown rhetoric is almost as funny as some of the claims about Flerf.
Not at all. Just calling out what colour bunny the magician is going to pull out of the hat next. Easily refutable by picking someone new from the audience, rather than one of the stooges he planted earlier. Science is testable and repeatable, remember? A magician's tricks must be done in secrecy, with only a select few volunteers (e.g. millionaire/billionaire crisis-actor types - Richard Branson, anyone?And here we have the tin foil defense. As long as flat earthers can appeal to a conspiracy, no amount of actual evidence will ever convince them.
I don't need to convince myself, and I won't convince the willfully ignorant. Just regard my posts as a pre-emptive "I told you so", for the day some of our globalist readers finally realise the truth.Try actually presenting some evidence for Flerf instead of rambling gibberish like this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?