Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Death Penalty for Abortion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CurtisNeeley" data-source="post: 68555497" data-attributes="member: 285006"><p>Nope, Perhaps you did not quite understand the "intentional" part. I will try to make the necessary intention aspect clearer.</p><p></p><p>Live unborn humans normally have their own livers and do not need the liver of the host female to do anything besides keep the host female healthy. Live unborn humans do not consume anything like alcohol.</p><p></p><p>You misunderstand autonomy or assert non-congruent arguments as similar and true. Is this to mislead weaker minds the public is perhaps filled with? SCOTUS does not have a Justice with a weak enough mind for any to risk presenting such a bogus claim.</p><p></p><p>Whatever harm the live unborn human does to the host female is done involuntarily and with no intention to harm because the host female chose to risk becoming a host. This does not "<em>boil down</em>" neatly into a sound bite. The live unborn human begins life as a "parasite" inside a host female who forced the live unborn human to live within.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CurtisNeeley, post: 68555497, member: 285006"] Nope, Perhaps you did not quite understand the "intentional" part. I will try to make the necessary intention aspect clearer. Live unborn humans normally have their own livers and do not need the liver of the host female to do anything besides keep the host female healthy. Live unborn humans do not consume anything like alcohol. You misunderstand autonomy or assert non-congruent arguments as similar and true. Is this to mislead weaker minds the public is perhaps filled with? SCOTUS does not have a Justice with a weak enough mind for any to risk presenting such a bogus claim. Whatever harm the live unborn human does to the host female is done involuntarily and with no intention to harm because the host female chose to risk becoming a host. This does not "[I]boil down[/I]" neatly into a sound bite. The live unborn human begins life as a "parasite" inside a host female who forced the live unborn human to live within. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Death Penalty for Abortion
Top
Bottom