So you advocate marrying someone you're not attracted to.
What does that have to do with anything? You can be attracted to someone without having sex with them!
I don't understand how believing the very basic word of the Bible makes one a "fundamentalist." I believe the more accurate word would be "Christian." Especially when it comes to the words of Christ! If one cannot believe what is quoted as the words that Jesus Himself spoke in the Bible, what foundation do they have to build a life upon as a Christian?
There is NO way to interpret the Bible as to saying that casual sex is okay. The OP is in a long-term relationship that is sexual with someone that she is not married to, not sure if she wants to marry him, AND desiring sex with other men. The Bible is very clear on what the problem is here.
We're not referring the proper length of a woman's hair or any other gray area that can be considered debatable. This is very basic Bible, a very clean cut area of the Law that is not open to interpretation. The only way to get out of this one is to go down a VERY slippery slope... picking and choosing what we follow in the Bible so that we don't have to change ourselves or repent our sins. We are called to suppress the desires of our flesh and be obedient to the kind, loving, forgiving Father, our God, who knows what is best for us much better than we do.
It has nothing to do with marrying someone you aren't attracted to. I am very attracted to my husband and certainly wouldn't have married him if I found him repulsive. Unless you are saying that all Christian men are unattractive and repulsive, which, if you truly feel that way, I would suggest a little travel, as anywhere I've been, Christians are as diverse in appearance as the non-believing population.
Upvote
0