Well.....**Snicker**...always love it when atheists and other God-deniers preach to me about how a Christian should behave...
Why, if you don't believe in God, do you care if anyone says you are going to hell? (not that telling people they are going to hell is a great way to promote christianity or anything)
For me "moral" is a social term, not a christian one... it's dictated by action not by belief. I don't know that being athiest is a reason to call someone immoral. And, as for evil, that's a judgement call, and I'm not one to say whether someone is evil or good... their actions, yes, them personally, no.
3. Atheism is evil, amoral, and will certainly damn you to Hell. A little poetic justice is none of the above. I certainly don't think he deserves any special treatment or any special arrangements made because of his crime - do you?
Atheism is simultaneously morally objectionable (evil) and [SIZE=-1]lacking any moral characteristics[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] (amoral)?3. Atheism is evil, amoral, and will certainly damn you to Hell.
It's probably sexist or non-pc of me to say this but I would always question an 18 year old male daycare worker. Not that they aren't capable or trustworthy (my own 17 yr old is great with kids but doesn't like them enough to make a job out of it) I just feel it's an uncommon thing and would probably want to be extra cautious when entrusting my toddlers to his care.
Just wondering - I'm not trying to start a flame war or anything.agree with this...
That's something you will have to work out with the mother of your children. If you do become a stay at home dad there would be no problem introducing yourself as such but since you also mention you have a job of some kind I wonder why you wouldn't want to mention that too.Just wondering - I'm not trying to start a flame war or anything.
I've always wanted to be a stay-at-home dad, and my career is flexible enough that this might be possible in the future.
Would you think suspiciously of me if I introduced myself as one? If not, what's the inherent difference between a stay-at-home dad and a man who take care of children in a day-care center?
Just wondering - I'm not trying to start a flame war or anything.
I've always wanted to be a stay-at-home dad, and my career is flexible enough that this might be possible in the future.
Would you think suspiciously of me if I introduced myself as one? If not, what's the inherent difference between a stay-at-home dad and a man who take care of children in a day-care center?
I believe in the death penalty for rapist and child molesters, they are the worst among us and they can't be rehabilitated by any means.
Please dont, I beg of you ANYTHING but daycare. I worked at one and it convinced me NEVER EVER EVER EVER to send my kids there.Despicable. It definitely makes me reconsider sending my future children to daycare..
Yeah, because THATS not sexist at all.I don't think Flicka said that an 18 year old male couldn't work in a daycare, or even shouldn't. Rather that he would be scrutinized very closely. I would have to hear directly from God on the matter if I were hiring. Also the age is of utmost importance here. 18 is an age where males by and large have a sex drive that can drive them crazy. Hence American Pie. I may not have quite as much suspicion with an older male, and I also think there should be a rule about not being alone with one person kind of thing.
It is a little sexist and I said so from the beginning. But that's just too bad. When it comes to their kids people have a right to be a little paranoid.Please dont, I beg of you ANYTHING but daycare. I worked at one and it convinced me NEVER EVER EVER EVER to send my kids there.
Yeah, because THATS not sexist at all.
This kind of stuff really burns my toast, ya know? I was 18 and working at a daycare and I managed to control myself just dandy. I was even single at that time, so DONT be pointing fingers at people who've done NOTHING wrong because ONE person decided to screw up. The vast majority of young men working with children manage to control their hormonal little selves.
But to say that ALL 18 year old boys who watch children should be treated with suspicion I think is ridiculous and very sexist.It is a little sexist and I said so from the beginning. But that's just too bad. When it comes to their kids people have a right to be a little paranoid.
If it were an 18 year old boy who had an interest in teaching or early childhood development and was pursuing an education in those areas I would think differently about them than someone just taking the job because it was available. And it would be a mistake to not acknowledge that some people put themselves in positions to be around children for nefarious reasons. And while it can be true of an 18 year old girl as well it's less common for a boy to enter the child care field . All that adds up to proceeding with caution. You don't have to like it, but you can and should expect it.
I agree. Legislation of morals based on religious conviction is totally out of line. No one is justified in saying "this is wrong because _______(insert deity) says so and now YOU have to follow this rule too".Oh please. That's not what worries me, I hate when people try to legislate their religion and force their morals, laws and lifestyles upon me.
Atheists are called immoral on this message board every day.
I agree. Legislation of morals based on religious conviction is totally out of line. No one is justified in saying "this is wrong because _______(insert deity) says so and now YOU have to follow this rule too".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?