I totally disagree. A prediction is not after all the fact are in then assume evolution did it.
That's not how scientific predictions work dude.
In science, you build models (hypothesis / theories) on how stuff works.
Those models make predictions about what other data you should be able to find. It doesn't matter if that other data is already known or not.
It's not a "prediction" in the sense of "the future".
It's rather "if this and this is true, then that".
that being the prediction.
Also, even assuming your concept, it's still valid. Not all genomes of all creatures are mapped. All creatures aren't even known, we continue to find species regurarly that were unkown till the find.
All those genomes that aren't mapped yet and those still unkown creatures are predicted to fall into a nested hierarchy by evolution theory.
What mechanism are you referring to mutation plus selection?
Evolution as a whole. The grand theory. Since you are arguing against it, I'll go ahead and assume that you know what that means. I'm pretty sure that it's naive of me to do that though.
That's a total failure since in the recent decade they have learned about layer on top of layer of information and overlapping code which mean beneficial mutation not only extremely rare but unlikely to become fixed in a population. I know it may be a surprise but Neo-Darwinism is completely bankrupt.
So who received the Nobel prize for refuting evolution theory and why wasn't the entire scientific world (and beyond) not informed about that earth-shattering news?
All Neo-Darwinism predictions are made after the facts are in yet has tons of failed predictions which they call co-evolution.
You have an extremely warped view of how science is done.
It also strikes me how badly you deal with language...
We all know that words can mean different things in different contexts.
For example:
"this brick is light, not heavy".
"coca cola light"
"it's a bride light"
See?
Here's another example:
"Another TV pastor predicts the end of the world"
"This models predicts nested hierarchies in life"
The first is refering to telling the future.
The second is stating how a model can be tested and falsified.