justlookinla
Regular Member
That's the guesses and supposition of 'science', isn't it?
And...what other than only naturalistic mechanisms would create a human and a pine tree from this alleged common life from of long long ago?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
But that is only your guess...or is it a supposition??
The theory of evolution doesn't say that it is ONLY naturalistic mechanisms so your supposition doesn't apply to the theory. Try again.
Could be...can you show us a scientific paper whose conclusions say that?That's the guesses and supposition of 'science', isn't it?
I cannot offer guesses and suppositions regarding mechanisms that science cannot study. Sorry.And...what other than only naturalistic mechanisms would create a human and a pine tree from this alleged common life from of long long ago?
Could be...can you show us a scientific paper whose conclusions say that?
I cannot offer guesses and suppositions regarding mechanisms that science cannot study. Sorry.
Plan on producing some scientific paper that concludes "...only naturalistic mechanisms..." cause evolution?
I don't consider it evasion to request you provide support for your accusation, especially since you use it as part of your request for evidence.Just another evasion post in a long line of evasion posts.
I don't consider it evasion to request you provide support for your accusation, especially since you use it as part of your request for evidence.
I consider it evasion that, in response to a request for evidence, you ask a question that contains the presumption for which the evidence was requested.
However, we are used to your tactics and I am merely trying to showcase your duplicity.
I don't consider it evasion to request you provide support for your accusation, especially since you use it as part of your request for evidence.
I consider it evasion that, in response to a request for evidence, you ask a question that contains the presumption for which the evidence was requested.
However, we are used to your tactics and I am merely trying to showcase your duplicity.
Don't worry, it is there for all to see.
When you find any evidence to support your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools, let me know.When you find the only driving force behind Darwinism, let me know.
When you find any evidence to support your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools, let me know.
You mean like, descent with modification by means of non-random sexual and natural selection?
Until then we'll continue to wait for you to find any evidence supporting your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools.Until then, we'll continue to search for the elusive driving force for Darwinism.
Until then we'll continue to wait for you to find any evidence supporting your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools.
You didn't see HitchSlap's post?It'll be a great day when the driving force for Darwinism is found though.
That was solved 155 years ago.
You should keep looking though.
Some are slow on the uptake, for various reasons.
But that is only your guess...or is it a supposition??
The theory of evolution doesn't say that it is ONLY naturalistic mechanisms so your supposition doesn't apply to the theory. Try again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?