"Biology" isn't a religion, but evolution fundamentalist belief in Darwinism qualifies as one and will in time.Originally posted by chickenman
so they start calling biology a religion
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider
That's why they should remove Darwinism from public schools.
Originally posted by chickenman
biology and evolution are intricately linked.
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider
"Biology" isn't a religion, but evolution fundamentalist belief in Darwinism qualifies as one and will in time.
No, it's an organized grass roots effort to debunk an atheistic faith being taught as science and the swindlers that promote it.Originally posted by Jerry Smith
It is the organized grass roots attack on science
Originally posted by npetreley
I'll do better than that! I'll give you the evidence the evolution way.
Fossil evidence of the tooth fairy.
Artist's conception of the tooth fairy, based on the above fossil.
There you have it. Irrefutable proof of the tooth fairy.
Admittedly, people have tried to discredit this conclusion by claiming this is actually the correct tooth for Lucy, not the tooth fairy.
But we educated scientists know for a fact that, at the very least, the tooth fairy and this tooth share common ancestry. Both of these pictures share certain traits, like colors, and the characters in the URL have similar patterns or exact replicas, such as "http."
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider
No, it's an organized grass roots effort to debunk an atheistic faith being taught as science and the swindlers that promote it.
The fundamentalist Darwinian evolutionists have been attacking the integrity of science for years by indoctrinating children with the belief that their ancestors include a species of fish, amphibian, reptile, rodent, and primate--in that order--with several funky transitional forms inbetween each stage.
That's not science. That's Darwinian faith.
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider
Yep. That's the logic of a typical Darwinian evolutionist fundamentalist alright.
I recall the words of a French scientist, "evolution is a fairy tale for adults."
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
For starters, "atheistic faith" is an oxymoron.
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
How is using evidence to produce well supported theories an attack on the integrity of science?
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Yeap that is a typical Creationist argument: high on rhetoric and emotion, low on accuracy and facts.
People just practice the rotten fruit resulting from the belief system. The Nazis practiced its fruits. So did the Communists. So do the folks at the "Natural Law"-based World Church of the Creator.Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Evolution fundamentalist might be a religon, but I know of no one who practices it, even among evolutionists.
Only in the mind of the evolution fundamentalists and their wacky assumptions. Consider the belief that reptiles change into mammals, fish with fins into amphibians with legs, land mammals with legs into whales with flippers, and you have a bizarre faith system.
Evolution is part of biology and is so well supported that no more belief is required in it as is required by gravity or a round earth.
The World Church of the Creator is off to a start. There's a whole pandora's box of evil that is opened with Darwinist interpretations of "Natural Law."
Now if you still want to incist that evolution is a religion, please describe its rituals, beliefs, holy texts, holidays, hierachy, preisthood, history, various sects, etc.
Jean Rostand, the fellow who said, "Transformism [evolution] is a fairy tale for adults,"
also wrote that "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses [questions - ED.] the fact of evolution." (L'Evolution des Especes [i.e., The Evolution of the Species], Hachette, p. 190).
Jean Rostand was also an atheist who would have viewed the Biblical account of creation as a "fairy tale for adults."
It wasn't an argument, though the creationist arguments are far more convincing and rational.Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Yeap that is a typical Creationist argument: high on rhetoric and emotion, low on accuracy and facts.
People just practice the rotten fruit resulting from the belief system. The Nazis practiced its fruits. So did the Communists. So do the folks at the "Natural Law"-based World Church of the Creator.
That's a faith. Not part of biology. Biology should deal with science, not faith.
You're a liar, but that "goes with the territory", right? I provided evidence on one count and agreed with a superb analogy involving evolutionists finding a tooth and declaring the tooth fairy to be real!Originally posted by chickenman
it's merely a string of unsupported claims with no evidence to back them up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?