Your doosey indicates you are not very good at arithmetic.
The last major magnetic field reversal was the Laschamp excursion which occurred around 42,000 years ago.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your doosey indicates you are not very good at arithmetic.Every once in awhile, I slip a doosey in!
Like this one, about the earth changing poles:
It was a joke.An event 42,000 years ago does not equate to it occurring in 58 AD.
Trouble is no one can tell from your serious Biblical references to topics which invariably are just as irrelevant.It was a joke.
So if I said Jesus walked on water, no one would bat an eye; but if I said God took the Flood waters off the earth, much like He did in Genesis 1, that would raise eyebrows ... right?Trouble is no one can tell from your serious Biblical references to topics which invariably are just as irrelevant.
Wrong. And you can see it too.However in the 150 years since Darwin first presented his ideas, no one has observed a favorable mutation in a plant or animal. Mutations do occur such as with cancer and tumors. However, for a favorable mutation one would need millions of coincidental changes to all take place at the same time and in a reproductive cell so that those changes could be passed on.
I could tell that AV was just messing around. So there's at least one person.Trouble is no one can tell from your serious Biblical references to topics which invariably are just as irrelevant.
Why not stick to an example you quoted in this thread.So if I said Jesus walked on water, no one would bat an eye; but if I said God took the Flood waters off the earth, much like He did in Genesis 1, that would raise eyebrows ... right?
What makes this serious and Nero blaming Christians for a magnetic reversal in 58 AD a joke when both could have been constructed by a random sentence generator?I even believe the fallen angels experimented with it (evolution) in Genesis 6.
It finally hit a brick wall in the mid nineteenth century though and stalled.
Well, the network that makes us human for example, would take a lot more than random genetic mutations, to get from primate to man. Any significant change in body structure or brain structure would require the reprogramming of the whole system. It's not as simple as changing a few letters or numbers. Each cell has millions of actively operating RNA and protein molecules. Layer upon layer of information more complex than any computer we can come up with. To believe they somehow came about by trial and error is absurd.
Add that to the fact that there are very rarely truly beneficial mutations.
Except that "genetic information" as used by Creationists is a meaningless term.That's simple adaptation. Not new genetic information.
Perhaps you should pray for discernment?What makes this serious and Nero blaming Christians for a magnetic reversal in 58 AD a joke when both could have been constructed by a random sentence generator?
You continue to regurgitate creationist apologetics. Genetic entropy and genetic information by Carter and Sanford are ill defined and they do not appear interested in engaging with their critics.That's simple adaptation. Not new genetic information.
Even some Christians have doubts about the miracles of the Gospels. But Jesus walking on water is a minor miracle. God hiding the flood would take endless miracles. It means that God had to plant false evidence, that is a form of lying. Most Christians do not believe that God can lie. That is probably why most Christians do not seem to believe that story.So if I said Jesus walked on water, no one would bat an eye; but if I said God took the Flood waters off the earth, much like He did in Genesis 1, that would raise eyebrows ... right?
You should read Sanford and Carter. Basically they are claiming that genetic information is front loaded and over time the accumulation of slightly delirious mutations will outperform any beneficial mutations leading to extinction. Their math is not realistic.Well, the network that makes us human for example, would take a lot more than random genetic mutations, to get from primate to man. Any significant change in body structure or brain structure would require the reprogramming of the whole system. It's not as simple as changing a few letters or numbers. Each cell has millions of actively operating RNA and protein molecules. Layer upon layer of information more complex than any computer we can come up with. To believe they somehow came about by trial and error is absurd.
Add that to the fact that there are very rarely truly beneficial mutations.
Well, that'll insure you won't grow in discernment, won't it?
I can understand why they wouldn't believe it, if they thought like you do.Even some Christians have doubts about the miracles of the Gospels. But Jesus walking on water is a minor miracle. God hiding the flood would take endless miracles. It means that God had to plant false evidence, that is a form of lying. Most Christians do not believe that God can lie. That is probably why most Christians do not seem to believe that story.
Well they are genetic scientists, are you?You should read Sanford and Carter. Basically they are claiming that genetic information is front loaded and over time the accumulation of slightly delirious mutations will outperform any beneficial mutations leading to extinction. Their math is not realistic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?