Darwin doubted his own theory as stated on page 280 of On the Origins of Species Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology surely does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. (note that the origin of this quote is page 226 of the Baker Encyclopedia of Apologetics)
The THEORY of evolution is based on imaginative speculation. The evolutionists do not have tangible evidence to back up their fancy ideas.
Consider the pictures of a fish, then an amphibian, then a reptile and then a mammal. They put arrow between these and state their theory like it was a PROVEN fact. There is no evidence for any form of life that is part way between fish and amphibian. There are zero missing links alive today or in the fossil record. These huge jumps are just a popular GUESS. The guess is based on their REASONING and WISHFUL thinking.
Where are the millions of fossils that are the evidence of thousands of times all over the globe that mutations were BETWEEN the previous and next kind? Where are thousands of dead end evolutionary trails that did not make the macro jump?
The textbooks and magazine articles have PAINTINGS that SEEM realistic. When I was a child the ARTISTS painted the dinosaurs very dull gray and green colors. In recent years the ARTISTS have been adding all kinds of vivid colors. I doubt that there is hard evidence for colorful or dull colored dinosaurs. I suggest that most of the popular concepts of evolution are not rooted in solid scientific evidence.
The THEORY of evolution is based on imaginative speculation. The evolutionists do not have tangible evidence to back up their fancy ideas.
Consider the pictures of a fish, then an amphibian, then a reptile and then a mammal. They put arrow between these and state their theory like it was a PROVEN fact. There is no evidence for any form of life that is part way between fish and amphibian. There are zero missing links alive today or in the fossil record. These huge jumps are just a popular GUESS. The guess is based on their REASONING and WISHFUL thinking.
Where are the millions of fossils that are the evidence of thousands of times all over the globe that mutations were BETWEEN the previous and next kind? Where are thousands of dead end evolutionary trails that did not make the macro jump?
The textbooks and magazine articles have PAINTINGS that SEEM realistic. When I was a child the ARTISTS painted the dinosaurs very dull gray and green colors. In recent years the ARTISTS have been adding all kinds of vivid colors. I doubt that there is hard evidence for colorful or dull colored dinosaurs. I suggest that most of the popular concepts of evolution are not rooted in solid scientific evidence.
