Darwin Confesses evolution not being conceivable!

[Arikay]

Maybe check out this thread,
http://www.christianforums.com/t58350

The lady hope story is False.

Charles Darwin, 1809-1882, English Naturalist, doveloped the modern theory of evolution.
The following is a conversation with Lady Hope of Northfield England in the closing days of Darwin's life:

Darwin confessed Jesus Christ as Lord before he died. I think we'll be suprised at some of the people we find in heaven when we get there!

 

[TransformedByGrace]

In a college course the leading evolutionary professor in the US revealed the truth. He said "The real problem for us is the lack of transitional fossils" When a student asked him what he meant by "lack of transitional fossils", he quickly responded with his answer, "Zero".
Darwin did indead claim that he "just needed some time" for the fossils to be found, he said that surely we would find many soon (in 1859), after several decades, still not one has been found, and none ever will be. As for the comment about the internet equivalent of The Sun... how many times was the "nebraska man" the "piltdown man" and dozens of other PROVEN EVOLUTIONARY HOAXES printed in papers without proof. Did the school kids examine all those before they were preached it? Did the teachers at the elemntary school preaching it every pick up the nebraska TOOTH and take a look at it? How many... But nearly all people have seen for themselves the glory and splendor of God's created nature first hand. And the miracules present in nature, and all over the earth are proof enough to realize that there MUST have been somebody to put all of it together (without being beaten over the head with a false-truth textbook written by other humans and taught to us be people no smarter than the person before them.) The reason evolution is "so widely accepted"(yeah right! over 40% of college professors believe in God) is because of textbook ideas beaten into your face from age 5 to 18, this isn't needed to believe in God, you just have to look around to see God's design.

 

[TransformedByGrace]

The more you think the less you know,
the more you know the less you think.

Now does that mean that the more one thinks on his own, the less (force-fed evolutionary ideas) he knows? Yet the less he thinks on his own (and just listens to what everybody else tells him, but never actually tests the ideas himself) the more (like you) he thinks?

 

[Arikay]

1) There are transitional fossils.

2) Evolutionists were the ones to discover those hoaxes and then dropped them. If they are being reprinted in books, your problem is with the text book manufactures.

3) I take it you are going to glaze over that your information about lady hope was false. Since, what do you do when your statement has found out to be false? Why jump to another false statement. Of course.

In a college course the leading evolutionary professor in the US revealed the truth. He said "The real problem for us is the lack of transitional fossils" When a student asked him what he meant by "lack of transitional fossils", he quickly responded with his answer, "Zero".
Darwin did indead claim that he "just needed some time" for the fossils to be found, he said that surely we would find many soon (in 1859), after several decades, still not one has been found, and none ever will be. As for the comment about the internet equivalent of The Sun... how many times was the "nebraska man" the "piltdown man" and dozens of other PROVEN EVOLUTIONARY HOAXES printed in papers without proof. Did the school kids examine all those before they were preached it? Did the teachers at the elemntary school preaching it every pick up the nebraska TOOTH and take a look at it? How many... But nearly all people have seen for themselves the glory and splendor of God's created nature first hand. And the miracules present in nature, and all over the earth are proof enough to realize that there MUST have been somebody to put all of it together (without being beaten over the head with a false-truth textbook written by other humans and taught to us be people no smarter than the person before them.) The reason evolution is "so widely accepted"(yeah right! over 40% of college professors believe in God) is because of textbook ideas beaten into your face from age 5 to 18, this isn't needed to believe in God, you just have to look around to see God's design.

 

[Arikay]

LoL.

The more you think the less you know = The more you think the more you realize how much you really dont know.

the more you know the less you think = The more you "know" the less you actually think about it.

Now does that mean that the more one thinks on his own, the less (force-fed evolutionary ideas) he knows? Yet the less he thinks on his own (and just listens to what everybody else tells him, but never actually tests the ideas himself) the more (like you) he thinks?

 

[TransformedByGrace]

I'm not going to glaze over anything, I don't have proof of a story if it it not true. Likewise, you neither have proof that it was false, lets call it heresay for the sake of not arguing.

 

[Arikay]

Um, but there was some evidence that it was false. His wife who was by his side (and a christian I believe) dennies the story ever happend.

 

[TransformedByGrace]

I think that is heresay. Prove it, but until you give her my phone number to call directly her, I'm not gonna believe gossip. Again for the sake of arguing over something not worth arguing about, I admit, that I have no proof and have not heard first-hand from any of the present parties that it is true.

 

[Meatros]

I think that is heresay. Prove it, but until you give her my phone number to call directly her, I'm not gonna believe gossip. Again for the sake of arguing over something not worth arguing about, I admit, that I have no proof and have not heard first-hand from any of the present parties that it is true.

Um...WHAT? How old do you think she is? You do realize you are already accepting gossip about her, right?

 

[TransformedByGrace]

you know, i used to do this alot... sit around and give tidbits of information for hours upon hours, not realizeing that the reason I am here is not to win arguments, which seems to be every evos dream... it's to win souls for Jesus Christ. And I don't type fast enough to give even .1% of the PROOF AGAINST evo that I know, so farewell, im off to a land where i don't have to type so much...

 

[Meatros]

you know, i used to do this alot... sit around and give tidbits of information for hours upon hours, not realizeing that the reason I am here is not to win arguments, which seems to be every evos dream... it's to win souls for Jesus Christ. And I don't type fast enough to give even .1% of the PROOF AGAINST evo that I know, so farewell, im off to a land where i don't have to type so much...

So you aren't here to learn a thing? I think it's sad that your mind is closed and even worse, you spread this ignorance. In addition, your last statement seems to imply that you don't have the effort to win soul's for Christ.

 

[troodon]

it's to win souls for Jesus Christ.

Might I suggest you drop the YEC act then?

 

[Arikay]

LoL.

Can I say the same thing about everyone in the bible? Give me their phone numbers as I wont accept gossip.

As was mentioned, you seem to accept gossip when its against Darwin.

I think that is heresay. Prove it, but until you give her my phone number to call directly her, I'm not gonna believe gossip. Again for the sake of arguing over something not worth arguing about, I admit, that I have no proof and have not heard first-hand from any of the present parties that it is true.

 

[Meatros]

Might I suggest you drop the YEC act then?

Exactly. I mean, if she is this mistaken about evolution and she still promotes what she doesn't know, then why should I trust what she thinks about Christ?

(a bit of a non-sequitor...)

 

[blixation]

Can anyone explain the origin of the universe then? I'm not talking about evolution which is so called "the process," after the origin but the origin of the universe.

Why would we talk about the Big Bang and why not any other bang? You know when Bertram Russell was asked where the origin of the universe came from he said, "It's just there!" You know why can't we as Christians say that about God 'He's just there!' aww that's not satisfactory enough for everyone. But the 'Big Bang' can explain it's bangingness, its a nimbus in its protection. But when it comes to God who will judge the world in righteousness, He all of sudden is questioned, poked, and proded.

But the question is, explain the origin of the universe? Since many here are so well educated.

 

[Pete Harcoff]

But the question is, explain the origin of the universe? Since many here are so well educated.

...

Anyone else sense a troll in our midst? The laundry list of creationist silliness is too much...

 

[Arikay]

1) Evolution is not "the process" The Theory of evolution is only about the change and adaption of organisms. Not about the begining of life Nor about the begining of the universe.

2) We talk about the big bang as its the best current theory to explain All of the evidence.

3) Origin as in first cause? we have ideas, but no, we can explain it. One idea is that it was "just there" another is god, another has to do with quantum fluctions and stuff. None of the ideas have been falsified, and thus they are all still valid.

Can anyone explain the origin of the universe then? I'm not talking about evolution which is so called "the process," after the origin but the origin of the universe.

Why would we talk about the Big Bang and why not any other bang? You know when Bertram Russell was asked where the origin of the universe came from he said, "It's just there!" You know why can't we as Christians say that about God 'He's just there!' aww that's not satisfactory enough for everyone. But the 'Big Bang' can explain it's bangingness, its a nimbus in its protection. But when it comes to God who will judge the world in righteousness, He all of sudden is questioned, poked, and proded.

But the question is, explain the origin of the universe? Since many here are so well educated.

 

[blixation]

Looks like the energy of the evolutists run thine when it comes to answering this question. Isn't it easy to throw off course the question being stated to ease our minds.

 

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Looks like the energy of the evolutists run thine when it comes to answering this question. Isn't it easy to throw off course the question being stated to ease our minds.

Do you know what off topic means??????

 

[TransformedByGrace]

This will turn into an entire new post, watch it... but seriously, I am ready to answer any question about my belief in God, why won't evos do the same?