Dangers of doing science

[joinfree]

The Atom Bomb. Hiroshima. But atoms consists of quarks. Can we make Quark Bomb? No, because there is no individual quarks. But these talks about super-weapons of pre-flood people? Only one detail: they used spells, the contact with fallen angels. Our "free will" is violation of nature laws. So the free will of fallen angels is much more dramatic violation of them. Therefore, trying not to do magic, we can do science: study the laws in nature -- the materialized will of the true God. Hereby our achievements, got by terrorists, won't do much harm, because we can not make the Quark Bomb. You may argue, that the treasure chest of nature is bottomless. But, actually, it has bottom. And it only seems provide infinite possibilities, because mostly we shall correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained. And mistakes are certainly there, as prime example: Black Hole "Hawking temperature" in two abstracts of [1] is different. But must be the same, because it is his most famous discovery. Has the World gone with true one? As next example: "all" scientists used solution of dust collapse almost century, but it was wrong [2].

Outstanding person and a successful scientist Rudolf Peierls also noticed errors [3]; I have not got the unappreciated his work, so I can not agree with him. Honest work on the errors, as I understand, has not begun. You postpone everything until the Second Coming? But God speaks: Matthew 25:26.

[1] Hawking SW. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Comm Math Phys. 1975;43:199-220. Hawking SW. Black hole explosions? Nature. 1974;248:30-1.

[2] Trevor W Marshall, Max K Wallis. Journal of Cosmology. 2010;6:1473-84.

[3] Rudolf Peierls, Surprises in Theoretical Physics, Princeton University Press, 1979; More Surprises in Theoretical Physics (Princeton Series in Physics), 1991.

So do the delusional scientists (possibly the majority) believe in the True Theories?

The source of false theories (with the exception of the True ones) are fantasies, hallucinations, protests [against the Scientific Theology (the YE Creationism) by Darwinists, against the Religion by the adherents of the church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster] and the revelation of spirits (UFOlogy). Adherents of false theories (not excluding the idolatry "All is Nothing", because the True God is scientifically proven) are aware of the unsightly origins of their theories. However, they do not want to call a theory false, because then it is necessary to recognize the existence of an Objective Opinion (Truth), that is, the True God. After all, reasonable research (based on the Truth) of theories proves their falsity.

Opposer: "Who of the believers does not consider his theory to be true?" Indeed, the Faith is the faithfulness to Knowledge, so the Dedicated Scientists do believe in their knowledge (the knowledge, which is protected by Presumption of Innocence: you are not wrong, until you'd be proven wrong). But please do not listen to delusional scientists' answers to your questions, judge the situation by the facts. I have everything within the True Science. I do not say groundlessly. Is it possible to have a lot of false theories in God's Paradise?

 

[Roseonathorn]

You can make Coca Cola bomb, it explodes with two mentos. One big bottle of Coke and two mentos and You will explode up all Your poisoned oysterdinner or dangerous medicine anyone recently swallowed. Coke and mentos should be on every First aid box at every beachguards fridge. It is a fast, gentle and easy way to make someone puke within minutes. A real lifesaver if used right. See youtube on 50 ways to use coke and sooner or later two guys show what I mean.

 

[Petros2015]

Quark bomb may be our only hope against Flying Spaghetti Post.

 

[Roseonathorn]

Really? How do You know the spaghetty is done? One woman did show me, she was blond too. She threw up on piece in the ceiling. If it get stuck it is done How do You know the Quark bomb is ready. I hope You don´t throw that one up in the ceiling too? I usually make my quark with blueberry and raspberry and our ceiling is wooden and we have no spaghetti there. I usually let the quark sit in the fridge overnight whith whipped cream and done next day.

 

[Petros2015]

Really? How do You know the spaghetty is done?

I use outstanding person and a successful scientist Rudolf Peierls.[3] Together with super-weapons of pre-flood people. And it only seems provide infinite possibilities, because mostly we shall correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained. I have everything within the True Science. I do not say groundlessly.

 

[DogmaHunter]

The Atom Bomb.

1. that's engineering, not science

2. half a million dead by atomic bombs, MILLIONS still alive thanks to being able to power their house due to nuclear energy, MILLIONS still alive thanks to nuclear medical equipment.

3. that's the 21st century equivalent of saying "melting iron is evil, don't make the sword!!!" during the iron age.


Rest of your post seems like word salad rambling.

 

[AlexDTX]

The Atom Bomb. Hiroshima. But atoms consists of quarks. Can we make Quark Bomb? No, because there is no individual quarks. But these talks about super-weapons of pre-flood people? Only one detail: they used spells, the contact with fallen angels. Our "free will" is violation of nature laws. So the free will of fallen angels is much more dramatic violation of them. Therefore, trying not to do magic, we can do science: study the laws in nature -- the materialized will of the true God. Hereby our achievements, got by terrorists, won't do much harm, because we can not make the Quark Bomb. You may argue, that the treasure chest of nature is bottomless. But, actually, it has bottom. And it only seems provide infinite possibilities, because mostly we shall correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained. And mistakes are certainly there, as prime example: Black Hole "Hawking temperature" in two abstracts of [1] is different. But must be the same, because it is his most famous discovery. Has the World gone with true one? As next example: "all" scientists used solution of dust collapse almost century, but it was wrong [2].

Outstanding person and a successful scientist Rudolf Peierls also noticed errors [3]; I have not got the unappreciated his work, so I can not agree with him. Honest work on the errors, as I understand, has not begun. You postpone everything until the Second Coming? But God speaks: Matthew 25:26.

[1] Hawking SW. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Comm Math Phys. 1975;43:199-220. Hawking SW. Black hole explosions? Nature. 1974;248:30-1.

[2] Trevor W Marshall, Max K Wallis. Journal of Cosmology. 2010;6:1473-84.

[3] Rudolf Peierls, Surprises in Theoretical Physics, Princeton University Press, 1979; More Surprises in Theoretical Physics (Princeton Series in Physics), 1991.

So do the delusional scientists (possibly the majority) believe in the True Theories?

The source of false theories (with the exception of the True ones) are fantasies, hallucinations, protests [against the Scientific Theology (the YE Creationism) by Darwinists, against the Religion by the adherents of the church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster] and the revelation of spirits (UFOlogy). Adherents of false theories (not excluding the idolatry "All is Nothing", because the True God is scientifically proven) are aware of the unsightly origins of their theories. However, they do not want to call a theory false, because then it is necessary to recognize the existence of an Objective Opinion (Truth), that is, the True God. After all, reasonable research (based on the Truth) of theories proves their falsity.

Opposer: "Who of the believers does not consider his theory to be true?" Indeed, the Faith is the faithfulness to Knowledge, so the Dedicated Scientists do believe in their knowledge (the knowledge, which is protected by Presumption of Innocence: you are not wrong, until you'd be proven wrong). But please do not listen to delusional scientists' answers to your questions, judge the situation by the facts. I have everything within the True Science. I do not say groundlessly. Is it possible to have a lot of false theories in God's Paradise?

It seems like you might have a worthy topic of discussion, but your writing rambles and is difficult to understand. The few who have responded are making fun of your post.

Are you calling the modern scientific method what used to be called alchemy, sorcery and witchcraft of the past?

 

[SkyWriting]

You may argue, that the treasure chest of nature is bottomless. But, actually, it has bottom. And it only seems provide infinite possibilities, because mostly we shall correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained.

WIth more error. Don't forget that.

 

[Roseonathorn]

I use outstanding person and a successful scientist Rudolf Peierls.[3] Together with super-weapons of pre-flood people. And it only seems provide infinite possibilities, because mostly we shall correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained. I have everything within the True Science. I do not say groundlessly.

Ok, I use to twist it around a fork. If it bend nicely, it´s done. Usually I have glutenfree spagetti with nettles and seagrass or something odder when I cook them...so I need no superweapons...except my arms. And they are quite extraordinary when trained.

 

[Chesterton]

None of this anti-matters now.

(Courtesy Hawkwind)

 

[Roseonathorn]

It seems like you might have a worthy topic of discussion, but your writing rambles and is difficult to understand. The few who have responded are making fun of your post.

Are you calling the modern scientific method what used to be called alchemy, sorcery and witchcraft of the past?

Beg Your pardon! I thought You were discussing food recipes. I sure do not understand higher speeches. I did not think it was serious science.

 

[joinfree]

It seems like you might have a worthy topic of discussion, but your writing rambles and is difficult to understand. The few who have responded are making fun of your post.

Are you calling the modern scientific method what used to be called alchemy, sorcery and witchcraft of the past?

I see no such harsh words in the thread. Do I have reasons to call Einstein's Physics as sorcery? No.

I have fellow Physicist Dr.Groote, so I can ask him to "ease" my line of thought.

 

[Roseonathorn]

Why did they have the Hiroshima bomb to explode over people? Did Einstein give that order or did someone else give that order? Who gave that order?

 

[AlexDTX]

I see no such harsh words in the thread. Do I have reasons to call Einstein's Physics as sorcery? No.

I have fellow Physicist Dr.Groote, so I can ask him to "ease" my line of thought.

Then, as I said, I find your post rambling and confusing. My question was to clarify what you are saying, but this is not the case. And since you don't see the others as making fun of you, it is clear that I can not contribute to the conversation. Sorry for taking a slight interest in what you are trying to say.

 

[DogmaHunter]

WIth more error. Don't forget that.

How's that device working out for you that you are using to post your messages at lightspeed so that they are instantly readable by people at the other side of the planet?

 

[SkyWriting]

How's that device working out for you that you are using to post your messages at lightspeed so that they are instantly readable by people at the other side of the planet?

Research shows that the more people use the internet
the more susceptible they are for depression. Likely
suicide rates are higher as well.

The correlation of depression with Internet use and body image
The correlation of depression with Internet use and body image in Korean adolescents

 

[DogmaHunter]

Research shows that the more people use the internet
the more susceptible they are for depression. Likely
suicide rates are higher as well.

The correlation of depression with Internet use and body image
The correlation of depression with Internet use and body image in Korean adolescents

Which is like, completely irrelevant to the fact that science works and gets things done.

 

[Chesterton]

Which is like, completely irrelevant to the fact that science works and gets things done.

Plus, this just in:

Just Having Your Smartphone In The Room Makes You Dumber

 

[Petros2015]

Which is like, completely irrelevant to the fact that science works and gets things done.

What it is getting done is not irrelevant though. The ability to communicate at light speed around the world is only a good thing if the majority of the information being transmitted is true, useful and not harmful.

Science makes us more powerful, it doesn't make us better. It also makes us rely on it more and more as time goes on, and on other things, less and less. What use is science to a population that alternately fries itself out and stirs itself to riot on mindless entertainment and broadcast punditry? But science will be there to help others market little pills for that population. And science will be there to track the products that population consumes, and their voting patterns, and choose their commercials for them...

I'll tell you want I want science to do. Invent an infallible lie-detector. That would be culturally useful in legal courts, politics and pretty much everything. If everyone knew 100% when they were being lied to, it would clear a lot of things up.

But in lieu of that...

A Quark Bomb sounds pretty kewl.

 

[joinfree]

..... Sorry for taking a slight interest in what you are trying to say.

We are living in post-modern. But my line of thought is much higher than that.