Cruz sex scandal

[benedictaoo]

How come nobody is talking about this?

https://avengersocial.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/interview-with-a-candy-wrapper-the-lollipop-edition/

 

[Kersh]

Perhaps because it is an unsubstantiated and seemingly unsupportable allegation.

 

[Cos-play]

This is want you should be listening to:

http://wtop.com/presidential-electi...w-release-of-d-c-madam-phone-records-or-else/

In an application to the high court, filed Monday, Montgomery Blair Sibley is asking to be released from a judge’s 2007 restraining order which prohibited him from sharing Palfrey’s telephone records, during the much-publicized run-up to her federal trial for racketeering, money laundering and mail fraud.

And, if the Supreme Court won’t hear his argument, Sibley says he will release the identifying information of Palfrey’s customers.

Sibley, whose license to practice law in Washington, D.C. was suspended for three years in 2008, has sued former Chief Judge Richard Roberts of D.C.’s U.S. District Court, and Clerk of the Court Angela Caesar for $1 million each, claiming his First and Fifth Amendment rights have been violated because he has been unable to argue for the release of Palfrey’s records.

Sibley is saying that the records have bearing on the current Presidential race.

Specifically, there is information in the records pertaining to one of the candidates.

 

[Fantine]

Don't think Cruz was in Washington during that time. Only Kasich and Sanders were, and the sexiest septugenarian alive wouldn't need an escort service.

Well, I was wrong. The D.C. Madam was operating between 1994 and 2007, and Cruz was in Washington from 1999 and 2003.

(Wikipedia) Between 1999 and 2003, he was the Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice, and domestic policy advisor to George W. Bush on the 2000 George W. Bush presidential campaign.

Well, he would be my top suspect, because he certainly seems to be the most reprehensible of the bunch.

 

[CGL1023]

How come nobody is talking about this?

https://avengersocial.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/interview-with-a-candy-wrapper-the-lollipop-edition/

Without some means of corroborating the contents of the article, what was said in it should be considered, 'just talk'. To go off in the direction the article leads to, amounts to lynching Ted Cruz via the media.

I am a Trump supporter but I believe Ted Cruz to be a Christian; that may have strayed from the 'straight and narrow' in the past. I believe him to be a solid Christian that will have repented and sought the Lord's forgiveness. He may have shameful deeds in his past but that is no different from any other Christian. We Christians are (2 Cor 5:17) ... new creatures in Christ; old things are passed away, behold all things are new.

I suppose that something like what Cruz is accused of, may have happened because he has not come out strongly against the charges leveled against him. I am watching Glen Beck, who has said that he will dump Cruz if the charges are found to be true. I believe Ted Cruz to be that 'new creation' just mentioned above.

 

[PsychoeDial]

Don't think Cruz was in Washington during that time. Only Kasich and Sanders were, and the sexiest septugenarian alive wouldn't need an escort service.

Unless one was a senior Senator prone to rape fantasy. Buying an escort that's willing insures anonymity.

Well, I was wrong. The D.C. Madam was operating between 1994 and 2007, and Cruz was in Washington from 1999 and 2003.



Well, he would be my top suspect, because he certainly seems to be the most reprehensible of the bunch.

I wouldn't say this is impossible. I'll wait to see what comes out in the wash.

 

[benedictaoo]

We are not talking about it because the media is biased. Out to get Trump.