Creationists-Only Thread

[Notedstrangeperson]

This is a quick invation to my thread down in Creation & Evolution: Was Homo Erectus a Human?

I decided to post the link here because not all of the creationists up in Origins Theology go down to the Society section, and I'd like the opinion of as many as I can get.

 

[Gozreht]

I posted this on the other thread to.


I appreciate the invitation and your consideration to ask this question. I will also appreciate the openness to hear and not ridicule and judge if this is not to scientific standards and theories.

Let me start with the 2nd question. I have stated in the other thread about apes that what the main difference is is not based on physical qualities but the gift of a spirit in man. I will say though that I believe man does change, evolve if you will allow, over time. But not from one species to another. We are taller. We live longer. We may be smarter (that is still in question). But I don't feel that is part of evolution as the classic definition fits it. I have other things but it is not what you are asking for so I will leave you with this.

Homo Erectus could have been man, even spirit filled, but it would be the only one I would say had the odds of being one.

Again thank you for the honest questions.