Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Much better than just that. A Neanderthal was human from what I've googled. In the past state with rapid evolution I suspect that the living creature could evolve on his feet! No need of offspring. Possibly it was by offspring, but I see no need because offspring is just the way it NOW works!Now you're claiming that a human could have given birth to a Neanderthal?
Please you aren't that stupid to think that is what I meant. Don't embarrass yourself.Thank you! I agree. That is the point. The past was different. Not the same. Same is out.
Actually every piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked millions of years ago exactly the way it does today.Science is all about the evidence. Your "same state past" has none. Therefore much of science is all about fables.
I think you're confusing what you do with what science does. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that physics in the past worked any differently than it does today.There is not the tiniest shred of evidence of any kind that the past had our nature and laws. That is wholly assumed. When they look at evidence they bring that belief and assumption with them, and spray paint the evidence!
Once again, it is a very simple English phrase;Climate fear mongers are false prophets as are cosmologists who claim things about the far future. Really. Literally. Call it what you like.
No. Check the basis for the dates. The error curve rises exponentially once they even get near the state change! That is because the way they check the dates is by correlating with things like tree rings etc. In the former state trees could grow rings and all in weeks. That does you no good here.Written language is older than 4,400 years (oldest written languages we find are from roughly 5,000 years ago), but I am sure you will try to dismiss that date too. However, humans and dinosaurs living at the same time equals humans being ate.
Really? Because this is the first result I got when I googled "were Neanderthals human?"Much better than just that. A Neanderthal was human from what I've googled.
Congratulations! You win the award for the stupidest thing I have read to today.In the past state with rapid evolution I suspect that the living creature could evolve on his feet! No need of offspring. Possibly it was by offspring, but I see no need because offspring is just the way it NOW works!
If you didn't mean what you said, guess who needs to be embarrassed?Please you aren't that stupid to think that is what I meant. Don't embarrass yourself.
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that physics in the past worked any differently than it does today.
None at all anywhere in any way actually. You claiming it doesn't make it true. I know what you got, and that is plenty of nothin.Actually every piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked millions of years ago exactly the way it does today.
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that physics in the past worked the same as it does today. None. Zip. Nada.I think you're confusing what you do with what science does. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that physics in the past worked any differently than it does today.
No? So? The thing to learn would be how to tell truth from lies and false prophesy from the real deal.Once again, it is a very simple English phrase;
"No, I don't understand the difference between projection and prophecy."
The bible. Since there is no science or evidence against this it stands like a tree.What is your evidence for this claim?
From your linkReally? Because this is the first result I got when I googled "were Neanderthals human?"
Were Neanderthals a sub-species of modern humans? New research says no
No, I meant what I said. I didn't mean what you tried to claim I said however.If you didn't mean what you said, guess who needs to be embarrassed?
Every piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked the same today as it did in the past. Even the Bible does so. Unless you want to claim that the rain the contributed to the Flood was not rain as we know it.There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that physics in the past worked the same as it does today. The bible indicates things were different. That beats your nothing all to hell.
Actually, science has everything. Your empty claim has nothing.None at all anywhere in any way actually. You claiming it doesn't make it true. I know what you got, and that is plenty of nothin.
Every piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked the same today as it did in the past. Even the Bible does so. Unless you want to claim that the rain the contributed to the Flood was not rain as we know it.There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that physics in the past worked the same as it does today. None. Zip. Nada.
We have. That is exactly how we know that your claims are nothing but empty balloons that pop at the first sign of evidence. Someday you will understand it as well, although I think that it will take Jesus personally slapping you upside the head before you acknowledge it.No? So? The thing to learn would be how to tell truth from lies and false prophesy from the real deal.
Since there is absolutely no evidence that physics today works any differently than physics 100,000 years ago, there is no logical reason whatsoever to consider a "different state past".From your link
"
They argue that studies of the Neanderthal nose, which have spanned over a century and a half, have been approaching this anatomical enigma from the wrong perspective. Previous work has compared Neanderthal nasal dimensions to modern human populations such as the Inuit and modern Europeans, whose nasal complexes are adapted to cold and temperate climates.
However, the current study joins a growing body of evidence that the upper respiratory tracts of this extinct group functioned via a different set of rules as a result of a separate evolutionary history and overall cranial bauplan (bodyplan), resulting in a mosaic of features not found among any population of Homo sapiens."
It is foolish not to account for the pre flood world and former nature when considering noses and uses. The klutzes who prognosticate over dead bones display such limited thinking and bias that it beggars description.
Gen 2. God planted a garden we are told. That garden had trees. The world was a week old. Need more? Planting means seeds usually. That means they grew. No?Which verses would that be?
Since there is absolutely no evidence that physics today works any differently than physics 100,000 years ago, there is no logical reason whatsoever to consider a "different state past".
NO piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked the same today as it did in the past. None at all. Period. Get over it.Every piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked the same today as it did in the past.
I have not seen windows in space open up to pour water down...you?Even the Bible does so. Unless you want to claim that the rain the contributed to the Flood was not rain as we know it.
Gen 2. God planted a garden we are told. That garden had trees. The world was a week old. Need more? Planting means seeds usually. That means they grew. No?
Gen 2. God planted a garden we are told. That garden had trees. The world was a week old. Need more? Planting means seeds usually. That means they grew. No?
There is nothing in Genesis 2 that states anything about trees growing in a week. It simply says they grew. Try again.Gen 2. God planted a garden we are told. That garden had trees. The world was a week old. Need more? Planting means seeds usually. That means they grew. No?
Since there is absolutely no evidence that physics today works any differently than physics 100,000 years ago, there is no logical reason whatsoever to consider a "different state past".Since there is absolutely no evidence that physics today works the same as physics 100,000 imaginary years ago, there is no logical reason whatsoever to consider a "same state past".
No one is spitting on God's Word except you.Especially when that exercise results in spitting on God's word.
Since there is absolutely no evidence that physics today works any differently than physics 100,000 years ago, there is no logical reason whatsoever to consider a "different state past".NO piece of evidence we have indicates that physics worked the same today as it did in the past. None at all. Period. Get over it.
It was was rainI have not seen windows in space open up to pour water down...you?
Genesis 2 does not describe creation. Genesis one does. The trees grew in a day; day three.There is nothing in Genesis 2 that states anything about trees growing in a week. It simply says they grew. Try again.
To repeat myself, competition with placental mammals.
You've made no point to respond to.
I don't know if I can dumb it down further for you. Nothing is stopping placentals from migrating, . . .
Again, what is this mysterious power forcing antelope to chase after moles?
Thank you! I agree. That is the point. The past was different. Not the same. Same is out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?