- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope, a lucky find of Neanderthal DNA confirms that they are not a human ancestor.
Doesn't matter at all with rapid evolution! We changed as needed fast. The only place that matters in inside your baseless belief system where you subjectively declare N man 'not a human'. No change is too great for the wonderful real past.
I seem to recall someone mentioning that N man interbred with humans. Do you really think people were so daft after the flood that they had sex with monkeys?
Here's a primer on the subject, something I'm sure the evolutionists will endlessly wring their hands over because it actually makes sense.
From the Ark, Terrestrial animal life was distributed either by land migration or rafting via oceanic currents. Dispersal through ocean currents also explains distributions of terrestrial plant life along coastlines.
You seem to be claiming DNA used to be the same? Good luck with that. N man if you are right DID have DNA, but who says that in the former state things would work out that we got it passed down?People have investigated that possibility: if humans ever had offspring with Neanderthals, the Neanderthal genes are no longer in our gene pool. For crying out loud, we have their DNA dad, what more do you want? They didn't even originate in the same geographic region; humans first appear in Africa. Neanderthals are restricted to Europe.
You seem to be claiming DNA used to be the same? Good luck with that. N man if you are right DID have DNA, but who says that in the former state things would work out that we got it passed down?
"
When our ancestors first migrated out of Africa around 60,000 years ago, they were not alone. At that time, at least two other species of hominid cousins walked the Eurasian landmassNeanderthals and Denisovans. As our modern human ancestors migrated through Eurasia, they encountered the Neanderthals and interbred. Because of this, a small amount of Neanderthal DNA was introduced into the modern human gene pool.
Everyone living outside of Africa today has a small amount of Neanderthal in them, carried as a living relic of these ancient encounters. A team of scientists comparing the full genomes of the two species concluded that most Europeans and Asians have between 1 to 4 percent Neanderthal DNA"
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/neanderthal/
"
At least one-fifth of the Neanderthal genome may lurk within modern humans, influencing the skin, hair and diseases people have today, researchers say.
Although modern humans are the only surviving human lineage, other groups of early humans used to live on Earth. The closest extinct relatives of modern humans were the Neanderthals, who lived in Europe and Asia until they went extinct about 40,000 years ago. The ancestors of modern humans diverged from those of Neanderthals"
At least 20% of Neanderthal DNA Is in Humans
First, there were no continents when the animals got off the Ark.
The earth at the time was one landmass from Genesis 1.
Genesis 1:9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
The Bible calls it Eden, scientists call it Pangaea.
The one single ocean that emcompassed this landmass was called Panthalassa.
Second, you have to realize that God brought the animals to the Ark, and He would certainly lead them back home.
One way He could have done that is intimated in Acts 8 with the Apostle Philip.
Acts 8:38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
Acts 8:39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.
Acts 8:40 But Philip was found at Azotus: and passing through he preached in all the cities, till he came to Caesarea.
Just as God teleported Philip miles away, He could have teleported the animals back to their respective ecological niches as they disembarked.
And the Smithsonian made a different conclusion. Shocking twist, scientists don't always degree. There is a split on this issue, some, such as myself, do not view Neanderthals as interbreeding to any significant extent with humans, others view differently. There are credible sources on both sides of that, but all agree by this point that humans did not evolve from Neanderthals. Interbreeding doesn't make Neanderthals human ancestors like you seem to think it does. And that is if it even did happen. Now, I read your sources, but did you read mine?
That makes zero sense. How was this able to keep so many placental mammals out of Australia?
It could have been any number of reasons.
Why didn't placental mammals thrive in Australia in an evolutionary model? Think about your answer before you respond.
The marsupial mole was able to run quickly across the Earth to get to Australia, but the Antelope could not? Sounds like a lot of bovine feces to me.
Your evolutionary explanation is no less ad-hoc than mine. ("Natural Selection dun it.") Marsupials happened to ecologically thrive in Australia while placentals didn't. The exact reasons are unclear.
Try again.
It could have been any number of reasons.
Why didn't placental mammals thrive in Australia in an evolutionary model?
Like what?
Australia broke off from the Americas before the newly evolved placental mammals could migrate there and establish a foothold.
There is only limited fossil evidence of a few placentals making it to Australia before the continent moved away so that no more placentals could make it to Australia until very recently.
The flood doesn't explain the fossil record in Australia, nor the post-flood species distribution. You claim there are reasons, but you can't give us one.
Like placental mammal populations were more favored in other regions.
Like marsupials were the first to be driven from a central mammal population, and thus became established in more distant regions.
Here is Evolutionists' "explanation" for the lack of placentals in Australia:
"In Australia, terrestrial placental mammals disappeared early in the Cenozoic (their most recent known fossils being 55 million-year-old teeth resembling those of condylarths) for reasons that are not clear, allowing marsupials to dominate the Australian ecosystem."
Marsupial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So why couldn't placentals potentially have reached Australia via rafting events? Wouldn't that be your explanation if that's what was found?
So why did the placental mammals die off?
Based on what?
What do you mean "based on what"? It stands to reason that marsupials would be driven furthest from placental dominated regions.
Is there some magical barrier preventing marsupials migrating somewhere that placentals didn't?
Why wouldn't Australia be placental dominated? How were the marsupial moles able to outrun the antelope to Australia?
Is there a magical barrier that prevented placentals from migrating to Australia?
What do you mean "based on what"? It stands to reason that marsupials would be driven furthest from placental dominated regions. Is there some magical barrier preventing marsupials migrating somewhere that placentals didn't? I'd love to hear you explain this. But to do that, you'd have to have an argument, and we know you don't like those.
It would be interesting for him to explain that. I'm with you, I doubt that happens.
What is this magical power making it impossible for Antelope to resist running to Australia?
Nope. Got an argument yet as to why placentals HAD to migrate to Australia no matter what? Were they being herded by the Darwin fairies?
How can marsupial moles beat antelope to Australia?
Why wouldn't they migrate to Australia?
Marsupials are driven away from central Eurasian placental populations, and consequently are the first groups to migrate across a land bridge from southeast Asia to Australia. By the time placental populations migrate in large numbers to southeast Asian region, the land bridge has significantly subsided. There is your explanation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?