Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
According to google, the only person who has ever heard of "the Sceva effect" is you.Who does Satan tempt more? Christians or non-Christians?
Ever heard of the Sceva effect?
If you agree that the Bible Belt has the highest pregnancy rate in the USA, what makes you think that the way they go about teaching sex education is the way to go?Is this what I get for agreeing with you that the Bible belt has the highest rate of teen pregnancies in the USA?
If you agree that the Bible Belt has the highest pregnancy rate in the USA, what makes you think that the way they go about teaching sex education is the way to go?
Then why is it that the states where sex education is less informative or not taught at all have the most pregnancies?Affirmative.
Except let's change "encourages" to "tempts."
Not really. Individuals have all sorts of off-the-wall hobbies, even highly successful science and engineering types. Now if NASA went looking for Noah's Ark, then you might have something.Well i think for a NASA astronaut to go looking for Noah's ark says something about it's validity.
Dogs can have a litter of 4-10 pups (depending on breed) every year beginning at around six months old. Can humans?Dogs can achieve incredible genetic diversity in a very short time, but humans can't?
Yes, it is impressive but it really breaks the formatting of the thread.I could use a smaller picture, but that one is so impressive.
Biology explains incised meanders?Ark believers cannot explain the formation. It can only be explained by the standard model of biology.
Yes, it is impressive but it really breaks the formatting of the thread.
Biology explains incised meanders?
That is the same population doubling rate that you gave earlier. Are you no longer accepting that model?That was the premise of The Population Bomb. It was wrong of course. The examples given show that it doesn't take anywhere near 150 years for a population to double, it can happen quickly. That eliminates the population argument that flood deniers put forth.
What nations have been under siege for at least the decade and half required for the first year of new "warriors" to come up to fighting standard?Other factors in population growth include the pressure to reproduce. In agrarian societies, large families are needed to help till the soil. When nations are besieged, they need a high birth rate to produce warriors for defense.
Except that goes completely against the evidence. The beginnings of the industrial revolution was accompanied by a sharp decline in infant mortality rates and that is when population growth began to shoot up exponentially.As societies became more mechanized and infant mortality rates began to decline, so did the population growth.
When you have more than 1800 threads where you are the only participant and do nothing more than post numbers counting to a 1,000 in a lame attempt to intentionally inflate your post count, who cares how many posts you have?
I have 318 times more posts than you, and you say this?
Care to back it up?
Stating your beliefs is in no way defending your beliefs.Unless embedded in that 10%, I have attempted to defend what he called my "faulty beliefs".
QV please:
No graphic but a quick internet search yielded thisDo you have a similar graphic for teen abortion rates? I know that one consequence of a higher teen pregnancy rate is a higher abortion rate. Being against sex education indicates that from the results that one must be pro-abortion.
You're asking this question to a guy who self identifies as a saint.
Yep, I saw you corrected that after I posted mine. I edited my post to acknowledge that.Actually that was an error of mine that I already owned up to. But I will do so again. I made a mistake, I meant to say geology, my post was clearly wrong.
ETA: And as you will see when I posted it again I did use a smaller version of the image.
Yes it is. I've seen it many times, it is a beautiful picture.If you want to see that image blown up several more times I can give you a link to it. It is still very clear and even more impresssive.
No graphic but a quick internet search yielded this
"Unwed pregnant teens and 20-somethings who attend or have graduated from private religious schools are more likely to obtain abortions than their peers from public schools, according to research in the June issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior."
Also this;
Q: Do Catholic women get abortions more frequently than Protestant women?
A: Catholics are slightly more likely to get an abortion than Protestants, according to a 2000-2001 survey.
More info at the links.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?