Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Yes, and over 90% of them are simply counting posts. No one that knows you is impressed with your post count AV. At best all you have shown is that you are wrong more than any else at this site.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have 318 times more posts than you, and you say this?
Care to back it up?
Yes, and over 90% of them are simply counting posts. No one that knows you is impressed with your post count AV. At best all you have shown is that you are wrong more than any else at this site.
I'll tell you what, SZ, you post one of my "faulty beliefs" you say I won't even try to defend, and I'll qv you to where I did defend it.
How's that?
In fact, I'll make it easy on you.
Just say something you think I said that I've never defended, and I'll qv otherwise.
Fair enough?
No thanks. All that your qv would be is another error at best. Why should I bother?
I'll tell you what, SZ, you post one of my "faulty beliefs" you say I won't even try to defend, and I'll qv you to where I did try to defend it.
How's that?
In fact, I'll make it easy on you.
Just say something you think I said that I've never defended, and I'll qv otherwise.
Fair enough?
Then you may want to reconsider your statement.
Please don't tell me I don't defend my beliefs, faulty or otherwise, or I'll show you differently.
THUNDERDOME!!!!!
Too late, you already refused to defend your beliefs here:
http://www.christianforums.com/t1028182-44/#post67346720
At least that is how a reasonable person would read that post.
What beliefs?
Flood geology can take a hike.
What's there to defend?
This isTHUNDERDOME post count doesn't matter.
There's a goofy site that has me "apparently believing" the following; and I want to set the record straight here:
1. At one point everyone in the world spoke English.
This is correct.
2. That the mention of unicorns, dragons and behemoths in the Bible poses a problem for evolution.
It poses a problem for evolutionists.
3. Cratering was the result of a battle between angels and demons.
This is correct.
4. Unicorns were aboard Noah's ark and gave birth to different species of animals.
This is correct; but they gave birth after they left the Ark.
5. Leprechauns exist as a manifestation of demons.
This is correct.
6. The Earth was the first planet in existence.
This is correct.
7. Peer reviewed articles on evolution should be disregarded because they weren't reviewed by Jesus.
I don't know where this comes from.
8. Human beings are not Homo sapiens.
This is somewhat correct. I claim I refuse to accept that I am a Homo sapiens. However I acknowledge that Homo sapiens is just a term on paper, and I respect the right of others to label themselves as such.
9. Nero persecuted Christians for reversing the Earth's poles.
That was a joke; as was my Noah's Ark being a submarine thread.
10. Pangaea was actually Eden.
This is correct.
11. The three main rock types are "indigenous, megamorphic, and sentimental."
That was a joke.
12. Noah lived in present-day New Jersey.
That is correct.
13. That the dictionary is wrong in defining Christianity as a religion.
I may have said that at one time, but I've since softened up on that. I claim that, just as weight occurs when gravity is resisted, religion occurs when Truth is resisted.
14. Religious wars never occurred.
I don't remember saying that.
15. "Evolution teaches a monkey gave birth to the first human."
This is correct.
16. Atheism is a polytheistic religion.
This is correct.
17. Strong's Concordance is "a tool of Satan."
This is correct.
18. People should be proud of their own ignorance.
This is correct.
19. Science is unreliable because of new discoveries.
This is correct.
20. Anything that contradicts the Bible is wrong by default, including real life.
This is correct.
Weren't you just telling me how silly it was to think that there would only be 24 people after 300 years?Calculating the actual doubling time and growth rate since the Flood when the population grew from 6 people (Noah’s 3 sons and their 3 wives) to 7.1 billion people in 4,500 years, we get an average doubling time of 149 years and an average annual percentage growth rate of 0.465%.
A slight increase in the annual growth rate has a significant impact on the population when the number of years of growth is large. If we increase the average annual percentage growth rate slightly from 0.465% to 0.50%, then those six people would grow to over 33 billion in 4500 years. Therefore it is completely feasible for Noah’s family to grow to 7 billion in 4500 years at an average annual growth rate of less than ½%. This annual growth rate, 0.465%, is less than half of the average annual percentage growth rate of 1.19% from 1999 to 2012, when the population grew from 6 billion to 7 billion in 13 years.
Thus the known facts of population growth fit the Biblical chronology very well. Population growth mathematics clearly supports the Biblical record.
source
BMOC here doesn't realize I have 318 times more posts than he does, and he doesn't realize whittling it down to 10% still means I have 32 times his posts.
Unless embedded in that 10%, I have attempted to defend what he called my "faulty beliefs".
QV please:
Some mistakes are easier to own up to than others, aren't they?You are correct. I made an error. I did mean standard geology.
Hey, look how easy that was! I made a mistake. I owned up to it. It no longer matters.
Some mistakes are easier to own up to than others, aren't they?
Looks like its time to repost this little graphic.That's science propaganda.
Big companies make money selling prophylactics.
You want the best s_x education one can get?
- Teach that having s_x outside of marriage is a sin.
- Learn to, as our greatest First Lady said, JUST SAY NO.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?