Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Dogs can achieve incredible genetic diversity in a very short time, but humans can't?
Had it been possible to show that the flood actually happened I am sure one of creationists wealthy supporters would have proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt, they haven't so I guess it remains just another bible story for children.
I don't think so. The definition of sexuality to a Christian might have to do with..well...sex. The broad scope of sex education in a pagan school would possibly have a focus on birth control, abortion, perverted so called sex acts being presented as legitimate and equal...etc. If they questions kids that would just end up a means to persecute them for their beliefs.About sex and sexuality.
None at all to be preciseWe have only vague ideas about how the first life could have come to exist,
but we know a great deal about how genetic diversity arises and what it looks like for different demographic histories. Modern human genetic diversity did not come from 5 individuals (Noah, wife, 3 daughters-in-law) at any time within the last half million years or so.
None at all to be precise
You do realize that your statements are just a statement of faith that modern genetics existed since Noah right? This is a science forum no?
Humans have been actively picking traits they want to emphasize for breeding for thousands of years. All domesticated plants and animals have gone through this to varying degrees. Nature doesn't work this efficiently.Dogs can achieve incredible genetic diversity in a very short time, but humans can't?
Actually, I know well the meaning. Rather than obfuscate and dodge the issue just address it. Prove that genetics was the same for Noah & co. Otherwise you lose. I don't believe it was.You don't seem to know the meaning of the word "faith". All of his claims are supported by evidence and scientific testing. "Faith" is not.
Had it been possible to show that the flood actually happened I am sure one of creationists wealthy supporters would have proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt, they haven't so I guess it remains just another bible story for children.
No. You sure can't. Don't try to pawn of faith as science.Actually the opposite is the case. We can show that mountains like Everest are millions of years old.
Actually, I know well the meaning. Rather than obfuscate and dodge the issue just address it. Prove that genetics was the same for Noah & co. Otherwise you lose. I don't believe it was.
No. You sure can't. Don't try to pawn of faith as science.
Wrong, the burden of proof is not upon me, it is upon you.
Science has no evidence.You are the one that is trying to claim without any evidence at all that genetic laws changed over time.
We get it, you cannot show any science for your made up genetics claims about Noah, and now want to insult God's word and people.You need something better than a book that was written by rather ignorant tribesmen to support your case.
There is no more a burden of proof to cover what science cannot cover, than there is a blanket for the moon actually. You claimed certain things regarding genetics and Noah. I point out you are talking through your hat.
The life spans and other things mentioned in the bible about Noah's day do not support your same state past gene pool that you pretend Noah swam in!
Science has no evidence I do. I have God's word. If you claim something opposed to that you better be prepared to back it up. You will not pass fables here anymore.
We get it, you cannot show any science for your made up genetics claims about Noah, and now want to insult God's word and people.
Had it been possible to show that the flood actually happened I am sure one of creationists wealthy supporters would have proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt, they haven't so I guess it remains just another bible story for children.
Actually the opposite is the case. We can show that mountains like Everest are millions of years old. That means for a flood to occur we would need over five miles of water and it could not have left a mark. Also wooden boats of the size described in the Noah's story would quickly fail. Wood has limited strength, as do all materials, and eventually you run afoul of the square/cube law.
I don't think so. The definition of sexuality to a Christian might have to do with..well...sex. The broad scope of sex education in a pagan school would possibly have a focus on birth control, abortion, perverted so called sex acts being presented as legitimate and equal...etc. If they questions kids that would just end up a means to persecute them for their beliefs.
Knowing that I suppose the wealthy creationist decided to keep the money in the bank, wise move.
Knowing that I suppose the wealthy creationist decided to keep the money in the bank, wise move.
What does this have to do with my post?
Humans have been actively picking traits they want to emphasize for breeding for thousands of years. All domesticated plants and animals have gone through this to varying degrees. Nature doesn't work this efficiently.
There isn't really much diversity in humans compared to dogs.
Although I consider the Flood my minor forté (creation being my major), this is one thing I can't answer for!Don't forget the compost.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?