• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Creationism vs. Everything

driewerf

a day at the Zoo
Mar 7, 2010
3,434
1,961
✟267,108.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I think meteorology is the single sience that is not under their fire. The way of predicting the weather of tomorrow still fits into teh biblical narrowness.
 
Upvote 0

driewerf

a day at the Zoo
Mar 7, 2010
3,434
1,961
✟267,108.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
So now we chage the htpothesis to fit the theory. It doesn't matter if it came from some other form of energy, it all started somewhere at sometime by something or someone of very great power.
No, the hypotheses has never been changed. The very first time the Big bang theory was formulated (by a Belgian catholic priest!) he used the words "cosmic egg". But he never said "nothing".
 
Upvote 0

mpok1519

Veteran
Jul 8, 2007
11,508
347
✟36,350.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Chaos and order are misnomers in the scientific world; what human brands of emotionalism that are attached to these concepts and how they are applied to universal law don't really fit what we call "chaos". Entropic processes aren't chaotic, buy orderly. The same can be said for order; order is just chaos in an alternative form. The processes of how things build and synthesize as well as break down and decay are integral processes to the universe; how we attach human emotionalism as a case or a creator makes false assumptions.

Big bang theory doesn't specify everything came from nothing; imagine a constantly expanding and contracting universe, where big bangs never cease happening forever, endlessly, with no end, and no beginning. This fits the laws
of theormodynamics.
 
Upvote 0

Flatland

Junior Member
Aug 25, 2010
202
5
✟22,874.00
Faith
Atheist

1st of all the big Bang didn't explode from nothing. This is just your typical creationist strawman

2nd of all, you start off by saying that matter can't be created nor destroyed but then you go on to say that your invisible friend (god) can create matter. Contradiction much? So can matter be created or can not be created? You can't even make up your mind lmao
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Same difference really. something or Someone had to be more powerful that the universe they created, according to the laws of science, which cannot be discarded for just because they don't fit. The question then is WHO?

It's not the same difference. Big Bang states that our universe started as an infinitely small and infinitely hot point of spacetime. Big Bang is the origin of matter/energy, space, and time.

Now, the origin of the universe does not need to be "more powerful" than the universe. Just capable of creating the universe. And actually the "laws of science" at least so far as Relativity is concerned do not apply at the Big Bang!

So the question is not "or WHO?" but also "Or WHAT?" And that is where there are at least 4 other candidates besides God as the origin of the universe. They are all "whats".
 
Upvote 0