Interesting double standard - if (in your opinion) creationists mislead or 'deviate from the truth' it shows how nobody's perfect, but if an atheist does it they're a 'bad apple'...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Interesting double standard - if (in your opinion) creationists mislead or 'deviate from the truth' it shows how nobody's perfect, but if an atheist does it they're a 'bad apple'...If any creationist has misled or deviated from the truth then that shows how nobody is perfect.
... I am very sorry that you have a story to tell that is contrary to the truth but there are bad apples on every apple tree.
Geology is clearly not your strong point.There are many rocks and formations on the surface of the earth that science claims that are as old as the earth itself and yet science tells us that almost all the giant craters that covered this planet at one time have been washed and eroded away isn't that funny.
A science class is for the teaching and learning of science.So the student can keep an open mind rather than just pushing science down their throats.
I think you should read all the threads from the start as comprehension really isn't one of your strong points. I made it clear that my belief is that the earth is 6000 years young so my point regarding the age of the rocks is meaningless. remember comprehension, must learn that before you can debate but then again you haven't debated anything that I can see.Geology is clearly not your strong point.
You are the bad apple for falsely accusing me I will forgive you as it is a consequence of your lack of comprehension. I will wait for you to fly in and drop another bomb and then fly off.Interesting double standard - if (in your opinion) creationists mislead or 'deviate from the truth' it shows how nobody's perfect, but if an atheist does it they're a 'bad apple'...
When I see the rolling hills that traverse the landscape and the great mountains that line the coasts I see a great flood that changed the face of the earth. The weight of Noah's flood would have been so heavy that it cracked the continental shelves and formed the mountains and continents that we have today. As the water subsided and flooded the lower areas the hills were formed just like ripples in the sand. So I see the largest landscaping event since the start of the creation itself. God has presented to us the evidence on the ground that we stand upon.
I disagree eg: In a class of Astro physics if a student asked the teacher how did the universe begin would it be wrong for the teacher to say it all started with a singularity that may or may not be kicked off by God. As we all know the big bang has quite a bit of conjecture about it and can never be proven yet some teachers like to make a solid case for the big bang theory.
I say let's include God in all topics until proven false not wait till proven true. After all, there are many lines of science that are discussed in a class that are not fully understood.
I have made my statement and I will stick with it. So tell me where did all of those big impact craters go and why are there still rocks as old as the earth still on the surface I am the one that asked the question and you expect me to answer my own question you can do better than that can't you but if I have you stumped I will have to explain it to you.
Thank you now you're asking the right questions. You seemed quite sharp at reviewing my past posts and questioning all that you could find but you seem to have missed one of my posts that made it clear that I believe the bible in a literal sense. You see I believe the earth is 6000 years old not 4.5 billion and I don't believe the earth was ever peppered by large asteroids or comets. It is you that believes in that not me I was provoking a response for creation v evolution now if you have no interest or knowledge of either then there is nothing to debate with you or can you hold up your end of whatever you do believe in.
Well I don't know if you have noticed but the Moon has craters that are 1000+ kilometers in diameter and they are the most recent impacts that we see strange how the moon can be struck by so many of the largest asteroids in such a short period of time and the earth left out of that equation.All the evidence is against you. Radiometric dating of meteorites and lunar rocks has yielded ages up to 4560 million years, and there are many large terrestrial impact structures, such as Vredefort, Sudbury, Manicouagan, Popigai, Puchezh-Katunki, Manicouagan, Morokweng, Acraman, Yarrabubba, and Araguainha.
Well I don't know if you have noticed but the Moon has craters that are 1000+ kilometers in diameter and they are the most recent impacts that we see strange how the moon can be struck by so many of the largest asteroids in such a short period of time and the earth left out of that equation.
Now that you have explained the question so thoroughly I can understand now.I guess you didn't take the time to look up the answer to that.
Now that you have explained the question so thoroughly I can understand now.
That wasn't the question, my question was why are there so many large craters on the moon, and why are the largest craters the youngest ones?If your Google is not working...I could help. Let me know. Otherwise copy and paste 'why does the moon have more craters that the earth' into your search engine.
That wasn't the question, my question was why are there so many large craters on the moon, and why are the largest craters the youngest ones?
Try pasting 'why are there so many large craters on the moon, and why are the largest craters the youngest ones?' into Google.
Let me know if you need further help.
I already know the truth it's just that many others are still stuck on the scientific nonsense. So that's full circle all part of atheists being atheists.Then I can't help you. But you should have tried that first.
You picked up on the question that I put to someone else in reply 170 so I was not wasting anyone's time I was asking if he had noticed the fact that I already know. I have no need to research what I have to share.Then it was something of waste of your time and mine in asking the question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?